The Micromax In Note 2 and the Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G represent compelling options in the competitive budget smartphone space. While both aim to deliver a feature-rich experience without breaking the bank, they take different approaches to achieving this goal. This comparison dives deep into their specifications to determine which device offers the best balance of performance, battery life, and value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G emerges as the stronger contender. Its more efficient Dimensity 810 chipset, coupled with a comparable battery endurance rating, provides a smoother overall experience. While the Micromax In Note 2 offers a respectable feature set, the Poco’s performance edge justifies the slight price difference.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA - India |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, January 25 | 2021, November 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, January 30 | Available. Released 2021, November 11 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 159.9 x 74.3 x 8.3 mm (6.30 x 2.93 x 0.33 in) | 163.6 x 75.8 x 8.8 mm (6.44 x 2.98 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 205 g (7.23 oz) | 195 g (6.88 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~399 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 105.2 cm2 (~84.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 550 nits (typ) | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 450 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6785V/CD Helio G95 (12 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 810 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G76 MC4 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, MIUI 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide) |
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
5 MP, f/2.2, 115˚ (ultrawide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, 27mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | Panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, 27mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 30W wired, 50% in 25 min
Reverse wired | 33W wired, 100% in 59 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Oak | Poco Yellow, Power Black, Cool Blue |
| Models | E7446 | 21091116AG, MZB0BGVIN |
| Price | About 150 EUR | About 150 EUR |
| SAR | 1.01 W/kg (head) 0.77 W/kg (body) | 1.07 W/kg (head) 1.09 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.59 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 123h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1553:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-24.9 LUFS (Very good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 296721 (v8), 353663 (v9)
GeekBench: 1797 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 13fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Micromax In note 2
- Locally supported brand (Micromax)
- 30W fast charging
- Competitive price point
- Less efficient Helio G95 chipset
- Likely lower peak display brightness
- Limited information on camera capabilities
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
- More efficient Dimensity 810 chipset
- Faster 33W charging (full charge in 59 mins)
- Higher peak display brightness (510 nits)
- Xiaomi’s MIUI software can be polarizing
- Potentially less brand recognition in some markets
Display Comparison
Both the Micromax In Note 2 and the Poco M4 Pro 5G share a contrast ratio of 1553:1, suggesting similar visual pop. However, the Poco M4 Pro 5G boasts a measured peak brightness of 510 nits, which is a significant advantage in outdoor visibility compared to what we'd expect from the In Note 2, given its lack of published brightness data. While both likely utilize IPS LCD panels, the Poco’s higher brightness makes it the better choice for users who frequently use their phones in direct sunlight.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are lacking. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is difficult. However, given Xiaomi’s generally stronger image processing algorithms, the Poco M4 Pro 5G is likely to deliver more consistently pleasing results, especially in challenging lighting conditions. The presence of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on the Poco, if present (not confirmed in data), would further enhance its photographic capabilities.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Poco M4 Pro 5G’s Mediatek Dimensity 810 (6nm) offers a clear advantage over the Micromax In Note 2’s Helio G95 (12nm). The 6nm process node translates to improved power efficiency and thermal management, meaning the Poco is less likely to throttle under sustained load. The Dimensity 810’s CPU, with 2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 cores, also provides a noticeable performance boost over the In Note 2’s 2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 cores. This difference will be most apparent in gaming and demanding applications.
Battery Life
Both devices achieve an endurance rating of 123 hours, indicating comparable overall battery life. However, the Poco M4 Pro 5G’s 33W charging significantly outperforms the Micromax In Note 2’s 30W charging, achieving a full charge in 59 minutes versus 25 minutes for 50%. This faster charging speed is a considerable convenience factor, especially for users who frequently find themselves needing to top up their battery quickly. The more efficient Dimensity 810 also contributes to better battery life under load.
Buying Guide
Buy the Micromax In Note 2 if you prioritize a locally supported brand and are primarily focused on everyday tasks like browsing, social media, and light multimedia consumption. Buy the Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G if you value smoother performance in demanding applications, enjoy mobile gaming, and want the benefits of 5G connectivity with a more efficient processor.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Mediatek Dimensity 810 in the Poco M4 Pro 5G get hot during extended gaming sessions?
The Dimensity 810’s 6nm process node is significantly more efficient than the Helio G95’s 12nm node. This translates to lower heat generation under load, reducing the likelihood of significant thermal throttling during prolonged gaming. While some warmth is expected, the Poco M4 Pro 5G should maintain a more consistent frame rate over longer periods.
❓ Is the 30W charging on the Micromax In Note 2 fast enough for daily use?
While 30W is considered fast charging, the Poco M4 Pro 5G’s 33W charging is noticeably quicker, reaching 100% in 59 minutes compared to the In Note 2’s partial charge in 25 minutes. For users who frequently need to quickly top up their battery, the Poco’s faster charging is a significant advantage.
❓ How does the software experience differ between the Micromax In Note 2 and the Poco M4 Pro 5G?
The Micromax In Note 2 likely runs a near-stock Android experience, which appeals to users who prefer a clean and uncluttered interface. The Poco M4 Pro 5G runs Xiaomi’s MIUI, which is heavily customized and offers a wide range of features, but can also include pre-installed bloatware and a different aesthetic. This is a matter of personal preference.
