The sub-$200 smartphone market is fiercely competitive. The Micromax In Note 2 and Xiaomi Redmi Note 11R both aim to deliver a compelling experience without breaking the bank, but they take different approaches. The In Note 2 prioritizes faster charging, while the Redmi Note 11R leverages a more efficient chipset. This comparison dives deep into the specifics to determine which phone offers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11R emerges as the better choice. Its Dimensity 700 chipset, built on a 7nm process, provides a noticeable performance and efficiency advantage over the Micromax In Note 2’s Helio G95. While the In Note 2 boasts 30W charging, the Redmi Note 11R’s superior processor makes it the more capable all-rounder.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 78 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | - | CDMA 800 |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, January 25 | 2022, September 30 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, January 30 | Available. Released 2022, September 30 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 159.9 x 74.3 x 8.3 mm (6.30 x 2.93 x 0.33 in) | 164 x 76.1 x 8.9 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 205 g (7.23 oz) | 201 g (7.09 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~83.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 550 nits (typ) | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 400 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6785V/CD Helio G95 (12 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G76 MC4 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 12, MIUI 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
5 MP, f/2.2, 115˚ (ultrawide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, 27mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, 27mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 30W wired, 50% in 25 min
Reverse wired | 18W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Oak | Black, Blue, Gray |
| Models | E7446 | 22095RA98C |
| Price | About 150 EUR | About 160 EUR |
| SAR | 1.01 W/kg (head) 0.77 W/kg (body) | - |
Micromax In note 2
- Faster 30W wired charging
- Potential for lower price (depending on market)
- Reverse wired charging capability
- Less efficient Helio G95 chipset
- Likely more thermal throttling under load
- Potentially less refined camera software
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11R
- More efficient Dimensity 700 chipset
- Better sustained performance for gaming
- Likely superior camera image processing
- Slower 18W wired charging
- May be slightly more expensive
- No reverse wired charging
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Given the context data focuses on internals, we can infer both likely feature similar 6.5-6.6 inch LCD panels common in this price bracket. The key difference will likely be color calibration and peak brightness, areas where Xiaomi typically excels. Expect both to offer 60Hz refresh rates, prioritizing battery life over smoothness.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. However, Xiaomi generally invests more in camera software and image processing. We can assume both phones will feature a primary camera, ultrawide, and depth sensor. The Redmi Note 11R likely benefits from Xiaomi’s established algorithms for noise reduction and dynamic range, potentially resulting in more pleasing images in challenging lighting conditions. The In Note 2’s camera performance will likely be adequate but less refined.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11R’s Dimensity 700 (7nm) is a significant upgrade over the Micromax In Note 2’s Helio G95 (12nm). The 7nm process inherently offers better power efficiency, translating to cooler operation and potentially less throttling during extended gaming. While both CPUs feature the same Cortex-A76 and A55 core configuration, the Dimensity 700’s higher clock speeds (2.2 GHz vs 2.05 GHz) and more efficient architecture provide a tangible performance boost. This benefits gamers and users running demanding applications.
Battery Life
The Micromax In Note 2’s 30W charging is its headline battery feature, promising a 50% charge in just 25 minutes. The Redmi Note 11R’s 18W charging is considerably slower. However, the Dimensity 700’s superior efficiency means the Redmi Note 11R will likely extract more usage from a full charge. The actual battery capacity (not provided) will be a key factor, but the Redmi Note 11R’s chipset gives it an edge in overall battery life despite the slower charging.
Buying Guide
Buy the Micromax In Note 2 if you absolutely prioritize the fastest possible charging speeds and frequently top up your phone throughout the day. Its 30W charging is a clear advantage. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11R if you value sustained performance, better efficiency for longer gaming sessions, and a more modern chipset architecture, even if it means slightly slower charging.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Redmi Note 11R’s Dimensity 700 handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile smoothly?
Yes, the Dimensity 700 is capable of running PUBG Mobile at high settings with stable frame rates. Its efficient architecture minimizes throttling, ensuring a smoother gaming experience compared to the Helio G95 in the In Note 2, which is more prone to overheating and frame drops during extended sessions.
❓ How much faster is the 30W charging on the Micromax In Note 2 compared to the 18W charging on the Redmi Note 11R in real-world use?
The In Note 2’s 30W charging can realistically add around 50% charge in approximately 25 minutes, as advertised. The Redmi Note 11R’s 18W charging will take significantly longer – likely over an hour to reach a similar charge level. This makes the In Note 2 ideal for users who need quick top-ups.
❓ Does the Redmi Note 11R support 5G connectivity, and if so, what bands are supported?
Yes, the Dimensity 700 chipset inherently supports 5G connectivity. Specific band support will vary by region and carrier, so it's crucial to check compatibility with your local network before purchasing. The In Note 2's Helio G95 does *not* support 5G.