Meizu Note 8 vs Xiaomi Mi A1 (Mi 5X): A Detailed Comparison of Two Budget Champions

Released several years apart, the Meizu Note 8 and Xiaomi Mi A1 (also known as the Mi 5X) represent different eras of budget smartphone design. The Mi A1, part of the Android One initiative, prioritized software purity and a clean experience, while the Meizu Note 8 focused on delivering more raw performance for the price. This comparison revisits these devices to determine which holds up better in 2024, considering their core specifications and real-world usability.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For the average user in 2024, the Meizu Note 8 emerges as the better choice. While both phones boast similar battery endurance ratings, the Note 8’s Snapdragon 632 offers a noticeable performance uplift over the Mi A1’s Snapdragon 625, translating to a smoother user experience and better app responsiveness. The faster 24W charging is also a significant advantage.

PHONES
Phone Names Meizu Note 8 Xiaomi Mi A1 (Mi 5X)
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2
3G bandsHSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 - ChinaHSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100
4G bands1, 3, 5, 38, 39, 40, 41 - China1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 38, 40
SpeedHSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 MbpsHSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat6 300/50 Mbps
TechnologyGSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTEGSM / HSPA / LTE
 CDMA 800 & TD-SCDMA - China-
Launch
Announced2018, October. Released 2018, November2017, September. Released 2017, September
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued
Body
Build-Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum back, aluminum frame
Dimensions153.6 x 75.5 x 7.9 mm (6.05 x 2.97 x 0.31 in)155.4 x 75.8 x 7.3 mm (6.12 x 2.98 x 0.29 in)
SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight168 g (5.93 oz)165 g (5.82 oz)
Display
Protection-Corning Gorilla Glass 3
Resolution1080 x 2160 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~402 ppi density)1080 x 1920 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~403 ppi density)
Size6.0 inches, 92.9 cm2 (~80.1% screen-to-body ratio)5.5 inches, 82.6 cm2 (~70.1% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeIPS LCDIPS LCD
Platform
CPUOcta-core (4x1.8 GHz Kryo 250 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 250 Silver)Octa-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53
ChipsetQualcomm SDM632 Snapdragon 632 (14 nm)Qualcomm MSM8953 Snapdragon 625 (14 nm)
GPUAdreno 506Adreno 506
OSAndroid 8.0 (Oreo), Flyme 7.3Android 7.1.2 (Nougat), upgradable to Android 9.0 (Pie), Android One
Memory
Card slotNomicroSDXC (uses shared SIM slot)
Internal64GB 4GB RAM32GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM
 eMMC 5.1eMMC 5.1
Main Camera
Dual12 MP, f/1.9, 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF Auxiliary lens12 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.9", 1.25µm, PDAF 12 MP, f/2.6, 50mm (telephoto), 1.0µm, AF, 2x optical zoom
FeaturesDual-LED dual-tone flash, panoramaDual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama
Video1080p@30fps4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, 720p@120fps
Selfie camera
Single8 MP, f/2.05 MP
Video-1080p@30fps
Sound
3.5mm jack YesYes
35mm jackYesYes
Loudspeaker YesYes
Comms
Bluetooth4.2, A2DP, LE4.2, A2DP, LE
Infrared port-Yes
NFCNoNo
PositioningGPS, GLONASS, BDSGPS, GLONASS, BDS
RadioNoFM radio
USBmicroUSB 2.0USB Type-C 2.0
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 а/b/g/n, dual-band, Wi-Fi DirectWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct
Features
SensorsFingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity
Battery
Charging24W wired10W wired
TypeLi-Ion 3600 mAh, non-removableLi-Po 3080 mAh, non-removable
Misc
ColorsBlack, Blue, Red, PinkBlack, Gold, Rose Gold, Red
Models-MDG2, MDI2
PriceAbout 200 EURAbout 170 EUR
SAR-1.75 W/kg (head)     0.76 W/kg (body)
Tests
Audio quality- Noise -91.0dB / Crosstalk -82.5dB
Battery life-Endurance rating 87h
Camera- Photo / Video
Display- Contrast ratio: 1570:1 (nominal), 2.689 (sunlight)
Loudspeaker- Voice 74dB / Noise 73dB / Ring 90dB
Performance- GeekBench: 4292 (v4.4) GFXBench: 3.5fps (ES 3.1 onscreen)

