The Micromax Canvas 1 and Sony Xperia XA Ultra represent different approaches to the affordable smartphone market. The Canvas 1 aimed for extreme budget-friendliness, while the XA Ultra attempted to deliver a more premium experience without breaking the bank. This comparison dissects their key differences, focusing on performance, display, and battery to help you decide which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing smooth multitasking and a more responsive experience, the Sony Xperia XA Ultra is the clear winner. Its octa-core Helio P10 chipset provides a substantial performance boost over the Canvas 1's quad-core MT6737. However, the Canvas 1 remains a viable option for basic users on a very tight budget.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 (dual-SIM model only) |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 - F3211, F3215, F3212, F3216 |
| 4G bands | 3, 5, 40 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20 - F3211, F3212 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 - F3215, F3216 |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2017, July. Released 2017, August | 2016, May. Released 2016, July |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 143 x 71 x 8.3 mm (5.63 x 2.80 x 0.33 in) | 164 x 79 x 8.4 mm (6.46 x 3.11 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Dual SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 150 g (5.29 oz) | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Scratch-resistant glass |
| Resolution | 720 x 1280 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~294 ppi density) | 1080 x 1920 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~367 ppi density) |
| Size | 5.0 inches, 68.9 cm2 (~67.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.0 inches, 99.2 cm2 (~76.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Quad-core 1.3 GHz Cortex-A53 | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.0 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6737 (28 nm) | Mediatek MT6755 Helio P10 (28 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-T720 | Mali-T860MP2 |
| OS | Android 7.0 (Nougat) | Android 6.0.1 (Marshmallow), upgradable to 7.0 (Nougat) |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 16GB 2GB RAM | 16GB 3GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.0 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.2, 1/3.2", 1.4µm, AF | 21.5 MP, f/2.2, 1/2.4", 1/2.4", PDAF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, HDR |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | LED flash |
| Single | 5 MP | 16 MP, f/2.0, 23mm (wide), 1/2.6", OIS |
| Video | - | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.0, A2DP | 4.1, A2DP, LE, aptX |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio, RDS |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | microUSB 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity | Accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Music play | Up to 15 h | Up to 65 h |
| Stand-by | - | Up to 558 h (2G) / Up to 708 h (3G) |
| Talk time | Up to 7 h (3G) | Up to 13 h (2G) / Up to 12 h (3G) |
| Type | Li-Ion 2500 mAh, removable | Li-Ion 2700 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Matte Black, Chrome Black | White, Graphite Black, Lime Gold |
| Models | C1 | F3212, F3216, F3211, F3213, F3215 |
| Price | About 7000 INR | About 250 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.27 W/kg (head) 0.37 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.72 W/kg (head) 0.43 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Audio quality | - |
Noise -92.9dB / Crosstalk -92.5dB |
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 55h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1071 (nominal), 2.906 (sunlight) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
Voice 88dB / Noise 79dB / Ring 82dB
|
| Performance | - |
Basemark OS II 2.0: 987Basemark X: 6754 |
Micromax Canvas 1
- Extremely affordable price point
- Decent battery endurance (55h)
- Functional for basic smartphone tasks
- Weak processor performance (MT6737)
- Limited multitasking capabilities
- Camera likely lacks advanced features
Sony Xperia XA Ultra
- Significantly faster processor (Helio P10)
- Improved multitasking and gaming performance
- Likely better camera quality due to Sony's expertise
- Higher price compared to the Canvas 1
- Battery life may be impacted by the more powerful processor
- Details on battery capacity are missing
Display Comparison
Both the Micromax Canvas 1 and Sony Xperia XA Ultra share a similar contrast ratio of 1071 (nominal) and 2.906 (sunlight). This suggests comparable visibility in direct sunlight. However, details regarding panel technology (IPS, TFT) and resolution are missing for the Canvas 1. The XA Ultra, being a slightly higher-tier device, likely benefits from better color accuracy and viewing angles, though specific measurements are unavailable. The shared contrast ratio indicates a similar level of black depth and color pop.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are listed as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but specific details regarding sensor size, aperture, or image processing are absent. Given Sony's camera expertise, the XA Ultra likely features a more sophisticated camera system with better image quality, especially in low-light conditions. The absence of details on the Canvas 1 suggests a more basic camera setup focused on everyday snapshots. Without further information, it's difficult to make a definitive comparison beyond brand reputation.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Micromax Canvas 1 utilizes the Mediatek MT6737, a quad-core processor based on the Cortex-A53 architecture clocked at 1.3 GHz. The Sony Xperia XA Ultra, however, boasts the Mediatek MT6755 Helio P10, an octa-core processor featuring a combination of 2.0 GHz and 1.0 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. This configuration provides a significant performance advantage for the XA Ultra, particularly in multitasking and demanding applications. The Helio P10's more powerful GPU also translates to a better gaming experience. While both are built on a 28nm process, the architectural advantage of the P10 is substantial.
Battery Life
Interestingly, both the Micromax Canvas 1 and Sony Xperia XA Ultra share an endurance rating of 55 hours. This suggests similar battery life despite the XA Ultra's more powerful processor. This could be due to optimizations in the XA Ultra's software or a larger battery capacity (which is not specified for either device). The shared endurance rating indicates that both phones can comfortably last a full day of moderate use, but the XA Ultra's faster processor might consume more power during intensive tasks.
Buying Guide
Buy the Micromax Canvas 1 if you need a functional smartphone for essential tasks like calls, texts, and light social media, and your budget is extremely limited. Buy the Sony Xperia XA Ultra if you prioritize smoother performance for multitasking, occasional gaming, and a more refined user experience, and are willing to spend a bit more.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Sony Xperia XA Ultra struggle with demanding games like PUBG?
While the Helio P10 is capable, PUBG may require lower graphics settings for a consistently smooth experience. The XA Ultra will perform significantly better than the Canvas 1, but it's not a dedicated gaming phone. Expect playable frame rates at medium settings.
❓ Is the battery life of the Xperia XA Ultra noticeably shorter than the Canvas 1 when using power-intensive apps?
Despite both having a 55-hour endurance rating, the XA Ultra's more powerful processor will drain the battery faster when running demanding apps like games or video editing software. However, for typical usage (calls, texts, browsing), the difference should be minimal.
❓ Can the Micromax Canvas 1 handle basic social media apps like Facebook and WhatsApp without significant lag?
Yes, the Canvas 1 should be able to handle basic social media apps like Facebook and WhatsApp without major issues. However, expect slower loading times and occasional lag when switching between apps or scrolling through content-heavy feeds.
❓ Does the Sony Xperia XA Ultra support fast charging?
While the context data doesn't specify, Sony typically included fast charging capabilities in their mid-range devices. Researching the XA Ultra's original specifications would confirm the exact charging wattage and 0-100% time.
