Motorola's legacy in the Android space is undeniable, and these two phones – the Droid Turbo 2 and the Moto X Style – represent different approaches to delivering a premium experience. Both offered compelling features in their time, but how do they stack up against each other today? Let's dive into a comprehensive comparison.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Droid Turbo 2 edges out the Moto X Style thanks to its significantly faster processor and rugged build. While the Moto X Style boasts impressive battery life, the Turbo 2's performance and durability make it the overall winner for users prioritizing speed and longevity.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - all versions |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 1700 / 1900 / 2100 / 900 - EU (XT1572) |
| 4G bands | 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 13 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 25, 28, 29, 40, 41 - EU (XT1572) |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps, EV-DO Rev.A 3.1 Mbps | HSPA, LTE (2CA) Cat6 300/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE |
| | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2015, October. Released 2015, October | 2015, July. Released 2015, September |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 149.9 x 78 x 9.2 mm (5.90 x 3.07 x 0.36 in) | 153.9 x 76.2 x 11.1 mm (6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 170.1 g (6.00 oz) | 179 g (6.31 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Shatterproof | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1440 x 2560 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~540 ppi density) | 1440 x 2560 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~520 ppi density) |
| Size | 5.4 inches, 81.6 cm2 (~69.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 5.7 inches, 87.9 cm2 (~74.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A57) | Hexa-core (4x1.4 GHz Cortex-A53 & 2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A57) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm MSM8994 Snapdragon 810 (20 nm) | Qualcomm MSM8992 Snapdragon 808 (20 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 430 | Adreno 418 |
| OS | Android 5.1.1 (Lollipop), upgradable to 7.0 (Nougat) | Android 5.1.1 (Lollipop), 6.0, upgradable to 7.0 (Nougat) |
| Memory |
|---|
| Call records | 30 dialed, 30 received, 30 missed calls | - |
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 32GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 3GB RAM | 16GB 3GB RAM, 32GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 3GB RAM |
| Phonebook | 1000 entries | - |
| | eMMC 5.0 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, panorama |
| Single | 21 MP, f/2.0, PDAF | 21 MP, f/2.0, 27mm (wide), 1/2.4", 1.1µm, PDAF |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, HDR | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, HDR |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | LED flash |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.0 | 5 MP, f/2.0, 1/4.0", 1.4µm |
| Video | - | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.1, A2DP, EDR, LE, aptX | 4.1, A2DP, EDR, LE, aptX |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | microUSB 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, hotspot | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, hotspot |
| Features |
|---|
| Browser | WAP 2.0/xHTML | - |
| Games | Yes | - |
| Java | Yes, MIDP 2.0 | - |
| Messaging | SMS, MMS | - |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 15W wired
Wireless (Qi) | 15W wired, 34% in 15 min |
| Stand-by | Up to 360 h (3G) | - |
| Talk time | Up to 48 h (3G) | - |
| Type | Li-Ion 3760 mAh, non-removable | Li-Ion 3000 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black/Soft-Grip, Black/Pebble Leather, Gray/Ballistic Nylon, Winter White/Soft-Grip | Black lens/Dark Gray Frame and accents/ Black Soft Feel InlayWhite lens/Silver Frame and accents/Bamboo Inlay |
| Models | XT1585 | XT1572, XT1575 |
| Price | About 330 EUR | About 260 EUR |
| SAR | 1.38 W/kg (head) 1.13 W/kg (body) | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.43 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.39 W/kg (head) 0.73 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Audio quality | - |
Noise -93.5dB / Crosstalk -92.7dB |
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 63h
|
Motorola Droid Turbo 2
- Faster Processor
- Shattershield Display
- Rapid Charging
- Durable Build
- Good Performance
- Thermal Throttling (Snapdragon 810)
- Larger Size
- Less impressive battery life than Moto X Style
Motorola Moto X Style
- Excellent Battery Life
- Larger Display
- Compact Design
- Clean Software Experience
- Good Camera
- Slower Processor
- Less Durable
- Performance can lag with demanding apps
Display Comparison
The Moto X Style features a larger 5.5-inch display (2560 x 1440 resolution) compared to the Turbo 2's 5.2-inch (2560 x 1440 resolution) screen. Both offer excellent sharpness and vibrant colors, but the Moto X Style's slightly larger size provides a more immersive viewing experience. The Turbo 2's display was known for its shattershield technology, offering enhanced durability.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature 21MP rear cameras, but image quality differs. The Moto X Style's camera was praised for its clean and natural-looking photos, while the Turbo 2's camera tended to produce slightly more saturated images. Low-light performance is comparable. Both have front-facing cameras around 5MP.
Performance
The Droid Turbo 2's Snapdragon 810 chipset and octa-core processor provide a noticeable performance boost over the Moto X Style's Snapdragon 808 and hexa-core processor. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better gaming performance on the Turbo 2. While the 810 had thermal throttling issues, it generally outperformed the 808.
Battery Life
The Moto X Style shines in this category, boasting an exceptional endurance rating of 63 hours. The Droid Turbo 2's battery life is respectable, but not as impressive. However, the Turbo 2's rapid charging capabilities (15W wired and Qi wireless) help offset this difference.
Buying Guide
The Motorola Droid Turbo 2 is ideal for power users and those needing a durable phone capable of handling demanding tasks. The Moto X Style is a great choice for users prioritizing battery life and a more compact design, especially if found at a budget price.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Droid Turbo 2 still worth buying?
If you prioritize performance and durability and can find it at a good price, the Turbo 2 remains a capable device. However, newer phones offer significant improvements.
❓ Which phone has better software support?
Both phones are no longer receiving major Android updates. However, Motorola's software was generally clean and bloatware-free on both devices.
