Huawei Mate 50 Pro vs. Meizu V8 Pro: A Clash of Classes
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing performance, camera quality, and future-proofing, the Huawei Mate 50 Pro is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset and superior battery life justify the higher price. However, the Meizu V8 Pro remains a viable option for those on a strict budget who prioritize basic functionality.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Meizu V8 Pro | Huawei Mate 50 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 - China | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 - China | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/11.5 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat6 300/50 Mbps | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE |
| CDMA 800 & TD-SCDMA - China | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2018, September. Released 2018, September | 2022, September 06 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2022, September 28 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 147.5 x 72.7 x 8.1 mm (5.81 x 2.86 x 0.32 in) | 162.1 x 75.5 x 8.5 mm (6.38 x 2.97 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 159 g (5.61 oz) | 205 g / 209 g (7.23 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 6m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Huawei Kunlun Glass |
| Resolution | 720 x 1440 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~282 ppi density) | 1212 x 2616 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~428 ppi density) |
| Size | 5.7 inches, 83.8 cm2 (~78.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.74 inches, 111.8 cm2 (~91.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 | Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6762 Helio P22 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 4G (4 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 8.0 (Oreo), Flyme UI | EMUI 13 (International), HarmonyOS 3.0 (China) |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | Nano Memory (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM |
| eMMC 5.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 12 MP, f/2.2, AF 5 MP, f/2.2 | - |
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, panorama | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | - | 13 MP, f/2.4, 18mm (ultrawide) TOF 3D, (depth/biometrics sensor) |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.4-f/4.0, 24mm (wide), PDAF, OIS 64 MP, f/3.5, 90mm (periscope telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 3.5x optical zoom 13 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), PDAF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/480fps, 720p@960fps, 720p@3840fps, HDR, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 5 MP, f/1.9 | 13 MP, f/2.4, 18mm (ultrawide) TOF 3D, (depth/biometrics sensor) |
| Video | - | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 32-bit/384kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG, Display Port 1.2 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Face ID, fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, barometer, compass |
| - | BDS Satellite Message (sending only) | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | - | 66W wired 50W wireless 5W reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Ion 3100 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 4700 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Gold | Black, Silver, Purple, Orange |
| Models | - | DCO-AL00, DCO-LX9 |
| Price | About 150 EUR | About 900 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 104h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -24.8 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 979921 (v9) GeekBench: 3839 (v5.1) GFXBench: 68fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Meizu V8 Pro
- Powerful Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 processor
- Excellent battery life and fast charging
- High-brightness, high-contrast display
- Higher price point
- 4G connectivity only
Huawei Mate 50 Pro
- Very affordable price
- Functional for basic smartphone tasks
- Compact and lightweight (likely)
- Weak processor performance
- Inferior camera quality
- Slow charging (likely)
Display Comparison
The Huawei Mate 50 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 946 nits, ensuring excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While the Meizu V8 Pro’s display specifications are unavailable, it’s reasonable to assume a lower peak brightness. The Mate 50 Pro’s 'Infinite' contrast ratio suggests a high-quality OLED panel, offering deep blacks and vibrant colors, a feature likely absent in the V8 Pro’s more cost-constrained display. The lack of information on the V8 Pro’s panel type suggests it likely utilizes an LCD, which typically has lower contrast and viewing angles.
Camera Comparison
Both devices feature photo and video capabilities, but the Huawei Mate 50 Pro is expected to offer a far superior imaging experience. While specific sensor details are missing, Huawei’s flagship phones are renowned for their camera technology. The Mate 50 Pro likely incorporates larger sensors, optical image stabilization (OIS), and advanced image processing algorithms. The Meizu V8 Pro, given its budget positioning, likely utilizes simpler camera modules with smaller sensors and limited features. The absence of details on the V8 Pro’s camera suggests it won’t compete with the Mate 50 Pro’s expected image quality.
Performance
The performance gap between these devices is substantial. The Huawei Mate 50 Pro’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 4G (4nm) is a flagship-tier chipset featuring an octa-core configuration with a Cortex-X2 prime core clocked at 3.19 GHz. This architecture delivers significantly faster processing speeds and improved efficiency compared to the Meizu V8 Pro’s MediaTek MT6762 Helio P22 (12nm) and its Cortex-A53 cores clocked at 2.0 GHz. The 4nm fabrication process of the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 further enhances efficiency, reducing heat and improving sustained performance, crucial for gaming and multitasking. The V8 Pro’s Helio P22 is designed for basic smartphone tasks and will struggle with demanding applications.
Battery Life
The Huawei Mate 50 Pro excels in battery life, achieving an impressive endurance rating of 104 hours and an active use score of 10:36h. This is complemented by incredibly fast charging capabilities: 66W wired, 50W wireless, and even 5W reverse wireless. The Meizu V8 Pro’s battery capacity is unknown, but given its lower price point, it’s likely smaller. The lack of fast charging specifications suggests significantly slower charging times compared to the Mate 50 Pro. The Mate 50 Pro’s charging versatility provides convenience and minimizes downtime.
Buying Guide
Buy the Meizu V8 Pro if you need a functional smartphone for essential tasks like calling, texting, and light social media use, and your budget is under $200. Buy the Huawei Mate 50 Pro if you demand a premium experience with a powerful processor for gaming and demanding applications, a versatile camera system, and fast charging capabilities, and are willing to invest in a higher-priced device.