Both the Micromax In note 1 and Lava Blaze 5G target the increasingly competitive budget 5G smartphone market. While both aim to deliver 5G connectivity at an accessible price, they take different approaches to achieving this. The In note 1 prioritizes a larger feature set and slightly more refined design, while the Blaze 5G focuses on delivering a more modern chipset for improved performance. This comparison will dissect the key differences to help you determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Lava Blaze 5G emerges as the better choice. Its Mediatek Dimensity 700 chipset, built on a more efficient 7nm process, provides a noticeable performance advantage over the Micromax In note 1’s Helio G85, especially in demanding tasks and 5G connectivity. While the In note 1 offers 18W charging, the Blaze 5G’s superior processor outweighs this advantage.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 900 / 1800 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | - | SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/11.5 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat7 300/150 Mbps | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, November 03. Released 2020, November 24 | 2022, October 3 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2022, October 24 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 165.2 x 77 x 9 mm (6.50 x 3.03 x 0.35 in) | 165.3 x 76.4 x 8.9 mm (6.51 x 3.01 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 196 g (6.91 oz) | 207 g (7.30 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Oleophobic coating | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~84.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~81.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 450 nits (peak) | IPS LCD, 90Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 (12 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 12 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
5 MP, f/2.2, 115˚ (ultrawide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Single | - | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, (wide), 0.64µm, AF
2 MP (macro)
0.3 MP |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, 27mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | Yes |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired
2.5W reverse wired | 10W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Green, White | Green, Blue |
| Models | E7746 | LXX503 |
| Price | About 130 EUR | About 130 EUR |
| SAR | 0.57 W/kg (head) 0.96 W/kg (body) | - |
Micromax In note 1
- Faster 18W wired charging
- 2.5W reverse wired charging for accessories
- Potentially larger display size
- Less efficient Helio G85 chipset
- Likely lower performance in demanding tasks
- Older 12nm manufacturing process
Lava Blaze 5G
- More efficient Dimensity 700 chipset (7nm)
- Superior CPU performance with Cortex-A76 cores
- Better 5G connectivity and speeds
- Slower 10W wired charging
- No reverse wired charging
- Potentially shorter battery life during heavy usage (offset by efficiency)
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Both likely utilize IPS LCD panels, a common choice in this price bracket. However, the lack of detailed display specifications (resolution, peak brightness, color gamut) makes a direct comparison difficult. The In note 1’s larger size *may* offer a more immersive viewing experience, but without knowing the panel quality, it’s speculative. Bezels are likely comparable, reflecting the budget nature of both devices.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs beyond the chipsets, a thorough camera comparison is impossible. Both phones likely feature a primary camera and depth/macro sensors. The absence of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on either device suggests image stabilization will rely on software processing. The Dimensity 700’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) *may* offer slightly better image processing capabilities, but the actual image quality will heavily depend on the sensor used and software tuning. We can assume the 2MP macro cameras on both devices will offer limited utility.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Lava Blaze 5G’s Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7nm) is a significant upgrade over the Micromax In note 1’s Helio G85 (12nm). The 7nm process inherently offers better power efficiency and thermal performance, meaning the Blaze 5G is less likely to throttle under sustained load. The Dimensity 700’s CPU – featuring 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 cores – also outperforms the In note 1’s 2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 cores. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive user experience. While both have octa-core CPUs, the architectural improvements in the Dimensity 700 are substantial.
Battery Life
The Micromax In note 1’s 18W wired charging is a clear advantage over the Lava Blaze 5G’s 10W charging. However, the Dimensity 700’s superior power efficiency could offset this difference in real-world usage. The Helio G85, being built on a larger 12nm node, will consume more power for the same tasks. While the In note 1 might charge faster, the Blaze 5G could potentially offer longer battery life on a single charge, especially during 5G usage.
Buying Guide
Buy the Micromax In note 1 if you prioritize reverse wired charging for topping up accessories and a slightly more established brand presence. It’s a solid all-rounder for basic smartphone tasks. Buy the Lava Blaze 5G if you value smoother performance in apps, better 5G speeds, and a more modern chipset architecture, making it ideal for users who occasionally game or stream content.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Lava Blaze 5G’s Dimensity 700 handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile smoothly?
The Dimensity 700 is capable of running PUBG Mobile at medium settings with reasonable frame rates. While it won’t deliver a flagship gaming experience, it offers a significant improvement over the Helio G85 in the Micromax In note 1, providing a more stable and enjoyable gaming experience. Expect to adjust graphics settings for optimal performance.
❓ Does the Micromax In note 1’s 18W charging significantly reduce charging time compared to the Lava Blaze 5G’s 10W charging?
Yes, 18W charging is noticeably faster than 10W. However, the Dimensity 700’s power efficiency in the Blaze 5G means it may not require charging as frequently. Expect the In note 1 to go from 0-100% in approximately 2.5-3 hours, while the Blaze 5G will likely take 3.5-4 hours.
❓ How will the 5G experience differ between the two phones?
The Lava Blaze 5G, powered by the Dimensity 700, will generally offer faster and more stable 5G connections. The Dimensity 700 has a more advanced 5G modem, leading to better signal reception and data speeds compared to the Helio G85 in the Micromax In note 1. This is particularly noticeable in areas with weaker 5G coverage.
