The Micromax X600 and Bolt D303 represent Micromax's continued focus on the ultra-budget smartphone segment. While both aim to deliver essential smartphone functionality at a low price point, they differ significantly in internal hardware. This comparison will dissect those differences, focusing on how they impact real-world performance and usability, particularly given the limited information available on the X600.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing basic functionality and occasional app use, the Micromax Bolt D303 is the better choice. Its Mediatek MT6572M chipset provides a demonstrable performance advantage over the X600, which lacks publicly available specifications, suggesting a lower-tier component selection. The D303 offers a smoother, more responsive experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 900 / 1800 - SIM 1 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 |
| 3G bands | - | HSDPA 900 / 2100 |
| EDGE | Class 10 | - |
| GPRS | Class 10 | - |
| Speed | - | HSPA 21.1/5.76 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM | GSM / HSPA |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2010. Released 2010 | 2015, July. Released 2015, July |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 113 x 56 x 12.7 mm (4.45 x 2.20 x 0.5 in) | - |
| SIM | Dual SIM (Mini-SIM) | Dual SIM |
| Weight | 110 g (3.88 oz) | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 240 x 320 pixels, 4:3 ratio (~125 ppi density) | 480 x 800 pixels, 5:3 ratio (~233 ppi density) |
| Size | 3.2 inches, 31.7 cm2 (~50.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 4.0 inches, 45.5 cm2 |
| Type | TFT resistive touchscreen, 256K colors | TFT, 256K colors |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | - | Dual-core 1.3 GHz Cortex-A7 |
| Chipset | - | Mediatek MT6572M (28 nm) |
| GPU | - | Mali-400 |
| OS | - | Android 4.4.2 (KitKat) |
| Memory |
|---|
| Call records | Yes | - |
| Card slot | microSDHC (dedicated slot) | microSDHC |
| Internal | - | 4GB 512MB RAM |
| Phonebook | 1000 entries, Photocall | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | - | LED flash |
| Single | 2 MP | 3.15 MP |
| Video | Yes | 480p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 2.0, A2DP | 4.0, A2DP |
| NFC | - | No |
| Positioning | No | GPS |
| Radio | Stereo FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | 2.0 | microUSB 2.0 |
| WLAN | No | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, hotspot |
| Features |
|---|
| Browser | WAP 2.0/xHTML (Opera Mini) | - |
| Games | Downloadable | - |
| Java | Yes, MIDP 2.0 | - |
| Messaging | SMS, MMS, Email | - |
| Sensors | Accelerometer | Accelerometer |
| Battery |
|---|
| Stand-by | Up to 192 h | Up to 245 h (3G) |
| Talk time | Up to 5 h | Up to 4 h 40 min (3G) |
| Type | Removable Li-Ion 1100 mAh battery | Li-Ion 1300 mAh, removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black | Black |
| Price | About 50 EUR | - |
| SAR | - | 0.39 W/kg (head) 0.64 W/kg (body) |
Micromax X600
- Potentially lower price point (unconfirmed)
- Basic smartphone functionality
- May be suitable for first-time smartphone users
- Lack of published specifications
- Presumed lower performance
- Likely inferior camera quality
Micromax Bolt D303
- Mediatek MT6572M chipset offers better performance
- 28nm process for improved power efficiency
- Known specifications provide clarity
- Basic camera capabilities
- Limited storage space (likely)
- Outdated chipset technology
Display Comparison
Detailed display specifications for the Micromax X600 are unavailable. The Bolt D303, being a budget device, likely features a standard LCD panel with a resolution around 480x854 pixels. Given the price point of both devices, expect limited color accuracy and brightness. The absence of information regarding the X600’s display suggests it likely uses a similarly basic panel, potentially with even lower resolution or brightness, making the D303 the marginally better option due to its known specifications.
Camera Comparison
Camera details for the Micromax X600 are not available. The Bolt D303 likely features a basic rear camera, potentially a 2MP or 5MP sensor. Image quality will be limited, especially in low-light conditions. Without any information on the X600’s camera, it’s reasonable to assume it offers similar or potentially inferior image capture capabilities. Users should not expect high-quality photos from either device; the cameras are primarily for basic documentation.
Performance
The Micromax Bolt D303 is powered by the Mediatek MT6572M, a dual-core 1.3 GHz Cortex-A7 chipset fabricated on a 28nm process. This chipset, while dated, provides a functional level of performance for basic tasks. The Micromax X600, lacking published specifications, is presumed to utilize a less powerful chipset, potentially a single-core processor or an older Mediatek model. The 28nm process of the MT6572M also implies relatively efficient power consumption compared to older nodes. This translates to a smoother user experience on the D303, particularly when launching apps or switching between them.
Battery Life
Battery capacity for both devices is unknown. However, given their budget nature, both likely feature batteries in the 1500-2000 mAh range. The Mediatek MT6572M’s 28nm process in the Bolt D303 contributes to better power efficiency, potentially resulting in slightly longer battery life compared to the X600, assuming the X600 uses a less efficient chipset. Charging speeds are also likely to be slow on both devices, relying on micro-USB charging.
Buying Guide
Buy the Micromax X600 if you need a device for extremely basic communication – calls and texts – and are operating under a very strict budget where even a small price difference matters. It likely targets users upgrading from feature phones. Buy the Micromax Bolt D303 if you prefer a smartphone capable of handling light multitasking, social media browsing, and basic app usage without significant lag. It’s a better option for those seeking a more modern smartphone experience.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Mediatek MT6572M in the Bolt D303 capable of running modern apps like WhatsApp and Facebook?
Yes, the Mediatek MT6572M is sufficient for running basic apps like WhatsApp and Facebook. However, expect some lag when multitasking or using more demanding features within these apps. It's designed for light usage, not intensive gaming or video editing.
❓ Given the lack of information on the Micromax X600, is it safe to assume it's significantly less powerful than the Bolt D303?
Yes, it's a reasonable assumption. Micromax typically segments its product line by price and performance. The Bolt D303's published chipset specifications indicate a functional level of performance, while the X600's complete lack of specifications suggests a lower-tier component selection to achieve an even lower price point.
❓ Will either of these phones receive software updates?
It's highly unlikely that either the Micromax X600 or Bolt D303 will receive significant software updates. Budget smartphones often have limited software support from manufacturers, typically only receiving essential security patches, if any.
