The budget smartphone market is fiercely competitive, offering incredible value for money. Today, we're pitting two contenders against each other: the Micromax In 1 and the Realme Narzo N53. Both promise a lot, but which one delivers the best overall experience?
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Realme Narzo N53 takes the crown thanks to its significantly faster charging, a generally smoother user experience due to the optimized software, and a slightly more powerful chipset. While the Micromax In 1 offers a decent experience, the Narzo N53 provides a more compelling package for the price.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, March 19. Released 2021, March 26 | 2023, May 18 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2023, May 22 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 165.2 x 77 x 9 mm (6.50 x 3.03 x 0.35 in) | 167.3 x 76.7 x 7.5 mm (6.59 x 3.02 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 195 g (6.88 oz) | 182 g (6.42 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~390 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~84.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.74 inches, 109.7 cm2 (~85.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 440 nits (peak) | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 450 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6769V/CU Helio G80 (12 nm) | Unisoc Tiger T612 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Mali-G57 |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 13, Realme UI T |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 720p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired
2.5W reverse wired | 33W wired, 50% in 31 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Blue, Purple | Black, Gold |
| Models | E6746 | RMX3761 |
| Price | About 120 EUR | About 100 EUR |
| SAR | 0.96 W/kg (head) | - |
Micromax In 1
- Larger Display (potentially)
- Familiar Android Experience
- Decent Battery Life
- Slower Charging
- Less Powerful Processor
- Potentially Less Optimized Software
Realme Narzo N53
- Faster 33W Charging
- Slightly More Powerful Processor
- Optimized Software
- Modern Design
- Smaller Display (potentially)
- May have Realme UI bloatware
Display Comparison
Both phones feature large displays, likely around 6.5 inches, with HD+ resolutions. While the Micromax In 1 might have a slightly larger display, the Realme Narzo N53 could offer better color accuracy and brightness due to Realme's generally better display tuning. Expect similar viewing experiences overall, suitable for everyday use and media consumption.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is likely comparable. Both phones will likely feature a primary 13MP or 50MP camera, along with depth sensors. Image quality will depend heavily on software processing. Realme often has a slight advantage in image processing, resulting in more vibrant and detailed photos. Low-light performance will be average on both.
Performance
The Realme Narzo N53's Unisoc Tiger T612 holds a slight edge over the Micromax In 1's Helio G80. While both are octa-core processors, the T612 often demonstrates better efficiency and smoother multitasking. Expect slightly faster app loading times and a more fluid user experience on the Narzo N53. Gaming performance will be adequate on both, but the Narzo N53 might handle more demanding titles slightly better.
Battery Life
This is where the Realme Narzo N53 truly shines. Its 33W fast charging is a game-changer compared to the Micromax In 1's 18W charging. The Narzo N53 will charge significantly faster, reducing downtime. Battery capacity is likely similar (around 5000mAh), so expect comparable battery life between charges, but the Realme's faster charging makes it the clear winner.
Buying Guide
The Micromax In 1 is a good option for users prioritizing a larger display and a familiar Android experience, especially if charging speed isn't a major concern. The Realme Narzo N53 is ideal for those who value fast charging, a responsive user interface, and a slightly more modern design.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone has better battery life?
While both have similar battery capacities, the Realme Narzo N53's faster charging means it spends less time plugged in, making it feel like it has better overall battery management.
❓ Is the Micromax In 1 worth considering?
The Micromax In 1 is a decent option if you prioritize a larger display and a simple Android experience, but the Realme Narzo N53 offers a more compelling package overall, especially considering its faster charging and slightly better performance.
