Motorola RAZR M vs ThinkPhone: A Clash of Eras
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Motorola ThinkPhone decisively wins this comparison. Its vastly superior chipset, display, charging speed, and significantly longer battery life make it a clear upgrade. The RAZR M holds nostalgic value, but the ThinkPhone offers a modern, powerful experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola DROID RAZR M | Motorola ThinkPhone |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | CDMA 800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - ROW |
| 4G bands | 13 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 - ROW |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - ROW |
| Speed | HSPA 21.1/5.76 Mbps, LTE, EV-DO Rev.A 3.1 Mbps | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2012, September. Released 2012, September | 2023, January 05 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2023, January 29 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), aramid fibre back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 122.5 x 60.9 x 8.3 mm (4.82 x 2.40 x 0.33 in) | 158.8 x 74.4 x 8.3 mm (6.25 x 2.93 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Micro-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 126 g (4.44 oz) | 188.5 g (6.67 oz) |
| Splash resistant | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.3m MIL-STD-810H compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 540 x 960 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~256 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~399 ppi density) |
| Size | 4.3 inches, 51.0 cm2 (~68.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 105.2 cm2 (~89.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED | P-OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Dual-core 1.5 GHz Krait | Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm MSM8960 Snapdragon S4 Plus | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 225 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 4.0.4 (Ice Cream Sandwich), upgradable to 4.4 (KitKat) | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDHC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 8GB 1GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, AF | - |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.5", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, AF Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 4K@30fps HDR10, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | VGA | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm - ROW model 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1.0µm - PRC model |
| Video | 720p | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.0, EDR, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n, dual-band, hotspot, DLNA | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer (North America only) |
| MP3/AAC+/WAV/WMA player MP4/H.264/WMV player Organizer Document viewer/editor Voice memo/dial/commands Predictive text input | - | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | - | 68W wired 15W wireless |
| Stand-by | Up to 408 h | - |
| Talk time | Up to 20 h | - |
| Type | Non-removable Li-Ion 2000 mAh battery | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White | Carbon Black |
| Models | XT907 | XT2309-2 |
| Price | About 250 EUR | € 249.79 |
| SAR | 0.63 W/kg (head) 1.30 W/kg (body) | - |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Audio quality | Noise -82.9dB / Crosstalk -81.6dB | - |
| Battery life | Endurance rating 55h | Endurance rating 116h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -21.6 LUFS (Excellent) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 1081805 (v9) GeekBench: 4207 (v5.1) GFXBench: 90fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Motorola DROID RAZR M
- Sleek design (for its time)
- Compact size
- Relatively affordable (used)
- Outdated chipset
- Short battery life
- Low-resolution display
- Slow charging
- Limited app compatibility
Motorola ThinkPhone
- Powerful Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset
- Excellent battery life
- Bright and vibrant display
- Fast charging (68W wired, 15W wireless)
- Modern features and software
- Potentially higher price point
- Design may not appeal to everyone
Display Comparison
The ThinkPhone's display is a massive leap forward. With a measured peak brightness of 1069 nits and an infinite contrast ratio, it offers exceptional visibility and vibrant colors. The RAZR M's display, while adequate for its time, pales in comparison in terms of brightness and overall quality. The ThinkPhone's display is simply in a different league.
Camera Comparison
While both phones offer 'Photo / Video' capabilities, the ThinkPhone's modern hardware and image processing algorithms provide vastly superior image quality. Expect better detail, dynamic range, and low-light performance from the ThinkPhone. The RAZR M's camera is functional but lacks the sophistication of the ThinkPhone.
Performance
The ThinkPhone's Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset is significantly faster and more efficient than the RAZR M's Snapdragon S4 Plus. The ThinkPhone's octa-core CPU handles demanding tasks and multitasking with ease, while the RAZR M can feel sluggish by today's standards. Gaming and app loading times are dramatically improved on the ThinkPhone.
Battery Life
The ThinkPhone boasts a staggering 116-hour endurance rating, dwarfing the RAZR M's 55-hour rating. Coupled with 68W wired and 15W wireless charging, the ThinkPhone offers exceptional battery life and fast charging capabilities. The RAZR M's battery life is noticeably shorter and lacks fast charging support.
Buying Guide
The DROID RAZR M is best suited for those seeking a retro Android experience or a budget-friendly device for basic tasks. The ThinkPhone is ideal for power users, professionals, and anyone prioritizing performance, a vibrant display, and long battery life.