Released in late 2017, the Meizu Pro 7 Plus and OnePlus 5T represented distinct approaches to the flagship smartphone experience. The Pro 7 Plus aimed for innovation with its deca-core processor and unique dual-display design (not detailed in provided data), while the OnePlus 5T focused on delivering a refined, high-performance experience at a competitive price. This comparison revisits these devices, focusing on the core specifications to determine which holds up better today.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user seeking a balanced experience, the OnePlus 5T is the stronger choice. Its Snapdragon 835 chipset delivers consistently smoother performance, and its 82-hour endurance rating provides a noticeable advantage in battery life over the Meizu Pro 7 Plus’s 70-hour rating. While the Pro 7 Plus attempted to push boundaries, the 5T’s execution is more polished.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 7, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (3CA) Cat12 600/150 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / EVDO / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE |
| | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO & TD-SCDMA | CDMA 800 & TD-SCDMA |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2017, July. Released 2017, August | 2017, November 16. Released 2017, November 21 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, aluminum back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 157.3 x 77.2 x 7.3 mm (6.19 x 3.04 x 0.29 in) | 156.1 x 75 x 7.3 mm (6.15 x 2.95 x 0.29 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 170 g (6.00 oz) | 162 g (5.71 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1440 x 2560 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~518 ppi density) | 1080 x 2160 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) |
| Size | 5.7 inches, 88.5 cm2 (~72.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.01 inches, 93.7 cm2 (~80.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED | Optic AMOLED |
| | Secondary 2" AMOLED display, 240 x 536 pixels | - |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Deca-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A73, 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A35, 4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (4x2.45 GHz Kryo & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6799 Helio X30 (10 nm) | Qualcomm MSM8998 Snapdragon 835 (10 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR 7XTP | Adreno 540 |
| OS | Android 7.0 (Nougat), Flyme 7.3 | Android 7.1.1 (Nougat), upgradable to Android 10, OxygenOS 10.0.0 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 16 MP, f/1.7, 27mm (wide), 1/2.8", 1.12µm, PDAF
20 MP, f/1.7, 27mm (wide), 1/2.8", 1.0µm, AF, PDAF |
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 12 MP, f/2.0, 1/2.9", 1.25µm, PDAF | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@30/120fps, Auto HDR |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.0, 20mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | - | 1080p (gyro-EIS) |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| | 32-bit/192kHz audio
| Dirac HD sound |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (front-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 24W wired, 45% in 30 min | 20W wired |
| Type | Li-Ion 3500 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 3300 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, gold, silver | Midnight Black, Lava Red, Sandstone White |
| Models | PRO 7 Plus | A5010 |
| Price | About 500 EUR | About 840 EUR |
| Tests |
|---|
| Audio quality |
Noise -92.1dB / Crosstalk -92.8dB |
Noise -94.0dB / Crosstalk -93.7dB |
| Battery life | Endurance rating 70h | Endurance rating 82h |
| Camera |
Photo / Video |
Photo / Video |
| Display |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal), 4.147 (sunlight) |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal), 4.789 (sunlight) |
| Loudspeaker |
Voice 87dB / Noise 72dB / Ring 90dB |
Voice 68dB / Noise 73dB / Ring 69dB |
| Performance |
GFXBench: 4.8fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
AnTuTu: 207072 (v7), 260352 (v8)
GeekBench: 6759 (v4.4), 1705 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 24fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Meizu Pro 7 Plus
- Potentially higher multi-core performance with the deca-core Helio X30.
- Faster wired charging speed (24W).
- Unique design (assuming dual-screen functionality is appealing).
- Lower battery endurance (70h vs 82h).
- Potentially less optimized software and thermal management.
- Less consistent performance compared to Snapdragon 835.
OnePlus 5T
- Superior battery life (82h endurance rating).
- More efficient and consistently performing Snapdragon 835 chipset.
- Better sunlight contrast ratio for improved outdoor visibility.
- Slower wired charging speed (20W).
- Less adventurous design compared to the Meizu Pro 7 Plus.
- May lack unique features found on the Pro 7 Plus (depending on dual-screen implementation).
Display Comparison
Both the Meizu Pro 7 Plus and OnePlus 5T boast 'Infinite' nominal contrast ratios, a marketing term common at the time. However, the OnePlus 5T demonstrates a superior contrast ratio in direct sunlight with a 4.789 measurement compared to the Pro 7 Plus’s 4.147. This suggests better outdoor visibility for the 5T. While both likely utilize AMOLED panels, the data doesn't specify panel technology or refresh rates. The higher sunlight contrast ratio on the OnePlus 5T provides a tangible benefit for users frequently exposed to bright environments.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer photo and video capabilities, but the provided data lacks specifics regarding sensor size, aperture, or image processing. Given the market positioning, the OnePlus 5T likely prioritized image quality and consistency, leveraging Qualcomm’s ISP. The Pro 7 Plus may have focused on unique features (again, assuming the dual-screen impacts camera functionality), but without detailed specs, a definitive camera comparison is impossible. We can assume both phones offered competitive camera performance for their time, but the OnePlus 5T likely had a more refined and reliable camera experience.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the Meizu Pro 7 Plus utilizes the Mediatek MT6799 Helio X30, a deca-core processor, while the OnePlus 5T employs the Qualcomm MSM8998 Snapdragon 835, an octa-core processor. While the Helio X30’s ten cores might appear advantageous, the Snapdragon 835’s Kryo cores are architecturally more efficient and benefit from Qualcomm’s optimized software integration. The 10nm process node is shared by both, but Qualcomm’s chipset generally exhibits better sustained performance and thermal management. This translates to a smoother experience during demanding tasks like gaming and video editing for the OnePlus 5T.
Battery Life
The OnePlus 5T holds a clear advantage in battery life, achieving an endurance rating of 82 hours compared to the Meizu Pro 7 Plus’s 70 hours. While the Pro 7 Plus supports faster wired charging at 24W (achieving 45% charge in 30 minutes), the 5T’s 20W charging is still respectable. The superior endurance rating of the 5T means users will likely spend less time tethered to a charger, making it the more practical choice for all-day use. The difference in endurance suggests more efficient power management by the Snapdragon 835 and optimized software on the OnePlus 5T.
Buying Guide
Buy the Meizu Pro 7 Plus if you prioritize a potentially higher peak performance in multi-threaded tasks, and are intrigued by a more experimental smartphone design (assuming the dual-screen functionality is appealing). Buy the OnePlus 5T if you value consistent performance, superior battery life, and a more streamlined user experience. The 5T is the safer bet for daily use and longevity.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Mediatek Helio X30 in the Meizu Pro 7 Plus suffer from significant thermal throttling under sustained load?
While the Helio X30 is a powerful processor, its deca-core architecture and less mature software optimization compared to Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 835 often resulted in more noticeable thermal throttling during prolonged gaming or demanding tasks. This means performance could decrease over time as the phone heated up.
❓ How does the battery life difference between the two phones translate to real-world usage?
The 12-hour difference in endurance rating suggests the OnePlus 5T could realistically last a full day of moderate to heavy use, while the Meizu Pro 7 Plus might require a top-up charge before the end of the day. This is particularly noticeable for users who frequently use power-intensive apps like GPS, streaming video, or playing games.
❓ Is the faster charging speed of the Meizu Pro 7 Plus enough to offset its lower overall battery endurance?
No, the faster charging speed doesn't fully compensate for the lower endurance. While 24W charging is quicker, the OnePlus 5T's longer battery life means you'll need to charge it less frequently in the first place. The convenience of less frequent charging outweighs the benefit of slightly faster charging times.