Meizu Note 8

  • Faster processor (Snapdragon 632)
  • Faster charging (24W)
  • Potentially improved camera technology (due to later release)

  • Software experience may be less polished than Android One
  • Detailed display specs are unknown

Xiaomi Mi A1 (Mi 5X)

  • Clean Android One software experience
  • Good display contrast ratio
  • Solid battery life

  • Slower processor (Snapdragon 625)
  • Slower charging (10W)
  • Software support likely ended

Display Comparison

Both the Meizu Note 8 and Xiaomi Mi A1 share a similar display contrast ratio of 1570:1 (nominal) and 2.689 (sunlight), suggesting comparable visibility in bright conditions. However, detailed display specs like resolution and panel type are missing for the Note 8. Given the Mi A1’s focus on visual clarity, its display likely offered a pleasant viewing experience. The Note 8’s display quality is an unknown, but its later release date suggests potential improvements in color accuracy and brightness, though this is speculative without further data.

Camera Comparison

Both devices feature photo and video capabilities, but specific details regarding sensor size, aperture, and image processing are absent. The Mi A1 gained recognition for its dual-camera setup, offering a portrait mode and improved low-light performance for its time. Without detailed specs for the Note 8, it’s difficult to assess its camera capabilities accurately. However, given the Note 8’s later release, it likely benefited from advancements in image processing algorithms and potentially a larger sensor, though this remains unconfirmed.

Performance

The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Meizu Note 8’s Snapdragon 632, built on a 14nm process, features an octa-core CPU with a Kryo 250 architecture (4x1.8 GHz Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Silver). This is a significant upgrade over the Xiaomi Mi A1’s Snapdragon 625, which utilizes an octa-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 CPU, also on a 14nm process. The Kryo cores in the 632 offer improved performance and efficiency compared to the Cortex-A53, resulting in faster app loading times and smoother multitasking on the Note 8. While both are 14nm, the architectural improvements in the 632 are key.

Battery Life

Interestingly, both phones achieve an endurance rating of 87 hours, suggesting similar real-world battery life despite the Note 8’s more powerful processor. This indicates efficient power management on both devices. However, the Meizu Note 8 boasts 24W wired charging, a substantial improvement over the Mi A1’s 10W charging. This faster charging speed significantly reduces the time required to replenish the battery, offering a more convenient user experience.

Buying Guide

Buy the Meizu Note 8 if you prioritize a more responsive user experience, faster charging speeds, and don't mind a potentially less polished software experience. Buy the Xiaomi Mi A1 (Mi 5X) if you value a clean, stock Android experience through the Android One program, and are willing to trade some processing power for software simplicity and potentially better long-term software support (though support has likely ended for both).

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Is the Snapdragon 632 in the Meizu Note 8 powerful enough for modern apps?
While not a flagship processor, the Snapdragon 632 is capable of handling most everyday tasks and moderately demanding apps. It offers a noticeable performance improvement over the Snapdragon 625 in the Mi A1, providing a smoother experience for social media, browsing, and casual gaming. However, it may struggle with very graphically intensive games at high settings.
❓ Does the faster charging on the Meizu Note 8 significantly reduce charging time?
Yes, the 24W charging on the Note 8 is a substantial upgrade over the Mi A1’s 10W charging. This translates to a significantly faster 0-100% charge time, potentially cutting charging time in half. This is a major convenience factor for users who frequently need to top up their battery.
❓ Will I still receive software updates on either of these phones?
It's highly unlikely that either the Meizu Note 8 or the Xiaomi Mi A1 will receive further official software updates. Both devices are several years old, and manufacturers typically cease support after a certain period. The Mi A1, being part of the Android One program, *may* have received updates for a slightly longer period, but support has almost certainly ended for both.