The Micromax Canvas Blaze 4G+ Q414 and the Panasonic P55 Novo represent the lower end of the smartphone market, targeting first-time buyers or those seeking a reliable secondary device. While both aim for affordability, they take different approaches to core components, particularly in their CPU configurations. This comparison dissects these differences to determine which device delivers the best experience for the price.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing basic functionality and a potentially smoother multitasking experience, the Panasonic P55 Novo emerges as the better choice. Its octa-core CPU, while not specifying architecture, offers a theoretical performance advantage over the Micromax’s quad-core Mediatek MT6735M, making it more capable for everyday tasks.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 | GSM 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 2100 |
| 4G bands | 3, 5, 40 | 3, 5, 40 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/11.5 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2015, November. Released 2015, November | 2016, November. Released 2016, November |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 131 x 65.5 x 8.2 mm (5.16 x 2.58 x 0.32 in) | 147.9 x 73.8 x 8.2 mm (5.82 x 2.91 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Dual SIM (Mini-SIM/ Micro-SIM) | Dual SIM |
| Weight | 119 g (4.20 oz) | 155 g (5.47 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 480 x 854 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~218 ppi density) | 720 x 1280 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~267 ppi density) |
| Size | 4.5 inches, 55.8 cm2 (~65.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 5.5 inches, 83.4 cm2 (~76.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Quad-core 1.0 GHz Cortex-A53 | Octa-core 1.3 GHz |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6735M (28 nm) | - |
| GPU | Mali-T720MP2 | - |
| OS | Android 5.1 (Lollipop) | Android 6.0 (Marshmallow) |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDHC | microSDHC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 8GB 1GB RAM | 16GB 3GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | Tripple-LED flash |
| Single | 8 MP, AF | 13 MP, AF |
| Video | 720p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | LED flash |
| Single | 2 MP | 5 MP |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.0, A2DP | 4.0, A2DP |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio, RDS |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | microUSB 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, hotspot | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity | Accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Stand-by | Up to 200 h | - |
| Talk time | Up to 5 h | - |
| Type | Li-Ion 1750 mAh, removable | Li-Ion 2500 mAh, removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black | Champagne Gold, Smoke Grey/Midnight Blue |
| Models | - | P55 Novo, P55 Novo 4G |
| Price | - | About 100 EUR |
Micromax Canvas Blaze 4G+ Q414
- Potentially better power efficiency due to the 28nm process.
- Likely more affordable price point.
- Simpler software experience (potentially).
- Quad-core processor limits multitasking capabilities.
- Lower overall performance compared to the Panasonic.
- Limited future-proofing.
Panasonic P55 Novo
- Octa-core processor offers smoother multitasking.
- Better performance for everyday tasks and light gaming.
- Potentially more responsive user interface.
- May experience slightly shorter battery life.
- Potentially higher price point.
- Software bloatware is a possibility.
Display Comparison
Neither device provides display specifications, so a direct comparison is difficult. However, given their price points, it's safe to assume both utilize LCD panels with resolutions likely around 480x854 or similar. The absence of details suggests neither prioritizes display quality, focusing instead on cost reduction. Bezels are likely to be substantial on both models, maximizing screen real estate within a compact form factor.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, assessing image quality is challenging. Both devices likely feature basic camera setups geared towards casual photography. The absence of information suggests neither phone prioritizes camera performance. It's reasonable to assume both will struggle in low-light conditions and lack advanced features like optical image stabilization (OIS). Any mention of megapixel count would be misleading without knowing sensor size and lens quality.
Performance
The core difference lies in the CPU. The Micromax Canvas Blaze 4G+ Q414 is powered by a Mediatek MT6735M, a quad-core processor based on the Cortex-A53 architecture. This chipset, fabricated on a 28nm process, is known for its efficiency but limited raw power. Conversely, the Panasonic P55 Novo boasts an octa-core CPU clocked at 1.3 GHz. While the specific architecture of these cores isn't specified, an eight-core configuration generally provides superior multitasking capabilities and responsiveness compared to a quad-core setup, even if individual core performance is similar. The 28nm process of the MT6735M suggests it may run cooler, but the P55 Novo’s higher core count will likely be more beneficial for demanding applications.
Battery Life
Battery capacity and charging wattage are not provided for either device. Given their budget nature, both likely feature modest battery sizes (around 2000-2500 mAh). Without fast charging support, expect 0-100% charge times to be in the 3-4 hour range. The Mediatek MT6735M’s 28nm process *could* translate to slightly better battery life in the Micromax, but the P55 Novo’s more efficient use of processing power during idle tasks might offset this advantage.
Buying Guide
Buy the Micromax Canvas Blaze 4G+ Q414 if you need a phone primarily for calls, texts, and very light app usage, and are heavily constrained by budget. Its Mediatek chipset is known for reasonable power efficiency. Buy the Panasonic P55 Novo if you prefer a device capable of handling a few more apps simultaneously, or if you anticipate occasional light gaming or social media browsing; the octa-core processor provides a noticeable performance boost for these scenarios.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Panasonic P55 Novo struggle with popular apps like WhatsApp and Facebook?
While the P55 Novo’s octa-core processor isn’t high-end, it should handle apps like WhatsApp and Facebook without significant issues. The increased core count compared to the Micromax’s quad-core chip will provide a smoother experience when switching between these apps and other background processes.
❓ Is the Mediatek MT6735M in the Micromax Canvas Blaze 4G+ capable of running any games?
The Mediatek MT6735M can run some basic Android games, but don't expect a high-performance gaming experience. Simple 2D games and older 3D titles may be playable at low settings, but demanding games will likely suffer from lag and low frame rates.
❓ Which phone is likely to receive more software updates?
Neither Micromax nor Panasonic have a strong track record for consistent software updates on their budget devices. It's unlikely either phone will receive major Android version updates, and security patches may be infrequent. Expect a relatively static software experience.
