The Micromax In Note 1 and Maxwest Gravity 5.5 LTE represent different eras of the budget smartphone market. The In Note 1, released more recently, aims to deliver modern features at an accessible price. The Gravity 5.5 LTE, while older, offers a baseline Android experience. This comparison dissects their core components to determine which device provides the best value for today's user.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the vast majority of users, the Micromax In Note 1 is the clear winner. Its significantly more powerful Mediatek Helio G85 chipset, coupled with a more modern CPU architecture, provides a substantially smoother and more responsive experience. While the Maxwest Gravity 5.5 LTE may be cheaper, the performance deficit is too large to ignore.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 | 2, 4, 7, 17 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/11.5 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat7 300/150 Mbps | HSPA 21.1/5.76 Mbps, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, November 03. Released 2020, November 24 | 2015, June. Released 2015, September |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 165.2 x 77 x 9 mm (6.50 x 3.03 x 0.35 in) | 155.5 x 78 x 7.5 mm (6.12 x 3.07 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Dual SIM (Dual stand-by) |
| Weight | 196 g (6.91 oz) | 165 g (5.82 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Oleophobic coating | Scratch-resistant glass |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 720 x 1280 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~267 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~84.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 5.5 inches, 83.4 cm2 (~68.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 450 nits (peak) | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Quad-core 1.0 GHz Cortex-A53 |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6735 (28 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Mali-T720MP2 |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 5.1 (Lollipop) |
| Memory |
|---|
| Call records | - | 20 dialed, 20 received, 20 missed calls |
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDHC |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM | 8GB 1GB RAM |
| Phonebook | - | 1000 entries, Photocall |
| | eMMC 5.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR | LED flash |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
5 MP, f/2.2, 115˚ (ultrawide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Single | - | 13 MP, AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, 27mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | 5 MP |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | - |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Alert types | - | Vibration; Downloadable polyphonic, MP3, video ringtones ringtones |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 4.0, A2DP |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS |
| Radio | FM radio | Stereo FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | microUSB 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, hotspot |
| Features |
|---|
| Browser | - | WAP 2.0/xHTML, Adobe Flash Lite |
| Games | - | Yes + Downloadable |
| Java | - | Yes, MIDP 2.1 |
| Messaging | - | SMS, MMS, Email, IM |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired
2.5W reverse wired | - |
| Stand-by | - | Up to 350 h |
| Talk time | - | Up to 14 h |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Ion 3000 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Green, White | Black, Gold, Silver |
| Models | E7746 | - |
| Price | About 130 EUR | About 840 EUR |
| SAR | 0.57 W/kg (head) 0.96 W/kg (body) | - |
| Tests |
|---|
| Loudspeaker | - |
Voice 66dB / Noise 66dB / Ring 66dB
|
Micromax In note 1
- Significantly faster processor (Helio G85)
- More efficient chipset (12nm vs 28nm)
- Faster charging (18W)
- Modern CPU architecture (Cortex-A75)
- May be slightly more expensive
- Camera performance is not flagship-level
Maxwest Gravity 5.5 LTE
- Potentially lower price point
- Basic Android functionality
- Simple and straightforward user experience
- Very slow processor (MT6735)
- Inefficient chipset (28nm)
- Likely limited software support
- Poor multitasking performance
Display Comparison
Detailed display specifications are unavailable for the Maxwest Gravity 5.5 LTE. However, given its market positioning, it likely features a lower resolution and less color accurate panel than the Micromax In Note 1. The key difference lies in processing power to drive the display. The Helio G85 in the In Note 1 has a dedicated GPU capable of smoother animations and faster rendering, even if the panel specs were identical. The older MT6735 will struggle to deliver a fluid visual experience.
Camera Comparison
Camera details for the Maxwest Gravity 5.5 LTE are scarce. It's reasonable to assume it features a lower-resolution sensor and lacks advanced features like phase detection autofocus. The Micromax In Note 1, while not a camera powerhouse, benefits from the Helio G85’s image signal processor (ISP), which enables better image processing and noise reduction. While neither phone will compete with flagship camera systems, the In Note 1 will likely produce sharper, more detailed photos, especially in good lighting conditions. The ISP also aids in faster image capture and processing speeds.
Performance
The performance gap between these two devices is substantial. The Micromax In Note 1’s Mediatek Helio G85, built on a 12nm process, features an octa-core CPU with a mix of Cortex-A75 and A55 cores clocked up to 2.0 GHz. This is a significant leap over the Maxwest Gravity 5.5 LTE’s quad-core 1.0 GHz Cortex-A53 processor, fabricated on a much older 28nm node. The 28nm process is less efficient, leading to higher power consumption and potentially more heat. The Helio G85’s architecture allows for faster app launches, smoother multitasking, and a more enjoyable gaming experience. The A75 cores provide a performance boost for demanding tasks, while the A55 cores handle background processes efficiently. The Gravity 5.5 LTE will exhibit noticeable lag and slowdowns even with a few apps open.
Battery Life
Battery capacity details for the Maxwest Gravity 5.5 LTE are unavailable. The Micromax In Note 1 offers 18W wired charging and 2.5W reverse wired charging. The older MT6735 processor in the Gravity 5.5 LTE is less power-efficient, meaning it will likely drain the battery faster under similar usage scenarios. While the In Note 1’s battery capacity isn’t exceptionally large, the more efficient chipset and faster charging capabilities provide a practical advantage. The 18W charging will significantly reduce downtime compared to the likely slower charging speeds of the Gravity 5.5 LTE.
Buying Guide
Buy the Micromax In Note 1 if you prioritize a responsive user experience, occasional gaming, and future-proofing. Its Helio G85 chipset will handle everyday tasks and even some demanding applications with ease. Buy the Maxwest Gravity 5.5 LTE if your needs are extremely basic – primarily calls, texts, and light web browsing – and you are on a severely restricted budget where every dollar counts. Be prepared for noticeable slowdowns with even moderate multitasking.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Micromax In Note 1 be able to handle popular games like PUBG Mobile or Call of Duty?
The Helio G85 in the Micromax In Note 1 is capable of running PUBG Mobile and Call of Duty at medium settings with reasonable frame rates. While it won't deliver a flagship gaming experience, it provides a playable experience for casual gamers. The Maxwest Gravity 5.5 LTE's MT6735 would struggle significantly with these titles, likely resulting in unplayable frame rates and frequent lag.
❓ How much of a difference will I notice in everyday tasks like browsing the web and using social media?
The difference will be very noticeable. The Micromax In Note 1’s Helio G85 will launch apps faster, load web pages quicker, and provide a smoother scrolling experience. The Maxwest Gravity 5.5 LTE’s older processor will exhibit noticeable lag and slowdowns, making even basic tasks feel sluggish. This is due to the architectural advantages of the newer chipset and its more efficient processing capabilities.
❓ Is the Maxwest Gravity 5.5 LTE a good option for someone who only needs a phone for calls and texts?
If your sole requirements are calls and texts, and budget is the absolute primary concern, the Maxwest Gravity 5.5 LTE *could* suffice. However, even for basic communication, the Micromax In Note 1 offers a more reliable and responsive experience. The performance difference is significant enough to justify the potential price difference, even for minimal usage.
