The Motorola Moto G71s and Micromax In Note 2 represent compelling options in the crowded mid-range smartphone market. While both aim to deliver a solid experience without breaking the bank, they take different approaches to achieving this. The G71s prioritizes 5G connectivity and efficiency, while the In Note 2 focuses on a slightly more powerful CPU core configuration. This comparison dives deep into their specifications to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user, the Motorola Moto G71s is the stronger choice. Its Snapdragon 695 chipset, built on a more efficient 6nm process, offers a better balance of performance and battery life, alongside the benefit of 5G connectivity. While the In Note 2's Helio G95 has higher clocked cores, the G71s' overall system optimization and efficiency win out.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 | LTE |
| 5G bands | - | SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| | - | CDMA2000 1x |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, January 25 | 2022, May 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, January 30 | Available. Released 2022, June 20 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 159.9 x 74.3 x 8.3 mm (6.30 x 2.93 x 0.33 in) | 160.9 x 74.5 x 8 mm (6.33 x 2.93 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 205 g (7.23 oz) | 173 g (6.10 oz) |
| | - | Water-repellent design |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2440 pixels (~404 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 104.0 cm2 (~86.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 550 nits (typ) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6785V/CD Helio G95 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G76 MC4 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 12 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | UFS |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
5 MP, f/2.2, 115˚ (ultrawide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, 27mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | - |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8 (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 121˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, 27mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.2, 17mm (ultrawide), 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 30W wired, 50% in 25 min
Reverse wired | 33W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Oak | Black, White |
| Models | E7446 | - |
| Price | About 150 EUR | About 240 EUR |
| SAR | 1.01 W/kg (head) 0.77 W/kg (body) | - |
Micromax In note 2
- Potentially higher single-core CPU performance due to higher clocked cores.
- 30W fast charging with reverse wired charging capability.
- May offer a more aggressive price point.
- Less efficient 12nm chipset leads to higher power consumption.
- Lacks 5G connectivity.
- Potentially more thermal throttling under sustained load.
Motorola Moto G71s
- More efficient 6nm Snapdragon 695 chipset for better battery life.
- Integrated 5G modem for future-proof connectivity.
- Qualcomm's optimized software and ISP for improved camera performance.
- Slightly lower CPU clock speeds compared to the In Note 2.
- 33W charging is only marginally faster than the In Note 2's 30W.
- May be slightly more expensive.
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Details regarding panel type (IPS vs AMOLED) and resolution are missing, but both likely target a 1080p+ resolution common in this price bracket. The key difference lies in the chipsets powering them; the more efficient Snapdragon 695 in the G71s will contribute to slightly better battery life during display-intensive tasks. Bezels are likely comparable, and without specific color accuracy data, it's difficult to assess which offers a more vibrant or accurate picture.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs beyond the chipsets, a direct comparison is limited. Both phones likely feature a multi-camera setup with a primary sensor, ultrawide, and potentially a macro lens. The image signal processor (ISP) within the Snapdragon 695 generally offers superior image processing capabilities, resulting in better dynamic range and noise reduction. The G71s is likely to produce more consistent and detailed photos, especially in challenging lighting conditions. The In Note 2's Helio G95 ISP is capable, but falls behind Qualcomm's offerings.
Performance
The chipset battle is central here. The Motorola Moto G71s utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm), featuring a 2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver CPU configuration. This 6nm process is significantly more efficient than the 12nm process used in the Micromax In Note 2's MediaTek Helio G95. While the In Note 2's Helio G95 has higher clocked Cortex-A76 cores (2.05 GHz vs 2.2 GHz on the G71s), the Snapdragon 695's architectural improvements and efficiency gains translate to better sustained performance and less thermal throttling. The G71s also benefits from Qualcomm's optimized software and modem integration. Gamers will find the G71s provides a smoother experience over longer sessions.
Battery Life
The Motorola Moto G71s features 33W wired charging, while the Micromax In Note 2 supports 30W. While the difference is minor, the G71s' more efficient Snapdragon 695 chipset will allow it to achieve a longer battery life on a single charge. The In Note 2's 30W charging can reach 50% in 25 minutes, but the G71s' efficiency means it will likely offer more usable screen-on time before needing a recharge. The actual battery capacity of both devices is not provided, but the G71s' efficiency is a significant advantage.
Buying Guide
Buy the Micromax In Note 2 if you prioritize raw CPU power for tasks like video editing or demanding apps, and don't require 5G connectivity. Its Helio G95 offers a slight edge in single-core performance. Buy the Motorola Moto G71s if you value battery life, 5G access, and a more refined user experience. The Snapdragon 695's efficiency and integrated modem make it ideal for everyday use and future-proofing.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Micromax In Note 2 struggle with graphically intensive games like PUBG Mobile?
The Helio G95 is capable of running PUBG Mobile, but you may experience noticeable frame drops and thermal throttling during extended gaming sessions. The Snapdragon 695 in the Moto G71s will provide a smoother and more consistent gaming experience due to its superior efficiency and thermal management.
❓ Does the Motorola Moto G71s support all 5G bands available in the US?
5G band support varies by carrier and region. You'll need to check the specific Moto G71s model number and compare its supported bands with your carrier's 5G network to ensure compatibility. The Snapdragon 695 supports a wide range of 5G bands, but not all variants are enabled on every model.
❓ Is the 30W charging on the Micromax In Note 2 significantly slower than the 33W on the Moto G71s?
The difference in charging speed is relatively small. However, the Moto G71s' more efficient chipset means it will likely reach a full charge faster overall, as it won't generate as much heat during the charging process. The In Note 2's 50% in 25 minutes claim is competitive, but the G71s will likely offer more usable battery life during that charging time.
