Motorola Edge 30 Neo vs Edge 30 Fusion: The Ultimate Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion is the clear winner thanks to its significantly more powerful Snapdragon 888+ chipset, offering a vastly superior performance experience. While the Neo has a slightly brighter display, the Fusion's overall package, including performance and camera capabilities, makes it the better choice for most users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Edge 30 Neo | Motorola Edge 30 Fusion |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 43 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - PRC | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, September 08 | 2022, September 08 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, October 07 | Available. Released 2022, September 08 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 152.9 x 71.2 x 7.8 mm (6.02 x 2.80 x 0.31 in) | 158.5 x 72 x 7.5 mm or 7.7 mm |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 155 g (5.47 oz) | 168 g / 175 g (5.93 oz) |
| Splash and dust resistant | Splash and dust resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~419 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.28 inches, 95.2 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~90.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | P-OLED, 120Hz | P-OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1100 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) | Octa-core (1x2.99 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888+ 5G (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Adreno 660 |
| OS | Android 12, planned upgrade to Android 15 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, AF | - |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm, AF Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30/60/120fps | 8K@30fps, 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm, AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS (B1I+B1c), GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| - | Ready For 3.5 support | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 68W wired 5W wireless | 68W wired, 50% in 10 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4020 mAh | Li-Po 4400 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Very Peri, Black Onyx, Ice Palace, Aqua Foam | Neptune Blue, Cosmic Grey, Solar Gold, Aurora White, Viva Magenta |
| Models | XT2245-1 | XT2243-1 |
| Price | € 156.44 / $ 185.00 / £ 229.00 | About 150 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 104h | Endurance rating 101h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -26.4 LUFS (Good) | -24.6 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 380818 (v9) GeekBench: 1964 (v5.1) GFXBench: 16fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 827929 (v9) GeekBench: 3458 (v5.1) GFXBench: 62fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Motorola Edge 30 Neo
- Slightly brighter display
- Excellent battery life
- More affordable
- Stylish design
- Wireless charging
- Weaker processor
- Less powerful camera
- May struggle with demanding tasks
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
- Significantly faster processor
- Better camera performance
- Faster charging (50% in 10 min)
- Premium feel
- Strong overall performance
- Slightly less bright display
- Potentially higher price
- No wireless charging
Display Comparison
The Edge 30 Neo edges out the Fusion with a slightly higher peak brightness of 1004 nits compared to the Fusion's 946 nits. Both feature excellent contrast ratios (infinite nominal), resulting in vibrant and immersive viewing experiences. However, the Neo's slightly brighter screen might be preferable in direct sunlight. Both use OLED panels, ensuring excellent color accuracy and deep blacks.
Camera Comparison
While both phones offer capable camera systems, the Fusion's Snapdragon 888+ generally provides better image processing and low-light performance. The Fusion's camera is likely to capture more detail and produce more vibrant colors. Specific camera specs (megapixels, aperture) are similar across both devices, but the processing power of the Fusion's chipset gives it an advantage.
Performance
This is where the Fusion truly shines. The Snapdragon 888+ is a significant upgrade over the Neo's Snapdragon 695 5G. Expect noticeably faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a much better gaming experience on the Fusion. The Neo is perfectly adequate for everyday tasks, but struggles with demanding games and applications.
Battery Life
Both phones offer impressive battery life, with endurance ratings of 104h and 101h respectively. The Neo's slightly better rating suggests marginally better efficiency, but the difference is minimal. Both support 68W wired charging, allowing for rapid top-ups. The Fusion also boasts 50% charge in 10 minutes, a notable convenience.
Buying Guide
The Motorola Edge 30 Neo is ideal for users prioritizing a vibrant display, efficient power consumption, and a more budget-friendly price point. The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion is best suited for those who demand strong performance for gaming, multitasking, and photography, and are willing to spend a bit more.