The Micromax In note 1 and Oppo F19s represent compelling options in the crowded budget smartphone market. While both aim to deliver essential features at an affordable price, they take different approaches to achieving this. The In note 1 prioritizes a larger display and potentially longer software support from an Indian brand, while the F19s focuses on a more refined Qualcomm chipset and significantly faster charging speeds.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing quick top-ups and a slightly smoother experience, the Oppo F19s is the better choice. Its Snapdragon 662 and 33W charging offer a tangible advantage over the Micromax In note 1’s Helio G85 and 18W charging, despite the In note 1’s potentially larger battery capacity.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/11.5 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat7 300/150 Mbps | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, November 03. Released 2020, November 24 | 2021, September 27 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2021, September 27 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 165.2 x 77 x 9 mm (6.50 x 3.03 x 0.35 in) | 160.3 x 73.8 x 8 mm (6.31 x 2.91 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 196 g (6.91 oz) | 175 g (6.17 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Oleophobic coating | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~84.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 450 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 800 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM6115 Snapdragon 662 (11 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Adreno 610 |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR | LED flash, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
5 MP, f/2.2, 115˚ (ultrawide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Triple | - | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, 27mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired
2.5W reverse wired | 33W wired, 54% in 30 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Green, White | Glowing Black, Glowing Gold |
| Models | E7746 | CPH2219, CPH2223 |
| Price | About 130 EUR | About 230 EUR |
| SAR | 0.57 W/kg (head) 0.96 W/kg (body) | - |
Micromax In note 1
- Potentially larger battery capacity
- Support for Indian brand and software updates
- Likely larger display size for media consumption
- Slower 18W charging
- Less efficient MediaTek Helio G85 chipset
- Potentially lower image processing quality
Oppo F19s
- Faster 33W charging (54% in 30 mins)
- More efficient Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 chipset
- Potentially better image processing
- Potentially smaller battery capacity
- Reliance on a Chinese brand
- May have a smaller display size
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Both likely utilize LCD panels, common in this price bracket. The focus here isn't on cutting-edge tech like OLED or high refresh rates. The In note 1’s larger size (spec not provided, but assumed larger based on branding) will benefit media viewers, but without knowing the resolution or peak brightness, it’s difficult to assess image quality. The F19s, while potentially smaller, benefits from Qualcomm’s image signal processor which may offer slightly better color calibration.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed sensor information, a direct camera comparison is challenging. However, the market segment suggests both phones will rely on primary sensors around the 13-48MP range. The Oppo F19s likely benefits from Qualcomm’s image processing capabilities, potentially delivering more consistent and vibrant photos. The In note 1 may attempt to compensate with software enhancements, but the underlying hardware advantage leans towards the F19s. It's safe to assume both will include basic portrait modes and low-light features, but image quality will likely be noticeably better on the Oppo.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo F19s’ Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (11nm) is built on a smaller process node than the Micromax In note 1’s MediaTek Helio G85 (12nm). This translates to better power efficiency and potentially less thermal throttling under sustained load. While both CPUs feature octa-core configurations with similar clock speeds on their performance cores (2.0 GHz), the Snapdragon 662’s Kryo cores are generally more efficient than the Cortex-A75 cores in the Helio G85. This means the F19s will likely handle multitasking and demanding apps with greater ease. The 11nm process also contributes to better battery life during typical usage.
Battery Life
The Micromax In note 1 likely has a larger battery capacity (spec not provided), but the Oppo F19s’ 33W charging is a game-changer. The F19s can achieve a 54% charge in just 30 minutes, a significant advantage for users who need a quick power boost. The In note 1’s 18W charging is comparatively slow. While a larger battery *could* translate to longer overall runtime, the F19s’ faster charging mitigates the impact of a potentially smaller battery, making it more convenient for daily use. The efficiency of the Snapdragon 662 also contributes to better battery life per charge.
Buying Guide
Buy the Micromax In note 1 if you need a large screen for media consumption and value the backing of an Indian brand with potentially longer software update commitments. Buy the Oppo F19s if you prioritize faster charging, a more efficient chipset for everyday tasks, and a generally more polished user experience, even if it means sacrificing some potential battery longevity.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 662 in the Oppo F19s handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile smoothly?
The Snapdragon 662 is capable of running PUBG Mobile, but you'll likely need to stick to medium graphics settings for a consistently smooth experience. While not a gaming powerhouse, it offers a noticeable improvement over the Helio G85 in sustained performance, reducing the likelihood of frame drops during longer gaming sessions.
❓ Does the Micromax In note 1 support reverse charging, and is it useful?
Yes, the Micromax In note 1 supports 2.5W reverse wired charging. However, at this wattage, it's primarily useful for topping up accessories like wireless earbuds or smartwatches – it won't significantly charge another phone. The Oppo F19s does not offer reverse charging.
❓ How does the 11nm process of the Snapdragon 662 impact real-world battery life compared to the 12nm Helio G85?
The smaller 11nm process node of the Snapdragon 662 is more power-efficient. This means the F19s will consume less power for the same tasks, resulting in longer battery life during typical usage. While the In note 1 might have a larger battery capacity, the F19s’ chipset efficiency will likely close the gap, and potentially surpass it, in real-world scenarios.
