Motorola Edge 20 vs Moto G82: A Head-to-Head Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Moto G82 emerges as the winner for most users due to its significantly longer battery life and competitive performance at a generally lower price point. While the Edge 20 boasts a slightly more powerful chipset, the G82's endurance and value make it a stronger contender.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Edge 20 | Motorola Moto G82 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 38, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, July 29 | 2022, May 12 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, August 16 | Available. Released 2022, June 07 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame, glass back (Gorilla Glass 3) | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 163 x 76 x 7 mm (6.42 x 2.99 x 0.28 in) | 160.9 x 74.5 x 8 mm (6.33 x 2.93 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 163 g (5.75 oz) | 173 g (6.10 oz) |
| Water-repellent design | Water-repellent design | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~385 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 110.2 cm2 (~89.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~86.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+ | AMOLED, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 642L | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS | UFS | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.4, 79mm (telephoto), 1.0µm, 3x optical zoom, PDAF, OIS 16 MP, f/2.2, 17mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm, AF | 50 MP, f/1.8 (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, 720p@960fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.3, (wide), 0.7µm | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | FM radio (market/region dependent) |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 30W wired | 30W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Frosted Grey, Frosted White, Frosted Emerald | Meteorite Gray, White Lily |
| Models | XT2143-1 | XT2225-1 |
| Price | About 140 EUR | About 290 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 86h | Endurance rating 130h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -28.7 LUFS (Average) | -26.4 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 424031 (v8), 488574 (v9) GeekBench: 2550 (v5.1) GFXBench: 29fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 380812 (v9) GeekBench: 1977 (v5.1) GFXBench: 16fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Motorola Edge 20
- Slightly faster performance
- Premium build quality
- Potentially better low-light camera performance
- Shorter battery life
- Generally higher price
- May not offer significant performance gains for average users
Motorola Moto G82
- Exceptional battery life
- Vibrant and bright display
- Excellent value for money
- Smooth 120Hz refresh rate
- Slightly less powerful chipset
- Plastic build (less premium feel)
- Image processing might not be as refined as Edge 20
Display Comparison
Both phones feature OLED displays with excellent contrast ratios (reported as 'Infinite'). The Moto G82 edges out the Edge 20 with a slightly higher peak brightness of 690 nits versus 650 nits, resulting in marginally better outdoor visibility. Both offer smooth visuals, but the G82's brightness gives it a slight advantage.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is generally comparable, with both phones offering capable photo and video capabilities. The Edge 20 might have a slight edge in low-light conditions due to its more advanced image processing, but the G82's camera is no slouch. Both likely offer similar video recording quality.
Performance
The Edge 20's Snapdragon 778G 5G chipset provides a noticeable performance boost over the Moto G82's Snapdragon 695 5G. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better gaming performance on the Edge 20. However, the G82's chipset is still capable for everyday tasks and most mobile games.
Battery Life
This is where the Moto G82 truly shines. Its endurance rating of 130 hours significantly surpasses the Edge 20's 86 hours. The G82 will easily last a full two days on a single charge, making it a champion for battery life.
Buying Guide
The Motorola Edge 20 is ideal for users prioritizing slightly faster performance and a more premium feel. The Moto G82 is perfect for those seeking exceptional battery life, a vibrant display, and a great value proposition without sacrificing too much on features.