Motorola Edge 20 Pro vs Xiaomi 11T Pro: The Ultimate Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Xiaomi 11T Pro takes the crown thanks to its significantly faster charging, brighter display, and more powerful Snapdragon 888 chipset. While the Edge 20 Pro boasts impressive battery life, the 11T Pro's overall performance and charging speed make it the more appealing choice for most users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Edge 20 Pro | Xiaomi 11T Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 38, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, July 29 | 2021, September 15 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, August 16 | Available. Released 2021, October 05 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame, glass back (Gorilla Glass 5) or eco leather back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), aluminum frame, glass back |
| Dimensions | 163 x 76 x 8 mm (6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 in) | 164.1 x 76.9 x 8.8 mm (6.46 x 3.03 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 185/190 g (depending on color) (6.53 oz) | 204 g (7.20 oz) |
| Water-repellent design | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~385 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 110.2 cm2 (~89.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~85.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+ | AMOLED, Dolby Vision, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 800 nits (typ), 1000 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Adreno 660 |
| OS | Android 11, planned upgrade to Android 13 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, MIUI 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, panorama, HDR | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Triple | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/3.4, 126mm (periscope telephoto), 1.0µm, 5x optical zoom, PDAF, OIS 16 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1.0µm | 108 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 5 MP, f/2.4, 50mm (telephoto macro), 1/5.0", 1.12µm, AF |
| Video | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240/960fps, gyro-EIS | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960, HDR10+, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.3, (wide), 0.7µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | Tuned by Harman Kardon 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, DisplayPort 1.4 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 30W wired | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 72% in 10 min, 100% in 17 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Midnight Blue, Blue Vegan Leather, Iridescent Cloud | Meteorite Gray, Moonlight White, Celestial Blue |
| Models | XT2153-1 | 2107113SG, 2107113SI, 2107113SR |
| Price | About 330 EUR | € 139.00 / $ 185.21 / £ 189.99 / ₹ 39,999 |
| SAR | - | 0.78 W/kg (head) 0.49 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 112h | Endurance rating 92h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -29.2 LUFS (Average) | -26.3 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 711090 (v9) GeekBench: 3140 (v5.1) GFXBench: 49fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | - |
Motorola Edge 20 Pro
- Exceptional battery life
- Smooth performance
- Clean Android experience
- Good camera quality
- Slower charging speed
- Less powerful chipset than 11T Pro
- Design can feel a bit dated
Xiaomi 11T Pro
- Blazing-fast 120W charging
- Bright and vibrant display
- Powerful Snapdragon 888 chipset
- Stylish design
- Battery life slightly shorter than Edge 20 Pro
- Xiaomi's MIUI can be divisive
- Camera processing can sometimes be overly saturated
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi 11T Pro wins here with a measured peak brightness of 837 nits compared to the Edge 20 Pro's 673 nits. Both have excellent contrast ratios (infinite nominal), but the brighter screen on the 11T Pro makes it more visible in direct sunlight. Both utilize AMOLED technology, offering vibrant colors and deep blacks.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer versatile camera systems, but the 11T Pro generally produces slightly more vibrant and detailed images. The Edge 20 Pro's camera is still excellent, particularly in well-lit conditions. Video recording capabilities are comparable on both devices.
Performance
The Xiaomi 11T Pro's Snapdragon 888 (5nm) is noticeably faster than the Edge 20 Pro's Snapdragon 870 (7nm). While the 870 is still a capable chip, the 888 offers superior performance in demanding tasks like gaming and video editing. Expect smoother multitasking and faster app loading times on the 11T Pro.
Battery Life
The Motorola Edge 20 Pro holds a slight advantage in battery endurance, boasting an impressive 112h rating compared to the 11T Pro's 92h. However, the 11T Pro's 120W charging obliterates the Edge 20 Pro's 30W charging, allowing for a full charge in just 17 minutes.
Buying Guide
The Motorola Edge 20 Pro is ideal for users prioritizing long battery life and a smooth, reliable experience. It's a great choice for those who don't need the absolute fastest performance. The Xiaomi 11T Pro is perfect for power users who demand fast charging, a vibrant display, and top-tier performance for gaming and demanding apps.