Motorola Edge 30 Fusion vs Edge 40 Pro: The Ultimate Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro is the clear winner, boasting a significantly faster processor, faster charging, a brighter display, and a slightly better battery life. While the Edge 30 Fusion remains a solid choice, the 40 Pro's upgrades justify its higher price for most users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Edge 30 Fusion | Motorola Edge 40 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 66 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - PRC | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, September 08 | 2023, April 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, September 08 | Available. Released 2023, April 04 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 158.5 x 72 x 7.5 mm or 7.7 mm | 161.2 x 74 x 8.6 mm (6.35 x 2.91 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 168 g / 175 g (5.93 oz) | 199 g (7.02 oz) |
| Splash and dust resistant | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~90.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~90.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | P-OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1100 nits (peak) | OLED, 1B colors, 165Hz, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.99 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888+ 5G (5 nm) | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 660 | Adreno 740 |
| OS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14 | Android 13, up to 3 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 4.0 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | Dual-LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm, AF Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/1.6, (telephoto), 1/2.93", 1.22µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.2, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps, gyro-EIS | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, 10-bit HDR10+, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm, AF | 60 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.61µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS (B1I+B1c), GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG, DisplayPort 1.4 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Ready For 3.5 support | Ready For 3.5 support | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 68W wired, 50% in 10 min | 125W wired, PD3.0, QC5, 50% in 6 min, 100% in 23 min 15W wireless 5W reverse wired 5W reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 4400 mAh | Li-Po 4600 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Neptune Blue, Cosmic Grey, Solar Gold, Aurora White, Viva Magenta | Interstellar Black, Lunar Blue |
| Models | XT2243-1 | - |
| Price | About 150 EUR | € 313.87 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 101h | Endurance rating 117h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -24.6 LUFS (Very good) | -22.6 LUFS (Excellent) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 827929 (v9) GeekBench: 3458 (v5.1) GFXBench: 62fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 1273764 (v9) GeekBench: 4896 (v5.1), 5352 (v6) GFXBench: 112fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
- Excellent value for money
- Smooth performance for everyday tasks
- Good camera quality
- Compact and lightweight design
- Older chipset
- Slower charging speed
- Lower peak brightness display
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
- Flagship-level performance
- Incredibly fast charging
- Bright and vibrant display
- Improved camera quality
- Premium design
- Higher price
- Potentially larger size
Display Comparison
The Edge 40 Pro takes the display crown with a measured peak brightness of 1050 nits compared to the Fusion's 946 nits. Both offer excellent contrast ratios (infinite nominal), but the 40 Pro's extra brightness makes it more visible in direct sunlight. Both have OLED panels, offering vibrant colors and deep blacks.
Camera Comparison
While both phones offer capable camera systems, the Edge 40 Pro generally produces better image quality, especially in low light. The 40 Pro's image processing algorithms are more advanced, resulting in more detailed and vibrant photos. Both offer similar video recording capabilities, but the 40 Pro may have slightly better stabilization.
Performance
The Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 in the Edge 40 Pro is a substantial upgrade over the Snapdragon 888+ in the Fusion. Expect significantly faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and better performance in demanding games. The 40 Pro's newer architecture also offers improved power efficiency.
Battery Life
The Edge 40 Pro edges out the Fusion with an endurance rating of 117 hours versus 101 hours. However, the real difference lies in charging speed. The 40 Pro's 125W wired charging is incredibly fast, reaching 50% in just 6 minutes, while the Fusion's 68W charging takes longer.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion? It's ideal for budget-conscious users who prioritize a smooth experience and a good camera without breaking the bank. Who should buy the Motorola Edge 40 Pro? Power users, photography enthusiasts, and those who value fast charging and a premium display will appreciate the 40 Pro's enhanced capabilities.