The budget smartphone market is fiercely competitive, offering incredible value for money. Today, we're pitting two contenders against each other: the Micromax In 2b and the Realme Narzo N55. Both promise a lot, but which one delivers the best overall experience?
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Realme Narzo N55 emerges as the clear winner. Its significantly faster charging, slightly better chipset, and generally more refined software experience outweigh the Micromax In 2b's potential cost savings. While the In 2b is a decent option, the N55 offers a more compelling package.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, July 30. Released 2021, August 06 | 2023, April 12 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2023, April 13 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164.3 x 75.7 x 8.6 mm (6.47 x 2.98 x 0.34 in) | 165.6 x 75.9 x 7.9 mm (6.52 x 2.99 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 190 g (6.70 oz) | 189.5 g (6.70 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~392 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~82.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.72 inches, 109.0 cm2 (~86.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 400 nits (typ) | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 680 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Unisoc T610 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6769H Helio G88 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MP2 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 13, Realme UI 4.0 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2 | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2 | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | Unspecified | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 33W wired, 50% in 29 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Blue, Black, Green | Prime Black, Prime Blue |
| Models | E7544 | - |
| Price | About 90 EUR | About 120 EUR |
| SAR | 0.85 W/kg (head) 1.13 W/kg (body) | - |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 123h
|
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1264:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-31.8 LUFS (Below average)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 257263 (v9)
GeekBench: 1452 (v5.1), 1413 (v6)
GFXBench: 9fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Micromax In 2b
- Potentially lower price
- Decent for basic tasks
- Reliable brand (in some regions)
- Slower performance
- Slow charging (10W)
- Likely inferior camera
- Less refined software
Realme Narzo N55
- Faster performance (Helio G88)
- Fast charging (33W)
- Better camera quality
- Improved display
- Longer battery life
- Slightly higher price
- Realme UI can be polarizing
Display Comparison
Both phones feature a nominal contrast ratio of 1264:1, suggesting decent image quality. However, the Narzo N55 likely has better color accuracy and brightness due to Realme's generally higher display standards. The In 2b's display is likely adequate but not exceptional.
Camera Comparison
While specific camera specs are limited, the Realme Narzo N55 generally has a reputation for better camera performance in its price range. Expect improved image processing, better low-light performance, and potentially more features. The Micromax In 2b's camera is likely adequate for casual snapshots.
Performance
The Realme Narzo N55's MediaTek Helio G88 chipset offers a noticeable performance advantage over the Unisoc T610 in the Micromax In 2b. The G88's higher clock speeds and slightly more modern architecture translate to smoother multitasking, faster app loading, and better gaming performance. The In 2b will handle basic tasks fine, but will struggle with demanding applications.
Battery Life
The Narzo N55 boasts an impressive endurance rating of 123h, suggesting excellent battery life. Coupled with its 33W fast charging, it can be quickly topped up. The In 2b's 10W charging is significantly slower, and while battery life is likely decent, it won't match the Narzo N55's longevity.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the Micromax In 2b? Those on the absolute tightest budget who prioritize basic functionality and are willing to compromise on performance and charging speed. Who should buy the Realme Narzo N55? Anyone seeking a well-rounded budget phone with fast charging, a decent display, and a smoother user experience.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Micromax In 2b good for gaming?
The Micromax In 2b can handle basic games, but it will struggle with more demanding titles due to its less powerful chipset. The Realme Narzo N55 is a better choice for gaming.
❓ How long does it take to fully charge the Realme Narzo N55?
The Realme Narzo N55 can charge to 50% in approximately 29 minutes with its 33W fast charging.
