Looking for an affordable smartphone in India? The Micromax In 2b and In 1b are popular contenders. But which one offers the best value for your money? This comprehensive comparison dives deep into their specs, performance, and features to help you decide.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Micromax In 2b edges out the In 1b thanks to its slightly more powerful Unisoc T610 chipset, offering a smoother overall experience. While both are budget-friendly, the In 2b's improved performance makes it the better choice for most users, despite similar charging speeds.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, July 30. Released 2021, August 06 | 2020, November 03. Released 2020, November 26 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 164.3 x 75.7 x 8.6 mm (6.47 x 2.98 x 0.34 in) | 164.5 x 75.8 x 8.9 mm (6.48 x 2.98 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 190 g (6.70 oz) | 188 g (6.63 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~82.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~82.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 400 nits (typ) | IPS LCD, 400 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Unisoc T610 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6765G Helio G35 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MP2 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 10 (Go edition) |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM | 32GB 2GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens | 13 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2 | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2 | 8 MP, f/2.0 |
| Video | Unspecified | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | Unspecified | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 10W wired
Reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Blue, Black, Green | Blue, Purple, Green |
| Models | E7544 | E6523, E7533 |
| Price | About 90 EUR | About 80 EUR |
| SAR | 0.85 W/kg (head) 1.13 W/kg (body) | 0.57 W/kg (head) 0.90 W/kg (body) |
Micromax In 2b
- Slightly better performance (Unisoc T610)
- Potentially brighter display
- Good value for money
- Slow 10W charging
- Average camera performance
- Plastic build quality
Micromax In 1b
- Very affordable
- Decent battery life
- Reverse wired charging
- Lower performance (Helio G35)
- Average camera performance
- Slow 10W charging
Display Comparison
Both phones likely feature similar display technology (likely IPS LCD) and resolution (likely HD+). The In 2b *might* have a slightly brighter display, but this is not definitively confirmed. Expect similar viewing angles and color accuracy for both.
Camera Comparison
Camera specs are likely similar, with both phones featuring a multi-camera setup (likely a primary sensor, macro, and depth sensor). Image quality will depend heavily on software processing. Expect decent results in good lighting conditions, but low-light performance will be average on both.
Performance
The Unisoc T610 in the In 2b holds a performance advantage over the Helio G35 in the In 1b. The Cortex-A75 cores in the T610 provide a boost for demanding tasks, resulting in snappier app loading and smoother multitasking. The In 1b will handle basic tasks adequately, but may struggle with heavier applications.
Battery Life
Both phones likely have a battery capacity around 5000mAh, offering all-day battery life with moderate usage. The 10W charging speed is slow on both, so expect long charging times.
Buying Guide
The Micromax In 2b is ideal for users who prioritize a bit more performance for everyday tasks and light gaming. The Micromax In 1b is a good option for those on a very tight budget who primarily need a phone for basic communication and media consumption.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone is better for gaming?
The Micromax In 2b is better suited for gaming due to its more powerful chipset. However, don't expect high-end gaming performance from either phone.
❓ Does the In 1b support reverse charging?
Yes, the Micromax In 1b supports reverse wired charging, allowing you to charge other devices using its battery.
❓ What is the RAM and storage configuration for each phone?
Both phones typically come in configurations like 2GB/32GB, 3GB/64GB, and 4GB/64GB. Check the specific model you are purchasing.
