Motorola Edge 20 Pro vs Edge 30 Neo: The Ultimate Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Edge 20 Pro offers superior performance thanks to its Snapdragon 870 chipset. However, the Edge 30 Neo shines with its significantly faster 68W charging, brighter display, and more modern design. For power users, the 20 Pro wins; for those prioritizing charging speed and a vibrant screen, the 30 Neo is the better choice.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Edge 20 Pro | Motorola Edge 30 Neo |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 43 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 38, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, July 29 | 2022, September 08 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, August 16 | Available. Released 2022, October 07 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame, glass back (Gorilla Glass 5) or eco leather back | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 163 x 76 x 8 mm (6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 in) | 152.9 x 71.2 x 7.8 mm (6.02 x 2.80 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 185/190 g (depending on color) (6.53 oz) | 155 g (5.47 oz) |
| Water-repellent design | Splash and dust resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~385 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~419 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 110.2 cm2 (~89.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.28 inches, 95.2 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+ | P-OLED, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11, planned upgrade to Android 13 | Android 12, planned upgrade to Android 15 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, AF |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, panorama, HDR | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/3.4, 126mm (periscope telephoto), 1.0µm, 5x optical zoom, PDAF, OIS 16 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1.0µm | - |
| Video | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240/960fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30/60/120fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.3, (wide), 0.7µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, DisplayPort 1.4 | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 30W wired | 68W wired 5W wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4020 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Midnight Blue, Blue Vegan Leather, Iridescent Cloud | Very Peri, Black Onyx, Ice Palace, Aqua Foam |
| Models | XT2153-1 | XT2245-1 |
| Price | About 330 EUR | € 156.44 / $ 185.00 / £ 229.00 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 112h | Endurance rating 104h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -29.2 LUFS (Average) | -26.4 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 711090 (v9) GeekBench: 3140 (v5.1) GFXBench: 49fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 380818 (v9) GeekBench: 1964 (v5.1) GFXBench: 16fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Motorola Edge 20 Pro
- Superior Performance (Snapdragon 870)
- Potentially Better Camera Quality
- Good Battery Life
- Slower Charging (30W)
- Older Design
- Lower Display Brightness
Motorola Edge 30 Neo
- Faster Charging (68W wired, 5W wireless)
- Brighter Display (1004 nits)
- More Modern Design
- Compact Size
- Lower Performance (Snapdragon 695)
- Potentially Lower Camera Quality
- Slightly Shorter Battery Endurance
Display Comparison
The Edge 30 Neo takes a clear lead in the display department. It boasts a measured peak brightness of 1004 nits, significantly higher than the Edge 20 Pro's 673 nits. Both offer excellent contrast ratios (infinite nominal), but the 30 Neo's brightness makes it more usable outdoors and in bright environments. The 30 Neo also often features a slightly more modern panel technology (likely OLED vs. IPS LCD on the 20 Pro, though this can vary by region).
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer capable camera systems, but the Edge 20 Pro generally has a slight edge in image quality, particularly in low light. The 20 Pro often features a higher resolution main sensor and potentially better image processing. However, the 30 Neo's camera is still very good and offers pleasing results in most conditions. Specific camera specs (megapixels, aperture) would need to be compared for a more precise assessment.
Performance
The Edge 20 Pro's Snapdragon 870 is the undisputed performance champion. It's a more powerful chipset than the Edge 30 Neo's Snapdragon 695 5G, offering smoother multitasking, faster app loading, and better gaming performance. While the 695 is capable, it's not in the same league as the 870. Expect noticeable differences in demanding tasks.
Battery Life
While the Edge 20 Pro has a slightly higher endurance rating (112h vs 104h), the Edge 30 Neo's 68W wired charging is a game-changer. It can charge from 0% to 100% in around 30-40 minutes, while the 20 Pro's 30W charging takes considerably longer. The difference in endurance rating is likely minimal in real-world usage.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the Motorola Edge 20 Pro? Gamers and users demanding top-tier performance will appreciate the Snapdragon 870. Who should buy the Motorola Edge 30 Neo? Users prioritizing fast charging, a vibrant display, and a more compact design will find the 30 Neo appealing.