The budget smartphone market is fiercely competitive, offering incredible value for your money. Today, we're pitting two contenders against each other: the Micromax In 2b and the Motorola Moto G32. Both promise a lot, but which one delivers the best overall experience?
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Motorola Moto G32 emerges as the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 680 chipset offers significantly better performance, faster charging (30W vs 10W), and a generally more refined software experience. While the Micromax In 2b might be slightly more affordable, the Moto G32's advantages outweigh the price difference.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, July 30. Released 2021, August 06 | 2022, July 28 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2022, August 16 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164.3 x 75.7 x 8.6 mm (6.47 x 2.98 x 0.34 in) | 161.8 x 73.8 x 8.5 mm (6.37 x 2.91 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 190 g (6.70 oz) | 184 g (6.49 oz) |
| | - | Water-repellent design |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~82.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~85.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 400 nits (typ) | IPS LCD, 90Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) |
| Chipset | Unisoc T610 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MP2 | Adreno 610 |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2 | - |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8 (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP, f/2.4, (macro/depth) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2 | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1.0µm |
| Video | Unspecified | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | Unspecified | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 30W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Blue, Black, Green | Mineral Grey, Satin Silver, Rose Gold |
| Models | E7544 | XT2235-2, XT2235-3 |
| Price | About 90 EUR | ₹ 8,990 |
| SAR | 0.85 W/kg (head) 1.13 W/kg (body) | - |
Micromax In 2b
- Large Display
- Affordable Price
- Decent Battery Life
- Weak Performance
- Slow Charging
- Subpar Camera
Motorola Moto G32
- Smooth 120Hz Display
- Faster Performance (Snapdragon 680)
- Fast Charging (30W)
- Better Camera
- Slightly Higher Price
- Design may not appeal to everyone
Display Comparison
Both phones feature a 6.5-inch display, but the Moto G32 boasts a 120Hz refresh rate, offering a noticeably smoother scrolling and gaming experience compared to the In 2b's standard refresh rate. The Moto G32 also likely has better color accuracy and brightness.
Camera Comparison
The Moto G32 generally offers superior camera performance. While both have multiple rear cameras, the Moto G32's image processing and sensor quality are likely better, resulting in sharper, more detailed photos, especially in low light. The In 2b's camera is acceptable for casual snapshots.
Performance
The Snapdragon 680 in the Moto G32 is a significant upgrade over the Unisoc T610 in the In 2b. Expect faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance on the Moto G32. The Unisoc chipset is adequate for basic tasks but struggles with more demanding applications.
Battery Life
Both phones have a similar battery capacity (around 5000mAh), but the Moto G32's 30W fast charging significantly reduces charging times compared to the In 2b's 10W charging. This is a crucial advantage for users who value convenience.
Buying Guide
The Micromax In 2b is a decent option for users on an extremely tight budget who prioritize basic functionality and a large display. The Motorola Moto G32 is ideal for those seeking a smoother, faster experience, better camera performance, and quicker charging, even if it means spending a bit more.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Micromax In 2b good for gaming?
The Micromax In 2b can handle basic games, but it will struggle with more demanding titles due to its weaker chipset. The Motorola Moto G32 is a better choice for gaming.
❓ How long does the battery last on each phone?
Both phones offer all-day battery life with moderate usage. However, the Moto G32 charges much faster thanks to its 30W charging.
❓ Which phone has better software support?
Motorola is known for its near-stock Android experience and generally provides timely software updates. Micromax's software support is less consistent.
