Motorola Edge (2025) vs Samsung Galaxy S25 FE: Which Mid-Range Flagship Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing long-term battery health and a brighter, more vibrant display, the Samsung Galaxy S25 FE is the superior choice. Its 42:37 hour endurance and 1247 nits peak brightness outweigh the Motorola Edge (2025)'s faster 68W charging, especially given the Exynos 2400's more robust multi-core performance.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Edge (2025) | Samsung Galaxy S25 FE |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66, 71 | LTE |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 12, 14, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 70, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, May 27 | 2025, September 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, June 06 | Available. Released 2025, September 04 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus+), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus+), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 161.2 x 73.1 x 8 mm (6.35 x 2.88 x 0.31 in) | 161.3 x 76.6 x 7.4 mm (6.35 x 3.02 x 0.29 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + eSIM· eSIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 181 g (6.38 oz) | 190 g (6.70 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+, Mohs level 5 |
| Resolution | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~444 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~385 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~92.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 110.2 cm2 (~89.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | P-OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 4500 nits peak | Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1900 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | 10-core (1x3.2GHz Cortex-X4 & 2x2.9GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.6GHz Cortex-A720 & 4x1.95GHz Cortex-A520) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7400 Ultra (4 nm) | Exynos 2400 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Xclipse 940 |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16, up to 7 major Android upgrades, One UI 8 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama, Best Face |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 10 MP, f2.0, 73mm (telephoto), 1/3.94", 1.0µm, PDAF, 3x optical zoom, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 12mm, 122˚ (ultrawide), 0.64µm, PDAF | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.57", 1.0µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.4, 75mm (telephoto), 1/4.4", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 8K@24/30fps, 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS, HDR10+ |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 0.64µm, PDAF | 12 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/3.2", 1.12µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS, HDR10+ |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (with Dolby Atmos) | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, NavIC | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band or tri-band (market/region dependent), Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 68W wired 15W wireless | 45W wired, PD, QC2, 65% in 30 min 15W wireless, Qi2 compatible Reverse wireless |
| Type | 5200 mAh | 4900 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Deep Forest | Icyblue, Jetblack, Navy, White |
| Models | XT2519 | SM-S731B, SM-S731B/DS |
| Price | $ 399.99 | $ 474.99 / C$ 664.75 / € 493.00 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.54 W/kg (head) 1.57 W/kg (body) |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | - | 42:37h endurance, 2000 cycles |
| Energy | - | Class B |
| Free fall | - | Class A (270 falls) |
| Repairability | - | Class C |
Motorola Edge (2025)
- Faster 68W wired charging
- Potentially more aggressive pricing
- Mediatek Dimensity 7400 Ultra offers good efficiency
- Unknown display brightness and quality
- Older generation CPU cores
- Limited battery endurance data
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
- Exceptional 42:37 hour battery endurance
- Bright 1247 nits display
- Exynos 2400 offers strong multi-core performance
- Slower 45W wired charging than the Edge
- Potential for Exynos thermal throttling under sustained load
- Samsung software can be feature-heavy
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy S25 FE boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1247 nits, making it far more usable in direct sunlight compared to the Motorola Edge (2025) (brightness data unavailable). While panel technology isn't specified for the Edge, the S25 FE’s brightness advantage is substantial. Samsung’s history suggests a high-quality AMOLED panel with excellent color accuracy. The S25 FE also benefits from Qi2 wireless charging compatibility, a newer standard for faster and more efficient wireless power transfer.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for the Motorola Edge (2025), a direct comparison is limited. However, Samsung typically prioritizes camera performance in its FE line. The S25 FE likely features a more sophisticated image processing pipeline and potentially larger sensor sizes, leading to better low-light performance and dynamic range. The absence of information regarding OIS on the Edge suggests the S25 FE will have an advantage in video stabilization. We can assume both phones will have a multi-camera setup, but the S25 FE’s image quality is likely to be superior.
Performance
The Exynos 2400 in the S25 FE, with its 10-core architecture (1x3.2GHz Cortex-X4, 2x2.9GHz Cortex-A720, 3x2.6GHz Cortex-A720, and 4x1.95GHz Cortex-A520), offers a more complex and potentially powerful CPU configuration than the Motorola Edge (2025)'s Mediatek Dimensity 7400 Ultra (Octa-core 4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55). The Cortex-X4 core in the Exynos is a performance leader, likely translating to faster app loading and smoother multitasking. However, both chips are fabricated on a 4nm process, suggesting comparable efficiency. The Dimensity 7400 Ultra’s Cortex-A78 cores are older generation, potentially impacting sustained performance under heavy load.
Battery Life
The Samsung Galaxy S25 FE’s battery performance is a clear standout. Its 42:37 hour endurance and active use score of 11:57h demonstrate exceptional longevity. While the Motorola Edge (2025) offers faster 68W wired charging, the S25 FE’s 45W charging with 65% charge in 30 minutes is still competitive. The S25 FE’s 2000 charge cycles also indicate a longer lifespan, mitigating battery degradation over time. The inclusion of reverse wireless charging on the S25 FE adds further versatility.
Buying Guide
Buy the Motorola Edge (2025) if you prioritize faster wired charging and are comfortable with potentially less refined software. It’s ideal for users who frequently top up their phones quickly. Buy the Samsung Galaxy S25 FE if you value exceptional battery life, a brighter display for outdoor visibility, and the peace of mind that comes with Samsung’s software support and 2000 charge cycles.