The budget smartphone market is fiercely competitive, offering incredible value for money. Today, we're pitting two contenders against each other: the Micromax In 1 and the Motorola Moto G32. Both promise a lot, but which one delivers the best overall experience?
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Motorola Moto G32 edges out the Micromax In 1 thanks to its more efficient chipset, faster charging, and generally smoother software experience. While the In 1 offers a competitive price, the G32's performance and features make it the slightly better choice for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, March 19. Released 2021, March 26 | 2022, July 28 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2022, August 16 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 165.2 x 77 x 9 mm (6.50 x 3.03 x 0.35 in) | 161.8 x 73.8 x 8.5 mm (6.37 x 2.91 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 195 g (6.88 oz) | 184 g (6.49 oz) |
| | - | Water-repellent design |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~84.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~85.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 440 nits (peak) | IPS LCD, 90Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6769V/CU Helio G80 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Adreno 610 |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8 (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP, f/2.4, (macro/depth) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired
2.5W reverse wired | 30W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Blue, Purple | Mineral Grey, Satin Silver, Rose Gold |
| Models | E6746 | XT2235-2, XT2235-3 |
| Price | About 120 EUR | ₹ 8,990 |
| SAR | 0.96 W/kg (head) | - |
Micromax In 1
- Large Display
- Budget-Friendly Price
- Reverse Charging
- Less Powerful Processor
- Slower Charging
- Potentially Less Refined Software
Motorola Moto G32
- Faster Processor (Snapdragon 680)
- 120Hz Display
- 30W Fast Charging
- Clean Android Experience
- Slightly Higher Price
- Design may be less distinctive
Display Comparison
Both phones feature a 6.5-inch display, but the Moto G32 boasts a 120Hz refresh rate, offering a noticeably smoother scrolling and gaming experience compared to the In 1's standard refresh rate. The Moto G32 also likely has better color accuracy and brightness.
Camera Comparison
While both phones offer multiple rear cameras, the Moto G32's camera system is generally considered to be superior, particularly in low-light conditions. Motorola often includes better image processing algorithms. The In 1's camera is adequate, but not exceptional.
Performance
The Snapdragon 680 in the Moto G32 is significantly more efficient and powerful than the Helio G80 in the Micromax In 1. Expect faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance on the Moto G32. The 6nm process of the Snapdragon also contributes to better power efficiency.
Battery Life
The Moto G32's 30W fast charging is a significant advantage over the In 1's 18W charging. Both phones likely have similar battery capacities (around 5000mAh), but the faster charging on the Moto G32 means quicker top-ups.
Buying Guide
The Micromax In 1 is a good option for users prioritizing a large display and a budget-friendly price tag. The Motorola Moto G32 is ideal for those seeking a balance of performance, battery life, and a clean Android experience, even if it means spending a bit more.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone has better gaming performance?
The Motorola Moto G32, thanks to its Snapdragon 680 chipset, offers significantly better gaming performance than the Micromax In 1.
❓ Is the Micromax In 1 worth considering if I'm on a very tight budget?
Yes, the Micromax In 1 remains a viable option if budget is your absolute top priority. However, be prepared for some compromises in performance and features.
