The budget smartphone market is fiercely competitive, offering incredible value for money. Today, we're pitting two contenders against each other: the Micromax In 2b and the Xiaomi Poco C55. Both promise a lot for their price point, but which one delivers the better overall experience?
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Xiaomi Poco C55 edges out the Micromax In 2b thanks to its slightly more powerful Helio G85 chipset, resulting in smoother performance. While both offer decent value, the Poco C55's improved processing power makes it the preferable choice for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, July 30. Released 2021, August 06 | 2023, February 21 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2023, February 28 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Panda Glass), eco leather back |
| Dimensions | 164.3 x 75.7 x 8.6 mm (6.47 x 2.98 x 0.34 in) | 168.8 x 76.4 x 8.8 mm (6.65 x 3.01 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 190 g (6.70 oz) | 192 g (6.77 oz) |
| | - | Dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Panda Glass |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 720 x 1650 pixels (~268 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~82.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.71 inches, 106.5 cm2 (~82.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 400 nits (typ) | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Unisoc T610 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MP2 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 12, MIUI 13 for POCO |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
0.08 MP (depth) |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2 | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2 | 5 MP |
| Video | Unspecified | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | Unspecified | FM radio, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | microUSB 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 10W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Blue, Black, Green | Cool Blue, Power Black, Forest Green |
| Models | E7544 | 22127PC95I |
| Price | About 90 EUR | About 110 EUR |
| SAR | 0.85 W/kg (head) 1.13 W/kg (body) | 0.87 W/kg (head) 0.77 W/kg (body) |
Micromax In 2b
- Reliable brand
- Simple and easy to use
- Decent battery life
- Less powerful chipset
- Slow charging
- Basic camera system
Xiaomi Poco C55
- More powerful chipset (Helio G85)
- Potentially better camera
- Likely 90Hz display
- Slow charging
- Design may be less appealing to some
- Xiaomi's MIUI can be bloated
Display Comparison
Both phones likely feature similar LCD displays, probably around 6.5 inches with an HD+ resolution. Expect decent viewing angles and color accuracy for the price, but don't anticipate flagship-level vibrancy. The Poco C55 might have a slightly higher refresh rate (90Hz vs 60Hz on the In 2b) leading to smoother scrolling.
Camera Comparison
The Poco C55 likely boasts a more versatile camera system, potentially including a higher resolution main sensor and additional lenses (macro, depth). While both phones will produce acceptable photos in good lighting conditions, the Poco C55 should offer better low-light performance and more creative shooting options. Expect both to have a basic front-facing camera.
Performance
This is where the Poco C55 has a clear advantage. The Helio G85 chipset is generally more powerful than the Unisoc T610. Expect better gaming performance and snappier app loading times on the Poco C55. The In 2b will handle everyday tasks adequately, but may struggle with more demanding applications.
Battery Life
Both phones share the same 10W charging, which is relatively slow by today's standards. Battery capacity is likely similar, around 5000mAh for both, suggesting comparable battery life under typical usage. Charging will take a considerable amount of time for both.
Buying Guide
The Micromax In 2b is a good option for users prioritizing a simple, reliable phone for basic tasks like calling, texting, and light social media. The Xiaomi Poco C55 is ideal for those seeking a bit more performance for gaming, multitasking, and a generally more responsive user experience.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone is better for gaming?
The Xiaomi Poco C55 is significantly better for gaming due to its more powerful Helio G85 chipset.
❓ How long does the battery last on each phone?
Both phones likely offer all-day battery life with moderate usage, but charging will be slow with the 10W charger.
❓ Which phone has a better camera?
The Xiaomi Poco C55 is expected to have a better camera system, offering more features and potentially better image quality.
❓ Is the Micromax In 2b worth buying?
The Micromax In 2b is a decent option for basic users on a tight budget, but the Poco C55 offers more value overall.
