The Micromax In Note 1 and Wiko 10 represent compelling options in the ultra-budget smartphone segment. Both aim to deliver essential smartphone functionality at a low price point, but they achieve this with different chipsets and feature sets. This comparison dives deep into the specifications to determine which device offers the best value for your money.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Micromax In Note 1 emerges as the stronger choice. Its Helio G85 chipset, featuring more powerful Cortex-A75 cores, provides a noticeable performance advantage in demanding tasks and gaming, offsetting the Wiko 10’s slightly faster charging.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/11.5 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat7 300/150 Mbps | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, November 03. Released 2020, November 24 | 2022, September 22 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2022, October 10 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 165.2 x 77 x 9 mm (6.50 x 3.03 x 0.35 in) | 168.3 x 77.6 x 9 mm (6.63 x 3.06 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 196 g (6.91 oz) | 199 g (7.02 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Oleophobic coating | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~260 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~84.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.75 inches, 110.0 cm2 (~84.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 450 nits (peak) | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6765 Helio G37 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 12 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
5 MP, f/2.2, 115˚ (ultrawide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Single | - | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 28mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro), AF
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, 27mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired
2.5W reverse wired | 22.5W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Green, White | Klein Blue, Black, Silver |
| Models | E7746 | - |
| Price | About 130 EUR | About 140 EUR |
| SAR | 0.57 W/kg (head) 0.96 W/kg (body) | - |
Micromax In note 1
- More powerful processor (Helio G85)
- Superior CPU architecture (Cortex-A75 cores)
- Reverse wired charging capability
- Slower charging speed (18W)
- Likely less optimized software
Wiko 10
- Faster charging speed (22.5W)
- Potentially more streamlined software experience
- Slightly newer chipset (though not necessarily better)
- Less powerful processor (Helio G37)
- Inferior CPU architecture (Cortex-A53 cores)
- No reverse charging
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Given the context data focuses on processing power, we can infer both likely utilize standard IPS LCD panels. The absence of information regarding resolution, refresh rate, or brightness suggests both target the bare minimum for usability. Bezels are likely substantial on both, typical for this price bracket. Color accuracy will likely be standard, leaning towards warmer tones to appear more vibrant.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is difficult. However, given the price point, both phones likely feature a primary sensor paired with basic auxiliary lenses (potentially a depth or macro sensor). The absence of OIS on either device suggests image stabilization will rely solely on software processing. Image quality will likely be acceptable in good lighting conditions, but both will struggle in low-light scenarios. The focus should be on the primary sensor's megapixel count and aperture, which are currently unknown, but the G85's ISP (Image Signal Processor) is likely more capable, potentially leading to better image processing.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Micromax In Note 1’s MediaTek Helio G85 utilizes a combination of 2x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This configuration provides a significant advantage in multi-core performance compared to the Wiko 10’s Helio G37, which employs 4x 2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. While the G37’s A53 cores clock slightly higher, the A75 cores in the G85 are architecturally superior, offering better instructions-per-clock (IPC). This translates to snappier app launches and smoother multitasking on the Micromax. The G85 also benefits from a more capable GPU, making it the better choice for mobile gaming. The Wiko 10's G37 will struggle with more demanding titles.
Battery Life
The Wiko 10’s 22.5W wired charging is faster than the Micromax In Note 1’s 18W charging. This means the Wiko 10 will likely achieve a 0-100% charge in a shorter timeframe. However, charging speed isn’t everything. Battery life depends on both capacity (unknown for both) and power efficiency. The Helio G85 in the Micromax In Note 1, while more powerful, is also a 12nm chip, and its power draw during intensive tasks could offset some of the charging speed advantage of the Wiko 10. The 2.5W reverse wired charging on the Micromax is a niche feature, useful for topping up accessories but not a primary selling point.
Buying Guide
Buy the Micromax In Note 1 if you prioritize consistent performance for everyday tasks and occasional gaming, and value a chipset with a proven track record. Buy the Wiko 10 if your primary concern is minimizing charging time and you primarily use your phone for basic communication and light social media, accepting a trade-off in processing power.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Micromax In Note 1 handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile smoothly?
The Helio G85 in the Micromax In Note 1 is capable of running PUBG Mobile, but you'll likely need to lower the graphics settings to medium or low to achieve a consistently smooth frame rate. The Wiko 10's Helio G37 will struggle with PUBG, even on the lowest settings.
❓ How long will it take to fully charge the Wiko 10 with the 22.5W charger?
While a precise time is unavailable, the Wiko 10's 22.5W charging should take approximately 1.5 to 2 hours for a full charge, assuming a typical battery capacity for this price range. This is faster than the Micromax In Note 1's 18W charging.
❓ Is the difference in CPU architecture (A75 vs A53) really noticeable in everyday use?
Yes, the difference is noticeable. The Cortex-A75 cores in the Micromax In Note 1 are significantly more powerful than the Cortex-A53 cores in the Wiko 10. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive overall user experience, especially when switching between apps.
