Motorola Edge 20 Pro vs. Edge 40: A Head-to-Head Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Motorola Edge 40 emerges as the winner thanks to its significantly brighter display, faster charging (wired and wireless), and more modern chipset. While the Edge 20 Pro boasts slightly better battery endurance, the Edge 40's overall improvements make it the more compelling choice for most users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Edge 20 Pro | Motorola Edge 40 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 38, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, July 29 | 2023, May 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, August 16 | Available. Released 2023, May 04 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame, glass back (Gorilla Glass 5) or eco leather back | Glass front, aluminum frame, plastic back or eco leather back |
| Dimensions | 163 x 76 x 8 mm (6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 in) | 158.4 x 72 x 7.6 mm (6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 185/190 g (depending on color) (6.53 oz) | 167 g or 171 g (5.89 oz) |
| Water-repellent design | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~385 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 110.2 cm2 (~89.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~90.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+ | P-OLED, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) | Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 8020 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| OS | Android 11, planned upgrade to Android 13 | Android 13, up to 2 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.4, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, AF |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, panorama, HDR | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/3.4, 126mm (periscope telephoto), 1.0µm, 5x optical zoom, PDAF, OIS 16 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1.0µm | - |
| Video | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240/960fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps, HDR10, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.3, (wide), 0.7µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, DisplayPort 1.4 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| - | Moto Ready For support | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 30W wired | 68W wired 15W wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4400 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Midnight Blue, Blue Vegan Leather, Iridescent Cloud | Nebula Green, Lunar Blue, Eclipse Black, Viva Magenta |
| Models | XT2153-1 | XT2303-2 |
| Price | About 330 EUR | € 202.03 / $ 419.99 / £ 199.00 / ₹ 29,999 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 112h | Endurance rating 98h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -29.2 LUFS (Average) | -24.2 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 711090 (v9) GeekBench: 3140 (v5.1) GFXBench: 49fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 688347 (v9) GeekBench: 3320 (v5.1), 3603 (v6) GFXBench: 33fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Motorola Edge 20 Pro
- Slightly better battery life
- Mature software experience
- Potentially better zoom capabilities
- Older chipset
- Lower display brightness
- Slower charging
Motorola Edge 40
- Brighter display
- Faster charging (wired & wireless)
- More modern chipset
- Likely higher refresh rate
- Slightly lower battery life
Display Comparison
The Edge 40's display is a clear winner. It boasts a measured peak brightness of 1043 nits compared to the Edge 20 Pro's 673 nits. This translates to significantly better visibility outdoors and a more immersive viewing experience. Both have excellent contrast ratios (infinite nominal), but the Edge 40's brightness advantage is undeniable. The Edge 40 also likely features a higher refresh rate (typically 144Hz) compared to the Edge 20 Pro (135Hz), further enhancing smoothness.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature capable camera systems, but detailed camera comparisons require more in-depth testing. The Edge 20 Pro likely has a slightly more versatile camera setup with potentially better zoom capabilities. However, the Edge 40's image processing and newer sensor technology could result in improved low-light performance and more accurate colors. Both phones likely record video up to 8K resolution.
Performance
The Edge 40's Dimensity 8020 chipset offers a noticeable performance boost over the Edge 20 Pro's Snapdragon 870. While the Snapdragon 870 is still a capable processor, the Dimensity 8020 benefits from a more modern architecture and improved efficiency. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better gaming performance on the Edge 40. Both phones offer ample RAM (likely 8GB or 12GB) for most users.
Battery Life
The Edge 20 Pro holds a slight edge in battery endurance, with an endurance rating of 112 hours compared to the Edge 40's 98 hours. However, the Edge 40's significantly faster 68W wired charging and 15W wireless charging more than compensate for the slightly lower battery life. You'll spend less time plugged in with the Edge 40.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the Motorola Edge 20 Pro? Users prioritizing maximum battery life and a slightly more mature software experience might find value. Who should buy the Motorola Edge 40? Those seeking a vibrant display, faster charging, and a more recent processor will appreciate the Edge 40's upgrades.