Xiaomi 13T vs Motorola Edge (2023): Which Mid-Range Champion Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi 13T emerges as the stronger choice. Its Dimensity 8200 Ultra chipset delivers significantly better performance, and its impressive 12:23h active use battery life surpasses the Motorola Edge (2023)'s capabilities. While the Motorola Edge offers wireless charging, the Xiaomi 13T’s overall package is more compelling.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Edge (2023) | Xiaomi 13T |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 12, 14, 20, 25, 26, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 70, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, October 11 | 2023, September 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, October 11 | Available. Released 2023, September 26 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, aluminum frame, silicone polymer back (eco leather) | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back or silicone polymer back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 158.4 x 72 x 7.6 mm (6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 in) | 162.2 x 75.7 x 8.5 mm (6.39 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 168 g (5.93 oz) | 193 g or 197 g (6.81 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~90.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | P-OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1200 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 144Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1200 nits (HBM), 2600 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 Ultra (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC3 | Mali-G610 MC6 |
| OS | Android 13, planned upgrade to Android 14 | Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.4, (wide), 1/1.5", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm, AF | - |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Leica lens, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.28", 1.22µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/1.9, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.88", 0.61µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 15mm (ultrawide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, HDR, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps (HDR10+), 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 0.8µm | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 0.8µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, HDR10+ |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5), BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/k/v/r, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 68W wired 15W wireless | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 42 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4400 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Eclipse Black | Alpine Blue, Meadow Green, Black |
| Models | - | 2306EPN60G |
| Price | $ 189.95 | $ 255.96 / £ 326.27 / € 204.18 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) |
Motorola Edge (2023)
- Wireless charging offers added convenience.
- Potentially cleaner software experience (Motorola's near-stock Android).
- Slightly faster wired charging (68W vs 67W).
- Less powerful chipset (Dimensity 7030 vs 8200 Ultra).
- Likely shorter battery life based on chipset efficiency.
- Display likely lacks the peak brightness of the Xiaomi 13T.
Xiaomi 13T
- Significantly more powerful Dimensity 8200 Ultra chipset.
- Exceptional battery life (12:23h active use).
- Brighter display (1264 nits peak brightness).
- Lacks wireless charging.
- Xiaomi's MIUI software can be more cluttered.
- Charging time is 42 minutes, slightly slower than theoretical Edge 2023.
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi 13T boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1264 nits, compared to an unspecified peak brightness for the Motorola Edge (2023). This higher brightness translates to improved visibility in direct sunlight. While both likely utilize AMOLED panels, the Xiaomi 13T’s brightness advantage is a clear win for outdoor users. Details regarding refresh rate and panel technology (LTPO) are missing for the Motorola Edge (2023), potentially indicating a less advanced display compared to the 13T.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera specifications beyond 'Photo / Video' are absent for both devices. However, given Xiaomi’s history, the 13T likely features a more versatile camera system with a larger main sensor and more advanced image processing algorithms. The Motorola Edge (2023) may focus on software-driven enhancements, but the Xiaomi 13T’s hardware advantage is probable. The absence of information regarding OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on either device makes it difficult to assess low-light performance definitively.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Xiaomi 13T’s MediaTek Dimensity 8200 Ultra, fabricated on a 4nm process, offers a substantial performance advantage over the Motorola Edge (2023)’s Dimensity 7030 (6nm). The 8200 Ultra’s CPU configuration – 1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78, 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78, and 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 – is more powerful than the Edge’s 2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55. The 4nm process also contributes to better thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of throttling during sustained workloads like gaming. This means the Xiaomi 13T will maintain higher performance levels for longer periods.
Battery Life
The Xiaomi 13T excels in battery performance, achieving an impressive 12:23h of active use. While the Motorola Edge (2023)’s battery capacity is unknown, the 13T’s endurance rating of 101 hours suggests a significantly larger battery or more efficient power management. Charging speeds are comparable – 67W wired for the Xiaomi 13T (fully charging in 42 minutes) and 68W for the Motorola Edge (2023). The Motorola Edge (2023) adds 15W wireless charging, a convenience the Xiaomi 13T lacks, but the 13T’s superior battery life mitigates this advantage.
Buying Guide
Buy the Motorola Edge (2023) if you prioritize a cleaner software experience and the convenience of wireless charging. Buy the Xiaomi 13T if you demand superior processing power for gaming and demanding applications, and value exceptional battery endurance for all-day use. The 13T is the better pick for power users.