Micromax, once a dominant force in the Indian budget smartphone market, continues to offer affordable options. The Canvas 4 Plus A315 and Canvas Sliver 5 Q450 represent different approaches to this segment. Let's dive into a detailed comparison to help you decide which one is right for you.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Canvas 4 Plus A315 boasts an octa-core processor, potentially offering a slight edge in multi-tasking. However, the Canvas Sliver 5 Q450's Snapdragon 410 and generally better software support make it the more practical and reliable choice for most users. It's a close call, but the Sliver 5 edges out the 4 Plus.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | - | LTE 800 / 1800 / 2600 TD-LTE 2300 |
| Speed | HSPA | HSPA 21.1/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2014, September. Released 2014, September | 2015, June. Released 2015, July |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 7 mm thickness | 5.1 mm thickness |
| SIM | Dual SIM | Nano-SIM |
| Weight | - | 97 g (3.42 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1280 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~294 ppi density) | 720 x 1280 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~306 ppi density) |
| Size | 5.0 inches, 68.9 cm2 | 4.8 inches, 63.5 cm2 |
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core 1.7 GHz Cortex-A7 | Quad-core 1.2 GHz Cortex-A53 |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6592 (28 nm) | Qualcomm MSM8916 Snapdragon 410 (28 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-450MP4 | Adreno 306 |
| OS | Android 4.4.2 (KitKat) | Android 5.0.2 (Lollipop) |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDHC | No |
| Internal | 16GB 1GB RAM | 16GB 2GB RAM |
| | - | eMMC 4.5 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama | LED flash |
| Single | 13 MP, AF | 8 MP, AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 5 MP | 5 MP |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.0, A2DP | 4.0, A2DP |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | microUSB 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, hotspot | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, hotspot |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity | Accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Stand-by | Up to 205 h (3G) | Up to 345 h (3G) |
| Talk time | Up to 7 h (3G) | Up to 8 h (3G) |
| Type | Li-Ion 2000 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 2000 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | White/Gold, Black | White |
| Models | - | Q450 |
| Price | - | About 250 EUR |
| SAR | 0.68 W/kg (head) 0.61 W/kg (body) | - |
| SAR EU | - | 0.31 W/kg (head) 1.07 W/kg (body) |
Micromax Canvas 4 Plus A315
- Octa-core processor (potential for better multi-tasking)
- Potentially larger battery
- Generally more affordable
- Mediatek chipset (potential for thermal throttling and less optimized software)
- Older software support
- Potentially lower build quality
Micromax Canvas Sliver 5 Q450
- Qualcomm Snapdragon chipset (better software optimization and efficiency)
- More reliable performance
- Potentially better camera image processing
- More modern design
- Quad-core processor (slightly less raw processing power)
- Potentially smaller battery
- May be slightly more expensive
Display Comparison
Both phones likely feature similar 5-6 inch displays with HD (720p) resolution. Expect adequate viewing angles and color reproduction for everyday use. The Sliver 5 might have a slightly more refined display panel due to potentially newer technology, but the difference will be minimal.
Camera Comparison
Camera quality on both phones is likely to be average, with 8-13MP rear cameras and 5MP front cameras. The Sliver 5's Snapdragon chipset might offer slightly better image processing capabilities, resulting in marginally better photos in certain lighting conditions. Low-light performance will likely be similar on both.
Performance
The Canvas 4 Plus A315's octa-core Mediatek MT6592 offers a theoretical advantage in multi-core performance. However, Mediatek chipsets often suffer from less efficient thermal management and less optimized software. The Canvas Sliver 5 Q450's Snapdragon 410, while quad-core, benefits from Qualcomm's better software optimization and generally smoother performance in real-world usage. Expect the Sliver 5 to handle everyday tasks and light gaming more efficiently.
Battery Life
The Canvas 4 Plus A315 likely has a slightly larger battery (around 2600-3000mAh), but the Snapdragon 410 in the Sliver 5 is more power-efficient. Expect similar battery life – a full day of moderate usage – on both devices.
Buying Guide
The Micromax Canvas 4 Plus A315 is suitable for users prioritizing raw processing power on a tight budget and who are comfortable with potentially older software. The Micromax Canvas Sliver 5 Q450 is ideal for those seeking a more stable and user-friendly experience with decent performance and a more modern design.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone is better for gaming?
The Canvas Sliver 5 Q450 is generally better for gaming due to its more efficient chipset and optimized software. While the 4 Plus has a more powerful processor, it may suffer from overheating and performance throttling.
❓ How long will the software support be for each phone?
Software support for both Micromax phones is limited. However, the Canvas Sliver 5 Q450, being slightly newer, might receive updates for a marginally longer period.
