The budget smartphone market is fiercely competitive, with new contenders constantly vying for attention. Today, we're pitting two popular options against each other: the Micromax In 2c and the Nokia C12 Pro. Both promise affordability, but which delivers the better overall experience?
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Micromax In 2c edges out the Nokia C12 Pro thanks to its more powerful chipset and generally smoother performance. While both are budget devices, the In 2c offers a slightly better user experience for the price, making it the preferred choice for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | LTE |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, April 26 | 2023, March 21 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, May 01 | Available. Released 2023, March 21 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164.3 x 75.7 x 8.6 mm (6.47 x 2.98 x 0.34 in) | 160.6 x 74.3 x 8.8 mm (6.32 x 2.93 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 198 g (6.98 oz) | 177.4 g (6.24 oz) |
| | - | Splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Scratch-resistant glass |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~278 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~82.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.3 inches, 95.8 cm2 (~80.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 420 nits | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Unisoc T610 (12 nm) | Unisoc SC9863A1 (22 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MP2 | IMG8322 |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 12 (Go edition) |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | Unspecified |
| Internal | 32GB 3GB RAM | 64GB 2GB RAM, 64GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 8 MP, (wide), AF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR |
| Single | 5 MP, AF | 8 MP, AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | Yes |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 5 MP, AF | 5 MP |
| Video | Unspecified | 720p |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS |
| Radio | No | Wireless FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | microUSB 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity | Accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 10W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Ion 4000 mAh, removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Brown, Silver | Dark Cyan, Charcoal, Light Mint |
| Models | E6533 | - |
| Price | About 100 EUR | About 80 EUR |
Micromax In 2c
- More powerful chipset
- Smoother performance
- Potentially better display calibration
- Good battery life
- 10W charging is slow
- Camera performance is average
- Build quality might not be as premium as Nokia
Nokia C12 Pro
- Nokia brand reputation for durability
- Clean Android experience
- Good battery life
- Reliable software updates (potentially)
- Slower performance
- Less responsive
- Basic display
- 10W charging is slow
Display Comparison
Both phones feature similar, basic LCD displays, likely around 6.5 inches with HD+ resolution. Expect decent viewing angles but limited brightness and color accuracy. The Micromax In 2c might have a slightly better panel due to potentially better calibration, but the difference will be minimal.
Camera Comparison
Camera specs are likely similar – both will feature a primary rear camera around 13MP, potentially with a depth sensor. Image quality will be adequate in good lighting conditions, but expect noise and limited detail in low light. The Micromax In 2c might have slightly better image processing algorithms, resulting in marginally better photos, but don't expect a significant difference.
Performance
This is where the Micromax In 2c takes a clear lead. Its Unisoc T610 chipset, built on a 12nm process, offers a more powerful CPU and GPU compared to the Nokia C12 Pro's Unisoc SC9863A1 (22nm). Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better gaming performance on the In 2c. The C12 Pro will feel noticeably slower, especially with demanding apps.
Battery Life
Both phones are expected to have a battery capacity around 5000mAh, offering all-day battery life with moderate usage. Charging speeds are identical at 10W wired, which is relatively slow by today's standards.
Buying Guide
The Micromax In 2c is ideal for users prioritizing performance and a slightly more responsive experience on a tight budget. The Nokia C12 Pro is a good choice for those who value the Nokia brand's reputation for durability and a clean Android experience, even if it means sacrificing some processing power.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone has better software support?
Nokia generally provides more consistent and timely software updates, including security patches, compared to Micromax. This is a significant advantage for long-term usability.
❓ Can I play games on these phones?
While both phones can handle basic games, the Micromax In 2c will offer a noticeably better gaming experience due to its more powerful chipset. Don't expect to play demanding games at high settings on either device.
