The Motorola Edge 20 and Xiaomi Poco F3 GT represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range smartphone market. The Edge 20 aims for a balanced experience with a focus on design and efficient performance, while the Poco F3 GT aggressively targets gamers with a powerful chipset and rapid charging. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing a balanced experience and efficient power management, the Motorola Edge 20 emerges as the winner. Its Snapdragon 778G offers strong performance without sacrificing battery life, and its display provides a pleasant viewing experience. However, gamers seeking raw power and ultra-fast charging will find the Poco F3 GT more appealing.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 66 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 38, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, July 29 | 2021, July 23 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, August 16 | Available. Released 2021, July 26 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame, glass back (Gorilla Glass 3) | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Dimensions | 163 x 76 x 7 mm (6.42 x 2.99 x 0.28 in) | 161.9 x 76.9 x 8.3 mm (6.37 x 3.03 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 163 g (5.75 oz) | 205 g (7.23 oz) |
| | Water-repellent design | Physical pop-up gaming triggers
IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~385 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 110.2 cm2 (~89.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+ | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1200 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 642L | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, MIUI 13 for POCO |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Triple | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.4, 79mm (telephoto), 1.0µm, 3x optical zoom, PDAF, OIS
16 MP, f/2.2, 17mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm, AF | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, 720p@960fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps, HDR |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.3, (wide), 0.7µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, HDR |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio
Tuned by JBL |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 30W wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 42 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh | Li-Po 5065 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Frosted Grey, Frosted White, Frosted Emerald | Predator Black, Gunmetal Silver |
| Models | XT2143-1 | MZB09C6IN, M2104K10I |
| Price | About 140 EUR | About 300 EUR |
| SAR | - | 0.81 W/kg (head) 0.48 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life |
Endurance rating 86h
| - |
| Camera |
Photo / Video | - |
| Display |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | - |
| Loudspeaker |
-28.7 LUFS (Average)
| - |
| Performance |
AnTuTu: 424031 (v8), 488574 (v9)
GeekBench: 2550 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 29fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | - |
Motorola Edge 20
- Excellent battery endurance (86h)
- Efficient Snapdragon 778G processor
- Bright and vibrant display (650 nits)
- Slower charging speed (30W)
- Less powerful CPU compared to the Poco F3 GT
Xiaomi Poco F3 GT
- Blazing-fast 67W charging (0-100% in 42 mins)
- Powerful MediaTek Dimensity 1200 processor
- Ideal for demanding mobile games
- Potentially shorter battery life due to power-hungry chipset
- Limited camera information available
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 20 boasts a display capable of reaching 650 nits of peak brightness, ensuring good visibility even outdoors. While the Poco F3 GT’s display specifications aren’t provided, the Edge 20’s contrast ratio is listed as 'Infinite (nominal)', suggesting a strong OLED panel. The lack of refresh rate information for the Poco F3 GT is a notable omission, but the Edge 20’s display quality is a strong point for media consumption and general use. The Edge 20’s brightness is a key advantage for outdoor usability.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are listed with 'Photo / Video' capabilities, offering limited insight. Without specific sensor details, it’s difficult to make a definitive comparison. However, the Motorola Edge 20’s brand positioning suggests a greater emphasis on image quality and software processing. The Poco F3 GT, geared towards gaming, likely prioritizes speed and responsiveness over advanced camera features. The absence of details like megapixel counts or aperture values makes a detailed camera analysis impossible, but the Edge 20 likely offers a more refined photographic experience.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the Motorola Edge 20 utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G (6nm), while the Poco F3 GT is powered by the MediaTek Dimensity 1200 (6nm). The Dimensity 1200, with its 3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 prime core, significantly outperforms the Edge 20’s 2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 core in raw CPU power. However, the Snapdragon 778G is known for its efficiency. The Dimensity 1200’s higher clock speeds will translate to faster loading times and smoother performance in demanding games, but potentially at the cost of increased heat generation and battery drain. The Edge 20’s CPU configuration (1x2.4GHz + 3x2.2GHz + 4x1.9GHz) is a more balanced approach, prioritizing sustained performance over peak bursts.
Battery Life
The Motorola Edge 20 achieves an endurance rating of 86 hours, indicating solid battery life. It supports 30W wired charging. The Poco F3 GT, however, boasts a significantly faster 67W wired charging solution, capable of reaching 100% charge in just 42 minutes. While the Edge 20’s endurance suggests a larger battery capacity, the Poco F3 GT’s charging speed is a game-changer for users who frequently need to top up their device. The faster charging of the Poco F3 GT directly addresses the potential battery drain caused by its more powerful processor.
Buying Guide
Buy the Motorola Edge 20 if you need a sleek, well-rounded smartphone with good battery life and a capable camera for everyday use. It’s ideal for users who value a refined experience and don’t demand the absolute highest gaming performance. Buy the Xiaomi Poco F3 GT if you prioritize gaming above all else, demanding maximum frame rates and benefiting from the 67W fast charging to minimize downtime between sessions. It’s the choice for power users and mobile gaming enthusiasts.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Dimensity 1200 in the Poco F3 GT overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Dimensity 1200 is a powerful chip, and sustained high performance can generate significant heat. While the Poco F3 GT likely incorporates thermal management solutions, users should expect some throttling during extended gaming sessions. The Snapdragon 778G in the Edge 20 is known for its efficiency and is less prone to overheating.
❓ How does the Snapdragon 778G's 6nm process affect the Motorola Edge 20's battery life compared to the Dimensity 1200?
Both chipsets are manufactured on a 6nm process, but the Snapdragon 778G is architecturally designed for efficiency. This means it consumes less power for similar tasks, resulting in longer battery life. The Dimensity 1200 prioritizes raw performance, which comes at the cost of increased power consumption.
❓ Is the 30W charging on the Motorola Edge 20 slow compared to the Poco F3 GT's 67W?
Yes, 30W is considerably slower than 67W. While the Edge 20's battery endurance is good, topping up the battery will take significantly longer. The Poco F3 GT's 67W charging is a major advantage for users who need a quick boost.
