Motorola Edge 20 Lite vs Samsung Galaxy A34: A Head-to-Head Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A34 emerges as the overall winner thanks to its brighter display, more powerful chipset, and longer software support. While the Edge 20 Lite offers a slightly more premium feel, the A34's superior performance and features justify its price.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Edge 20 Lite | Samsung Galaxy A34 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 66 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, July 29 | 2023, March 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, August 16 | Available. Released 2023, March 24 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 165.9 x 76 x 8.3 mm (6.53 x 2.99 x 0.33 in) | 161.3 x 78.1 x 8.2 mm (6.35 x 3.07 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 185 g (6.53 oz) | 199 g (7.02 oz) |
| Water-repellent design | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~385 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~390 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 110.2 cm2 (~87.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 106.9 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 1B colors, 90Hz, HDR10+ | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 1000 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 720 (7 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1080 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| OS | Android 11, planned upgrade to Android 13 | Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 6.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Triple | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm Auxiliary lens | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 123˚, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 5 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@480fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.3, (wide), 0.7µm | 13 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| - | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 30W wired | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Ion 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Electric Graphite, Lagoon Green | Lime, Graphite, Violet, Silver |
| Models | XT2139-1 | SM-A346E, SM-A346B, SM-A346B/DS, SM-A346B/DSN, SM-A346E/DS, SM-A346E/DSN, SM-A346M, SM-A346M/N, SM-A346M/DSN, SM-A3460 |
| Price | About 160 EUR | € 169.99 / $ 175.00 / £ 164.99 / ₹ 23,999 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.55 W/kg (head) 1.49 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 133h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.1 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 472126 (v9) GeekBench: 2316 (v5.5), 2518 (v6) GFXBench: 23fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
- Sleek design
- Decent OLED display
- Smooth software experience (near-stock Android)
- 108MP Main Camera
- Less powerful chipset
- Lower display brightness
- Potentially shorter software support
Samsung Galaxy A34
- Brighter and more vibrant display
- More powerful chipset (Dimensity 1080)
- Excellent battery life
- Samsung's software support (longer updates)
- Water and dust resistance (IP67)
- Slightly slower charging (25W)
- One UI can be polarizing
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A34 boasts a significantly brighter display at 1009 nits (measured) compared to the Edge 20 Lite. While the Edge 20 Lite has a decent OLED panel, the A34's brightness makes it much easier to view outdoors. The A34's 'Infinite' contrast ratio (nominal) suggests excellent blacks and vibrant colors, further enhancing the viewing experience.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer capable camera systems, but the Galaxy A34 likely holds an advantage. While specific camera specs are not fully detailed, Samsung's image processing is generally considered strong. The A34's camera is expected to deliver more consistent results in various lighting conditions. The Edge 20 Lite's 108MP main sensor might offer higher resolution images, but image quality is more than just megapixels.
Performance
The Galaxy A34's Mediatek Dimensity 1080 chipset (6nm) provides a noticeable performance boost over the Edge 20 Lite's Dimensity 720 (7nm). The A34's Cortex-A78 cores offer improved CPU performance, resulting in smoother multitasking and faster app loading times. Gaming performance will also be better on the A34.
Battery Life
Both phones have excellent battery life, with an endurance rating of 133h. However, the A34's more efficient chipset and optimized software likely contribute to slightly better real-world battery performance. The Edge 20 Lite's 30W charging is comparable to the A34's 25W, so charging times should be similar.
Buying Guide
The Motorola Edge 20 Lite is a good choice for users prioritizing a sleek design and a smooth, albeit slightly less powerful, experience. The Samsung Galaxy A34 is ideal for those seeking a vibrant display, strong performance, excellent battery life, and the reliability of Samsung's software updates.