The budget smartphone market is fiercely competitive, with new contenders constantly vying for your attention. Today, we're pitting two popular options against each other: the Micromax In 2c and the Realme Narzo 50i. Both promise affordability, but which one delivers the best overall experience?
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Realme Narzo 50i edges out the Micromax In 2c thanks to its slightly better overall performance and reverse charging capability. While the In 2c boasts a more powerful chipset on paper, the Narzo 50i's optimized software and features make it a more compelling choice for most users in this price range.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, April 26 | 2021, September 24 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, May 01 | Available. Released 2021, October 07 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 164.3 x 75.7 x 8.6 mm (6.47 x 2.98 x 0.34 in) | 165.2 x 76.4 x 8.9 mm (6.50 x 3.01 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 198 g (6.98 oz) | 195 g (6.88 oz) |
| | - | Splash-resistant design |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~82.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~80.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 420 nits | IPS LCD, 400 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core 1.6 GHz |
| Chipset | Unisoc T610 (12 nm) | - |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MP2 | IMG8322 |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 11, Realme Go UI |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 32GB 3GB RAM | 32GB 2GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 8 MP, (wide), AF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 5 MP, AF | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 5 MP, AF | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide) |
| Video | Unspecified | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 4.2, A2DP |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | microUSB 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity | Accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | Reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Brown, Silver | Carbon Black, Mint Green |
| Models | E6533 | RMX3235 |
| Price | About 100 EUR | About 90 EUR |
Micromax In 2c
- Potentially faster chipset (on paper)
- Larger display
- 50MP primary camera
- Slower charging speed
- Software optimization could be better
- Less polished design
Realme Narzo 50i
- Reverse charging capability
- Optimized software for smoother performance
- User-friendly interface
- Slightly better display calibration
- Lower resolution primary camera (13MP)
- Potentially less raw processing power
Display Comparison
Both phones feature a 6.5-inch HD+ display, offering decent viewing angles and color reproduction for everyday use. However, the Realme Narzo 50i's display might have slightly better calibration and brightness, leading to a marginally better viewing experience. The In 2c's display is adequate but not exceptional.
Camera Comparison
The Micromax In 2c typically features a 50MP primary camera, while the Realme Narzo 50i often has a 13MP primary camera. Image quality is generally comparable in good lighting conditions, but the Narzo 50i's image processing might produce slightly more vibrant and appealing photos. Low-light performance is expected to be average on both devices.
Performance
The Micromax In 2c utilizes a Unisoc T610 chipset with Cortex-A75 cores, theoretically offering better performance than the Narzo 50i's unspecified octa-core processor. However, Realme's optimized software often results in smoother performance in real-world usage. Gaming performance will be adequate on both, but don't expect high frame rates on demanding titles.
Battery Life
Both phones pack a 5000mAh battery, promising all-day battery life. The Realme Narzo 50i's inclusion of reverse charging is a significant advantage, allowing you to charge other devices in a pinch. The Micromax In 2c's 10W charging is slower than the Narzo 50i's charging speed.
Buying Guide
The Micromax In 2c is a good option for users prioritizing raw processing power and a larger display. The Realme Narzo 50i is ideal for those seeking a well-rounded experience with a focus on battery life, reverse charging, and a user-friendly interface.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone is better for gaming?
While the Micromax In 2c has a theoretically more powerful chipset, the Realme Narzo 50i's optimized software often translates to a smoother gaming experience. Both are suitable for casual gaming.
❓ Can the Realme Narzo 50i charge other phones?
Yes, the Realme Narzo 50i supports reverse wired charging, allowing you to use it as a power bank for other devices.
