The budget smartphone market is fiercely competitive, offering incredible value for money. Today, we're pitting two contenders against each other: the Micromax In 2c and the Xiaomi Poco C50. Both promise affordability, but which one delivers the better overall experience?
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Micromax In 2c edges out the Poco C50 thanks to its superior chipset and octa-core CPU, resulting in noticeably smoother performance. While both offer basic features, the In 2c's processing power makes it the more capable choice for everyday tasks and light gaming.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, April 26 | 2023, January 03 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, May 01 | Available. Released 2023, January 10 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 164.3 x 75.7 x 8.6 mm (6.47 x 2.98 x 0.34 in) | 164.9 x 76.8 x 9.1 mm (6.49 x 3.02 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 198 g (6.98 oz) | 192 g (6.77 oz) |
| | - | Dust & splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~82.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~81.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 420 nits | IPS LCD, 400 nits |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Quad-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 |
| Chipset | Unisoc T610 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6761 Helio A22 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MP2 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 12 (Go edition) |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 32GB 3GB RAM | 32GB 2GB RAM, 32GB 3GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 8 MP, (wide), AF
Auxiliary lens | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide)
0.08 MP (depth) |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR |
| Single | 5 MP, AF | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 5 MP, AF | 5 MP, f/2.0 |
| Video | Unspecified | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | No | FM radio, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | microUSB 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 10W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Brown, Silver | Country Green, Royal Blue |
| Models | E6533 | MZB0D3DIN, 220733SPI, 220733SPH |
| Price | About 100 EUR | About 80 EUR |
| SAR | - | 0.87 W/kg (head) 0.84 W/kg (body) |
Micromax In 2c
- Better Performance (Octa-Core CPU)
- Potentially better camera (50MP)
- Slightly more modern design
- 10W charging is slow
- Build quality might be basic
- Software updates may be infrequent
Xiaomi Poco C50
- Lower price point
- Xiaomi's MIUI software (generally well-supported)
- Decent battery life
- Slower performance (Quad-Core CPU)
- Less detailed camera
- Basic design
Display Comparison
Both phones feature a large 6.53-inch HD+ display, offering decent viewing angles for the price. However, the In 2c might have slightly better color accuracy due to potentially better panel technology, though this is difficult to confirm without detailed testing. Expect similar brightness levels on both.
Camera Comparison
The Micromax In 2c typically features a 50MP main camera, while the Poco C50 often has a 13MP main camera. While megapixels aren't everything, the In 2c likely captures more detailed images in good lighting conditions. Both phones will struggle in low light, and video recording quality will be basic on both.
Performance
This is where the Micromax In 2c shines. Its Unisoc T610 chipset with an octa-core CPU significantly outperforms the Poco C50's Helio A22 quad-core processor. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and a more responsive user interface on the In 2c. The Poco C50 will feel noticeably slower, especially with demanding apps.
Battery Life
Both devices are expected to have a 5000mAh battery, providing all-day battery life for moderate users. Charging speeds are identical at 10W, meaning charging will take a considerable amount of time.
Buying Guide
The Micromax In 2c is ideal for users prioritizing performance and a slightly more modern experience on a tight budget. The Xiaomi Poco C50 is a good option for those seeking the absolute lowest price point and primarily need a phone for basic calling, texting, and occasional social media browsing.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone is better for gaming?
The Micromax In 2c is significantly better for gaming due to its more powerful chipset and octa-core CPU. The Poco C50 will struggle with even basic games.
❓ Which phone has better software support?
The Xiaomi Poco C50 likely has better software support due to Xiaomi's established track record of providing updates for their devices. Micromax's update history is less consistent.
