Motorola Edge 20 Lite vs Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range 5G Contenders
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G emerges as the stronger choice. Its Snapdragon 778G chipset provides a noticeable performance advantage, particularly in sustained workloads, and its brighter 800 nit display enhances outdoor visibility. While the Edge 20 Lite offers faster 30W charging, the A52s 5G’s overall refinement and processing power make it the more well-rounded device.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Edge 20 Lite | Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 66 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, July 29 | 2021, August 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, August 16 | Available. Released 2021, September 01 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back |
| Dimensions | 165.9 x 76 x 8.3 mm (6.53 x 2.99 x 0.33 in) | 159.9 x 75.1 x 8.4 mm (6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 185 g (6.53 oz) | 189 g (6.67 oz) |
| Water-repellent design | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~385 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 110.2 cm2 (~87.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 1B colors, 90Hz, HDR10+ | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 800 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 720 (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 | Adreno 642L |
| OS | Android 11, planned upgrade to Android 13 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14, One UI 6 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.7", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm 5 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.3, (wide), 0.7µm | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| - | Virtual Proximity Sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 30W wired | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Ion 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Electric Graphite, Lagoon Green | Awesome Black, Awesome White, Awesome Purple, Awesome Mint |
| Models | XT2139-1 | SM-A528B, SM-A528B/DS, SM-A528N |
| Price | About 160 EUR | £ 112.98 / € 249.47 |
| SAR | - | 0.72 W/kg (head) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.88 W/kg (head) 0.84 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 113h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -27.5 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 429675 (v8), 506432(v9) GeekBench: 11060 (v4.4), 2801 (v5.1) GFXBench: 28fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
- Faster 30W wired charging
- Potentially lower price point
- Lightweight design (assumed based on market positioning)
- Less powerful Mediatek Dimensity 720 chipset
- Likely lower display brightness
- Inferior thermal management
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
- More powerful Snapdragon 778G 5G chipset
- Brighter 800 nit display
- Superior image processing capabilities
- Slower 25W wired charging
- Potentially higher price point
- May be slightly heavier
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G boasts a significant advantage with its measured peak brightness of 800 nits, ensuring excellent visibility even under direct sunlight. While the Motorola Edge 20 Lite’s display specifications are not provided, it’s likely to fall short of this figure. The A52s 5G’s 'Infinite' contrast ratio (nominal) suggests a Super AMOLED panel, offering vibrant colors and deep blacks, a contrast to the likely LCD panel in the Edge 20 Lite. Bezels are comparable, but the superior panel technology on the A52s 5G delivers a more immersive viewing experience.
Camera Comparison
Both devices offer photo and video capabilities, but details are limited. The A52s 5G likely benefits from Samsung’s established image processing algorithms. Without sensor size information, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. However, Samsung typically prioritizes image quality in this segment, and the Snapdragon 778G’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) is more advanced than the Dimensity 720’s. The presence of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on the A52s 5G, a common feature in Samsung’s A-series, would further enhance image and video stability, a feature likely absent on the Edge 20 Lite.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G’s Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) is built on a more efficient 6nm process compared to the Motorola Edge 20 Lite’s Mediatek Dimensity 720 (7 nm). The Snapdragon 778G’s CPU configuration – a 1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 prime core alongside 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 cores and 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55 cores – is architecturally superior to the Edge 20 Lite’s 2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A76 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 setup. This translates to faster application loading times and smoother multitasking. The 6nm node also contributes to better thermal management, reducing the likelihood of performance throttling during extended gaming sessions.
Battery Life
Both phones share an endurance rating of 113 hours, suggesting comparable battery life despite differing charging speeds. The Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G offers 25W wired charging, while the Motorola Edge 20 Lite supports 30W. While the Edge 20 Lite charges faster on paper, the A52s 5G’s more efficient chipset may offset this difference in real-world usage. The similar endurance ratings indicate that both devices can comfortably last a full day of moderate use, but the Edge 20 Lite will reach 100% charge slightly quicker.
Buying Guide
Buy the Motorola Edge 20 Lite if you prioritize faster charging speeds and are primarily focused on everyday tasks like social media and light browsing. Its Mediatek Dimensity 720 is sufficient for these use cases. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G if you demand smoother performance in demanding apps, enjoy mobile gaming, or frequently consume content outdoors, benefiting from the brighter display and more powerful Snapdragon 778G.