The Micromax In Note 1 and Realme Pad represent distinct approaches to affordable mobile computing. The In Note 1 aims to deliver smartphone functionality at a low price, while the Realme Pad focuses on providing a larger-screen experience for media consumption and light productivity. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing a larger display for media and casual gaming, the Realme Pad is the better choice. However, the Micromax In Note 1 offers a more complete smartphone experience with cellular connectivity and slightly faster reverse charging, making it ideal for those needing a primary mobile device.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/11.5 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat7 300/150 Mbps | HSPA, LTE - cellular model only |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, November 03. Released 2020, November 24 | 2021, September 09 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2021, September 16 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, aluminum frame, aluminum back |
| Dimensions | 165.2 x 77 x 9 mm (6.50 x 3.03 x 0.35 in) | 246.1 x 155.9 x 6.9 mm (9.69 x 6.14 x 0.27 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM (cellular model only) |
| Weight | 196 g (6.91 oz) | 440 g (15.52 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Oleophobic coating | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1200 x 2000 pixels, 5:3 ratio (~224 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~84.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 10.4 inches, 307.9 cm2 (~80.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 450 nits (peak) | IPS LCD, 360 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6769V/CU Helio G80 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 11 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM | 32GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR | - |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
5 MP, f/2.2, 115˚ (ultrawide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Single | - | 8 MP |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, 27mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | 8 MP, 105˚ (ultrawide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers (4 speakers) |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS - cellular model only |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Accelerometer, gyro, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired
2.5W reverse wired | 18W wired
5W reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | 7100 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Green, White | Gray, Gold |
| Models | E7746 | RMP2102, RMP2103 |
| Price | About 130 EUR | About 160 EUR |
| SAR | 0.57 W/kg (head) 0.96 W/kg (body) | - |
| Tests |
|---|
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1554:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-22.4 LUFS (Excellent)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 187913 (v8), 226474 (v9)
GeekBench: 1236 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 8.5fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Micromax In note 1
- More compact and portable
- Includes cellular connectivity for calls and data
- Slightly faster reverse charging (2.5W)
- Smaller display size
- Limited display specifications
- Camera details are unknown
Realme Pad
- Larger display for immersive viewing
- Measured display brightness and contrast ratio available
- Potentially longer battery life due to larger capacity
- Requires Wi-Fi for connectivity
- Slower reverse charging (5W)
- Camera specifications are unknown
Display Comparison
The Realme Pad boasts a larger display, but the Micromax In Note 1's display specifications are absent. The Realme Pad's measured 455 nits of brightness and 1554:1 contrast ratio suggest a reasonably viewable experience indoors, though it may struggle in direct sunlight. The lack of display details for the In Note 1 makes a direct comparison difficult, but given its price point, it likely features a lower brightness and contrast ratio. The Realme Pad's larger screen size is a significant advantage for media consumption and multitasking.
Camera Comparison
Camera details for both devices are limited. Given the budget nature of both, expectations should be tempered. The Realme Pad's camera specifications are not provided, while the Micromax In Note 1's are also missing. It's safe to assume both devices feature basic camera setups suitable for casual snapshots, but not for serious photography. Without sensor size or aperture information, a meaningful comparison is impossible. Focusing on image processing capabilities is also difficult without sample images.
Performance
Both devices utilize MediaTek Helio G-series chipsets, but with slight variations. The Micromax In Note 1 features the Helio G85, while the Realme Pad uses the Helio G80. Both CPUs share the same core configuration – a dual-core Cortex-A75 setup paired with a hexa-core Cortex-A55 cluster, both clocked at 2.0 GHz and 1.8 GHz respectively. The G85 generally offers a marginal performance uplift over the G80 due to slightly higher clock speeds and optimizations, potentially translating to smoother multitasking and gaming. However, the real-world difference will likely be minimal for most users. Both devices are paired with adequate RAM for their price points, but the specific RAM speed (LPDDR4x vs LPDDR5) is unknown, impacting overall system responsiveness.
Battery Life
Both the Micromax In Note 1 and Realme Pad support 18W wired charging, with the In Note 1 offering 2.5W reverse wired charging and the Pad offering 5W. The Realme Pad's larger battery capacity (not specified, but likely larger than the In Note 1 given its tablet form factor) will translate to longer battery life during typical usage scenarios like video playback. The 5W reverse charging on the Realme Pad is slightly more useful than the In Note 1's 2.5W, allowing for slower charging of accessories. The 18W charging speed on both devices is adequate but not particularly fast by today's standards.
Buying Guide
Buy the Micromax In Note 1 if you need a fully functional smartphone with calling capabilities, a compact form factor, and don't mind a smaller screen. Buy the Realme Pad if you prioritize a larger, more immersive display for video streaming, reading, and light gaming, and are comfortable relying on Wi-Fi connectivity.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Helio G80 in the Realme Pad struggle with demanding games like PUBG?
The Helio G80 is capable of running PUBG Mobile, but you'll likely need to lower the graphics settings to medium or low to achieve a consistently smooth frame rate. The chipset is designed for casual gaming, not high-end graphics performance.
❓ Is the lack of detailed camera specs a dealbreaker for the Micromax In Note 1?
If photography is a priority, the lack of information regarding the Micromax In Note 1's camera is concerning. Given its price point, expect a basic camera experience suitable for casual snapshots, but not for high-quality photos or videos.
❓ Can the Realme Pad be used for video conferencing effectively?
The larger screen of the Realme Pad makes it well-suited for video conferencing. However, the quality of the video calls will depend on the quality of the front-facing camera (specifications not provided) and the strength of your Wi-Fi connection.
❓ What type of storage does each device use, and is it expandable?
Storage type and expandability are not specified for either device. Given the budget nature of both, it's likely they utilize eMMC storage. Expandability via microSD card is common in this price range, but confirmation is needed.
