Motorola Edge 20 Pro vs. Edge 40 Pro: The Ultimate Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro is the clear winner, offering a vastly superior Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chipset, significantly faster charging, and a brighter display. While the 20 Pro remains a capable device, the 40 Pro's advancements make it the better investment for most users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Edge 20 Pro | Motorola Edge 40 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 38, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, July 29 | 2023, April 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, August 16 | Available. Released 2023, April 04 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame, glass back (Gorilla Glass 5) or eco leather back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 163 x 76 x 8 mm (6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 in) | 161.2 x 74 x 8.6 mm (6.35 x 2.91 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 185/190 g (depending on color) (6.53 oz) | 199 g (7.02 oz) |
| Water-repellent design | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~385 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 110.2 cm2 (~89.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~90.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+ | OLED, 1B colors, 165Hz, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Adreno 740 |
| OS | Android 11, planned upgrade to Android 13 | Android 13, up to 3 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 4.0 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, panorama, HDR | Dual-LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Triple | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/3.4, 126mm (periscope telephoto), 1.0µm, 5x optical zoom, PDAF, OIS 16 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1.0µm | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/1.6, (telephoto), 1/2.93", 1.22µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.2, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF |
| Video | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240/960fps, gyro-EIS | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, 10-bit HDR10+, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.3, (wide), 0.7µm | 60 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.61µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, DisplayPort 1.4 | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG, DisplayPort 1.4 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| - | Ready For 3.5 support | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 30W wired | 125W wired, PD3.0, QC5, 50% in 6 min, 100% in 23 min 15W wireless 5W reverse wired 5W reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4600 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Midnight Blue, Blue Vegan Leather, Iridescent Cloud | Interstellar Black, Lunar Blue |
| Models | XT2153-1 | - |
| Price | About 330 EUR | € 313.87 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 112h | Endurance rating 117h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -29.2 LUFS (Average) | -22.6 LUFS (Excellent) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 711090 (v9) GeekBench: 3140 (v5.1) GFXBench: 49fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 1273764 (v9) GeekBench: 4896 (v5.1), 5352 (v6) GFXBench: 112fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Motorola Edge 20 Pro
- Excellent battery life
- Capable camera
- Solid performance for the price
- Good value
- Outdated chipset
- Slower charging
- Lower display brightness
- Lacks wireless charging
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
- Blazing-fast 125W charging
- Bright and vibrant display
- Flagship Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 performance
- Wireless and reverse wireless charging
- Improved camera processing
- Potentially higher price
- Battery life marginally better but not a huge difference
Display Comparison
The Edge 40 Pro boasts a massive upgrade with a 1050 nits peak brightness compared to the 20 Pro's 673 nits. Both have excellent contrast ratios (infinite nominal), but the 40 Pro's increased brightness makes it significantly better for outdoor visibility. The 40 Pro also likely has a more modern panel with smoother scrolling and potentially a higher refresh rate (likely 144Hz vs 130Hz on the 20 Pro).
Camera Comparison
While both phones offer capable camera systems, the Edge 40 Pro likely has improvements in image processing and low-light performance due to the newer chipset and potentially updated sensors. Both likely offer similar primary sensor resolution (50MP), but the 40 Pro's image signal processor (ISP) will be more advanced. Video recording capabilities are also likely enhanced on the 40 Pro.
Performance
The Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 in the Edge 40 Pro is a generational leap over the Snapdragon 870 in the 20 Pro. Expect significantly faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and vastly improved gaming performance. The 40 Pro's newer chipset also benefits from improved power efficiency.
Battery Life
Both phones offer similar endurance ratings (112h vs 117h), suggesting comparable battery life in typical usage. However, the Edge 40 Pro's 125W wired charging is a game-changer, allowing for incredibly fast top-ups compared to the 20 Pro's 30W charging. The 40 Pro also includes wireless and reverse wireless charging, features absent on the 20 Pro.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the Motorola Edge 20 Pro? Those on a tighter budget who prioritize battery life and don't need the absolute latest performance. Who should buy the Motorola Edge 40 Pro? Anyone seeking a flagship experience with blazing-fast charging, a stunning display, and top-tier performance.