Motorola Edge 30 Fusion vs. Edge 30 Neo: The Ultimate Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Edge 30 Fusion delivers significantly more power thanks to its Snapdragon 888+ chipset, making it ideal for gamers and demanding users. The Edge 30 Neo offers a brighter display, wireless charging, and slightly better battery endurance, appealing to those prioritizing convenience and media consumption. Fusion wins on performance, Neo on features.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Edge 30 Fusion | Motorola Edge 30 Neo |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 66 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 43 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - PRC | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, September 08 | 2022, September 08 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, September 08 | Available. Released 2022, October 07 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 158.5 x 72 x 7.5 mm or 7.7 mm | 152.9 x 71.2 x 7.8 mm (6.02 x 2.80 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 168 g / 175 g (5.93 oz) | 155 g (5.47 oz) |
| Splash and dust resistant | Splash and dust resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~419 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~90.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.28 inches, 95.2 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | P-OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1100 nits (peak) | P-OLED, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.99 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888+ 5G (5 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 660 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14 | Android 12, planned upgrade to Android 15 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, AF |
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm, AF Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30/60/120fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm, AF | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS (B1I+B1c), GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Ready For 3.5 support | - | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 68W wired, 50% in 10 min | 68W wired 5W wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 4400 mAh | Li-Po 4020 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Neptune Blue, Cosmic Grey, Solar Gold, Aurora White, Viva Magenta | Very Peri, Black Onyx, Ice Palace, Aqua Foam |
| Models | XT2243-1 | XT2245-1 |
| Price | About 150 EUR | € 156.44 / $ 185.00 / £ 229.00 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 101h | Endurance rating 104h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -24.6 LUFS (Very good) | -26.4 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 827929 (v9) GeekBench: 3458 (v5.1) GFXBench: 62fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 380818 (v9) GeekBench: 1964 (v5.1) GFXBench: 16fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
- Significantly faster performance
- Excellent for gaming
- Good display quality
- 68W wired charging
- Slightly lower battery endurance
- No wireless charging
- Camera performance could be better
Motorola Edge 30 Neo
- Brighter display
- Wireless charging
- Slightly better battery life
- Stylish design
- Less powerful processor
- Lower gaming performance
- Camera not as strong as competitors
Display Comparison
The Edge 30 Neo takes the display crown with a measured peak brightness of 1004 nits, significantly brighter than the Fusion's 946 nits. Both offer excellent contrast ratios (nominally infinite), resulting in vibrant colors and deep blacks. The Neo's extra brightness is particularly noticeable in direct sunlight. Both use OLED panels, ensuring excellent viewing angles and responsiveness.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature capable camera systems, but detailed camera comparisons require more in-depth testing. Generally, both offer good image quality in well-lit conditions. The Fusion's camera is expected to perform slightly better in low light due to the more powerful processor assisting image processing. Video recording capabilities are likely comparable, offering 4K resolution on both devices.
Performance
Here's where the Fusion truly shines. Its Snapdragon 888+ chipset is a substantial upgrade over the Neo's Snapdragon 695 5G. This translates to noticeably faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and significantly better gaming performance. The Fusion handles demanding games with ease, while the Neo might struggle with the highest settings. The Fusion's CPU configuration also contributes to its superior performance.
Battery Life
The Edge 30 Neo edges out the Fusion in battery life, boasting an endurance rating of 104 hours compared to the Fusion's 101 hours. While the difference is marginal, it's still a factor to consider. Both phones support 68W wired charging, allowing for rapid top-ups. The Neo also includes 5W wireless charging, a convenient feature absent on the Fusion.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion? Power users, gamers, and anyone needing a fast and responsive phone for demanding tasks. Who should buy the Motorola Edge 30 Neo? Users prioritizing a brighter display, wireless charging, and slightly longer battery life, and those seeking a more feature-rich experience.