The Motorola Defy and Defy+ were legendary for their durability and Android experience in a tough package. The Defy Mini offered a more compact and affordable option. But which one holds up best today? Let's dive into a detailed comparison to help you decide.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Motorola Defy+ edges out the Defy Mini thanks to its significantly faster processor and slightly better overall performance. While the Mini is more compact, the Defy+'s power makes it the better choice for those needing a responsive experience on an older Android device. Both are champions of ruggedness.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 900 / 2100 |
| Speed | HSPA 7.2/2 Mbps | HSPA |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA | GSM / HSPA |
| | HSDPA 850 / 1900 | HSDPA 850 / 2100 |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2011, August. Released 2011, September | 2012, January. Released 2012, February |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 107 x 59 x 13.4 mm (4.21 x 2.32 x 0.53 in) | 109 x 58.5 x 12.6 mm (4.29 x 2.30 x 0.50 in) |
| SIM | Mini-SIM | Mini-SIM |
| Weight | 118 g (4.16 oz) | 107 g (3.77 oz) |
| | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | Dust/water resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass |
| Resolution | 480 x 854 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~265 ppi density) | 320 x 480 pixels, 3:2 ratio (~180 ppi density) |
| Size | 3.7 inches, 37.7 cm2 (~59.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 3.2 inches, 30.5 cm2 (~47.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | TFT | TFT, 256K colors |
| | Touch sensitive controls
MOTOBLUR UI with Live Widgets | Touch sensitive controls |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | 1.0 GHz Cortex-A8 | 600 MHz |
| Chipset | TI OMAP 3620 | - |
| GPU | PowerVR SGX530 | - |
| OS | Android 2.3 (Gingerbread) | Android 2.3.6 (Gingerbread) |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDHC (dedicated slot), 2 GB included | microSDHC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 2GB 512MB RAM | 512MB 512MB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | LED flash |
| Single | 5 MP, AF | 3.15 MP |
| Video | 480p@30fps | Yes |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | - | VGA |
| | No | - |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 2.1, A2DP, EDR | 2.1, A2DP |
| Positioning | GPS, A-GPS | GPS, A-GPS |
| Radio | Stereo FM radio, RDS | Stereo FM radio, RDS |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | microUSB 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, DLNA, hotspot | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA, hotspot |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity, compass | Accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| | MP3/WAV/WMA/AAC+ player
MP4/WMV/H.264 player
Document viewer
Photo viewer/editor
Organizer
Voice memo/dial/commands
Predictive text input | MP3/WAV/WMA/AAC+ player
MP4/WMV/H.264 player
Document viewer
Photo viewer/editor
Organizer
Voice memo/dial
Predictive text input |
| Battery |
|---|
| Stand-by | Up to 384 h | Up to 504 h |
| Talk time | Up to 7 h 10 min | Up to 10 h |
| Type | Removable Li-Po 1700 mAh battery | Removable Li-Ion 1650 mAh battery |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, White | Black |
| Price | About 170 EUR | About 160 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.08 W/kg (head) 1.49 W/kg (body) |
Motorola DEFY+
- Faster Processor
- Larger Battery
- Slightly Better Display Resolution
- Rugged Design
- Larger Size
- Older Android Version
Motorola Defy Mini XT320
- More Compact Size
- More Affordable
- Rugged Design
- Slower Processor
- Smaller Battery
- Lower Display Resolution
- Can Feel Sluggish
Display Comparison
Both phones feature a 3.7-inch capacitive touchscreen. The Defy+ has a slightly higher resolution (480x854) compared to the Defy Mini's (480x320), resulting in a marginally sharper image. However, the difference is subtle and largely unnoticeable in everyday use. Both displays are designed for outdoor visibility, though viewing angles are limited.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature a 5MP camera. Image quality is comparable, with decent performance in good lighting conditions. Low-light performance is weak on both devices, as expected for phones of this era. Video recording capabilities are limited to 480p on both.
Performance
This is where the Defy+ truly shines. Its 1.0 GHz Cortex-A8 processor significantly outperforms the Defy Mini's 600 MHz CPU. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and a more responsive overall experience on the Defy+. The Defy Mini can feel sluggish at times, especially with more demanding apps.
Battery Life
The Defy+ boasts a larger 1500mAh battery compared to the Defy Mini's 1200mAh. This translates to noticeably better battery life on the Defy+, allowing for more extended use between charges. Expect a full day of moderate use from the Defy+ and potentially less from the Defy Mini.
Buying Guide
The Motorola Defy+ is ideal for users who prioritize performance and a slightly larger screen, even with a rugged design. The Defy Mini XT320 is best suited for those seeking a smaller, more pocketable rugged phone and are willing to compromise on speed for affordability and portability.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Are these phones still worth buying in 2024?
If you need a rugged phone and are comfortable with an older Android version, they can be. However, consider their age and limited app compatibility.
❓ What Android version do these phones run?
Both originally shipped with Android 2.2 (Froyo), but custom ROMs are available for both devices, allowing for newer Android versions.