Motorola Edge 30 Fusion vs Samsung Galaxy A54: The Ultimate Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A54 edges out the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion thanks to its superior battery life, brighter display, and faster charging capabilities. While the Edge 30 Fusion boasts a more powerful chipset, the A54's overall package provides a more well-rounded and user-friendly experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Edge 30 Fusion | Samsung Galaxy A54 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 66 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - PRC | 25, 41, 66, 71 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - USA | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, September 08 | 2023, March 15 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, September 08 | Available. Released 2023, March 24 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 158.5 x 72 x 7.5 mm or 7.7 mm | 158.2 x 76.7 x 8.2 mm (6.23 x 3.02 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 168 g / 175 g (5.93 oz) | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| Splash and dust resistant | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~90.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 100.5 cm2 (~82.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | P-OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1100 nits (peak) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.99 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888+ 5G (5 nm) | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 660 | Mali-G68 MP5 |
| OS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14 | Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 7 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm, AF Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.X", 1.12µm 5 MP (macro) |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@480fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm, AF | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS (B1I+B1c), GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer (USA only) |
| Ready For 3.5 support | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 68W wired, 50% in 10 min | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4400 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Neptune Blue, Cosmic Grey, Solar Gold, Aurora White, Viva Magenta | Lime, Graphite, Violet, White |
| Models | XT2243-1 | SM-A546V, SM-A546U, SM-A546U1, SM-A546B, SM-A546B/DS, SM-A546E, SM-A546E/DS, SM-A5460, SM-A546M, SM-A546M/DS, SM-A546W |
| Price | About 150 EUR | € 210.00 / $ 119.11 / £ 169.95 / ₹ 28,999 |
| SAR | - | 0.81 W/kg (head) 0.67 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.69 W/kg (head) 1.34 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 101h | Endurance rating 119h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -24.6 LUFS (Very good) | -26.6 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 827929 (v9) GeekBench: 3458 (v5.1) GFXBench: 62fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 506678 (v9) GeekBench: 2703 (v5.1), 2797 (v6) GFXBench: 25fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
- More powerful processor (Snapdragon 888+)
- Faster charging (68W)
- Slightly more compact design (likely)
- Good value for performance
- Lower battery life
- Potentially inconsistent camera performance
- Less polished software experience compared to Samsung
Samsung Galaxy A54
- Excellent battery life
- Brighter display
- Reliable Samsung software and updates
- Generally consistent camera performance
- Water and dust resistance (likely)
- Slower charging (25W)
- Less powerful processor
- Can be more expensive
Display Comparison
Both phones feature vibrant displays with excellent contrast ratios (nominally infinite). However, the Samsung Galaxy A54 takes the lead with a measured peak brightness of 980 nits compared to the Edge 30 Fusion's 946 nits. This difference is noticeable in direct sunlight, making the A54's screen easier to view outdoors. Both offer smooth scrolling thanks to high refresh rates (likely 120Hz, though not explicitly stated in the provided specs).
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is subjective and requires more detailed testing. Both phones are listed as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but specific sensor sizes, aperture values, and video recording resolutions are missing. Generally, Samsung's image processing tends to be more consistent and user-friendly, while Motorola's can sometimes be more variable. The A54 likely has better low-light performance.
Performance
The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion holds a performance advantage with its Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ chipset. This flagship-level processor offers significantly more processing power than the Exynos 1380 found in the Galaxy A54. Expect smoother performance in demanding games and applications on the Edge 30 Fusion. However, the Exynos 1380 is still a capable chip and handles everyday tasks with ease.
Battery Life
The Samsung Galaxy A54 clearly wins in the battery department. It boasts an endurance rating of 119h, significantly higher than the Edge 30 Fusion's 101h. Furthermore, the A54 supports 25W wired charging, while the Edge 30 Fusion offers a faster 68W charging, but the A54's larger battery capacity compensates for this. Active use score of 11:15h for the A54 is also impressive.
Buying Guide
The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion is ideal for users prioritizing raw performance and a slightly more compact design. Gamers and those who frequently multitask will appreciate the Snapdragon 888+. The Samsung Galaxy A54 is a better choice for those who value long battery life, a vibrant display, and the reliability of the Samsung ecosystem, especially if camera quality and software updates are important.