The budget smartphone market is fiercely competitive, with manufacturers constantly vying for your attention. Today, we're pitting two contenders against each other: the Micromax In 2b and the Motorola Moto E13. Both promise affordability, but which one delivers the better overall experience?
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Micromax In 2b edges out the Moto E13 thanks to its slightly more powerful chipset and potentially better software support. While both are budget options, the In 2b offers a small performance advantage that justifies its consideration, especially if available at a similar price.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, July 30. Released 2021, August 06 | 2023, January 24 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2023, February 13 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164.3 x 75.7 x 8.6 mm (6.47 x 2.98 x 0.34 in) | 164.2 x 75 x 8.5 mm (6.46 x 2.95 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 190 g (6.70 oz) | 179.5 g (6.35 oz) |
| | - | Water-resistant design |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~82.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~82.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 400 nits (typ) | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Unisoc T610 (12 nm) | Unisoc T606 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MP2 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 13 (Go edition) |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM | 32GB 2GB RAM, 64GB 2GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2 | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.12µm, PDAF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2 | 5 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | Unspecified | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | Unspecified | FM radio, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 10W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Blue, Black, Green | Cosmic Black, Creamy White, Aurora Green |
| Models | E7544 | - |
| Price | About 90 EUR | $ 119.99 / € 104.99 |
| SAR | 0.85 W/kg (head) 1.13 W/kg (body) | - |
Micromax In 2b
- Slightly more powerful chipset
- Potentially better software support (Micromax improving)
- Competitive price
- 10W charging is slow
- Camera performance may be inconsistent
- Brand reputation less established than Motorola
Motorola Moto E13
- Clean Android experience
- Reliable software updates
- Good battery life
- Reputable brand
- Slightly less powerful chipset
- 10W charging is slow
- Camera performance may be inconsistent
Display Comparison
Both phones likely feature similar 6.5-inch HD+ displays. Expect decent viewing angles and color reproduction for everyday use, but don't anticipate flagship-level quality. The Moto E13 might have a slightly more refined display calibration due to Motorola's reputation.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is likely comparable. Both phones probably feature a primary 50MP camera, supplemented by depth and macro sensors. Image quality will depend heavily on software processing. Motorola often delivers a more natural image processing style, while Micromax might prioritize vibrant colors. Expect decent photos in good lighting conditions, but struggles in low light.
Performance
The Micromax In 2b holds a slight advantage here. Its Unisoc T610 chipset boasts a marginally faster CPU clock speed (1.8 GHz vs 1.6 GHz) and a slightly more advanced architecture. This translates to smoother app loading and slightly better responsiveness in everyday tasks. The Moto E13's T606 is still capable, but the In 2b has a noticeable edge.
Battery Life
Both devices offer a 5000mAh battery, suggesting all-day battery life under moderate usage. Charging speeds are identical at 10W, which is relatively slow by today's standards. Expect a full charge to take around 2-3 hours.
Buying Guide
The Micromax In 2b is ideal for users prioritizing a bit more processing power for basic multitasking and occasional gaming. The Motorola Moto E13 is a good choice for those seeking a reliable, clean Android experience and a brand known for its software updates, even if performance is slightly less robust.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone has better software updates?
Motorola generally provides more consistent and timely software updates compared to Micromax, making the Moto E13 a slightly safer bet for long-term software support.
❓ Is the Micromax In 2b worth considering if I'm a casual user?
Yes, the In 2b is a solid option for casual users. Its slightly better performance will be noticeable in everyday tasks, and it often comes at a competitive price.
