The Meizu Note 22 Pro and Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range to upper-mid-range smartphone market. The Poco F5 Pro, leveraging the older but still potent Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, aims for raw performance. Conversely, the Meizu Note 22 Pro opts for the newer, more efficient Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, prioritizing a balance of power and longevity. This comparison dissects their strengths and weaknesses to determine which device delivers the best overall experience.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro emerges as the stronger choice. Its Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset provides a significant performance advantage, particularly in demanding tasks like gaming, and its 1059 nits peak brightness offers a superior viewing experience. While the Meizu Note 22 Pro offers respectable efficiency, the Poco F5 Pro’s overall package is more compelling.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 20, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, May 20 | 2023, May 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, May 20 | Available. Released 2023, May |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 163.8 x 76.2 x 8.4 mm (6.45 x 3.00 x 0.33 in) | 162.8 x 75.4 x 8.6 mm (6.41 x 2.97 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 197.5 g (6.98 oz) | 204 g (7.20 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1224 x 2720 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~440 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~526 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~88.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, 700 nits (typ), 1600 nits (peak), 4500 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 1000 nits (HBM), 1400 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.5 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.4 GHz Cortex-A720 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A520) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7635 Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 810 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Flyme AIOS 2 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 15mm (ultrawide)
2 MP, f/2.4 | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | Yes, gyro-EIS | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.1 | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1C+B2a), GALILEO, QZSS, GLONASS | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, QC4+, PD3.0, PPS, 50% in 22 min | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3+, 50% in 15 min
30W wireless, 50% in 32 min |
| Type | 6200 mAh | Li-Po 5160 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Lake Glide, Cloud White, Star Ash | Black, White |
| Models | - | 23013PC75G |
| Price | About 300 EUR | $ 449.99 / € 241.85 |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.08 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 1.00 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 99h |
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.2 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 1057977 (v9)
GeekBench: 4001 (v5.1), 4009 (v6)
GFXBench: 50fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Meizu Note 22 Pro
- Faster 80W wired charging
- Potentially better thermal management due to efficient chipset
- Likely more affordable price point
- Less powerful chipset compared to the Poco F5 Pro
- Missing display specifications (brightness, refresh rate)
- Likely less capable camera system
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
- Significantly more powerful Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
- Brighter display with 1059 nits peak brightness
- Wireless charging support
- Slightly slower wired charging (67W)
- Potential for thermal throttling under sustained load
- May be more expensive than the Meizu Note 22 Pro
Display Comparison
The Poco F5 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1059 nits, compared to an unspecified brightness for the Meizu Note 22 Pro. This translates to better visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. While both likely utilize AMOLED panels, the Poco’s higher peak brightness and infinite contrast ratio suggest a more immersive viewing experience. The absence of refresh rate information for the Meizu Note 22 Pro is a notable omission, while the Poco F5 Pro is expected to have a 120Hz panel, contributing to smoother scrolling and animations.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are listed as having Photo/Video capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are missing. Given the Poco F5 Pro’s positioning, it likely features a more sophisticated camera system with a larger main sensor and potentially optical image stabilization (OIS). The Meizu Note 22 Pro, targeting a more value-conscious segment, may prioritize affordability over camera prowess. Without specific sensor details, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment, but the Poco F5 Pro is likely to deliver superior image quality, especially in low-light conditions.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Poco F5 Pro’s Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4nm) is a flagship-level processor with a Cortex-X2 prime core clocked at 3.0 GHz, offering substantial performance headroom. The Meizu Note 22 Pro’s Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 (4nm) features a Cortex-A720 prime core at 2.5 GHz. While the 7s Gen 3 is efficient, the 8+ Gen 1’s architectural advantages and higher clock speeds will result in noticeably faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and superior gaming performance. The Poco F5 Pro’s LPDDR5X RAM further enhances its performance capabilities. The Meizu Note 22 Pro’s CPU configuration, with a mix of A720 and A520 cores, suggests a focus on balanced performance rather than outright speed.
Battery Life
Both devices achieve an endurance rating of 99 hours, suggesting comparable real-world battery life despite differing battery capacities (not specified for either). However, the Poco F5 Pro offers a more versatile charging solution with 67W wired charging (50% in 15 minutes) and 30W wireless charging (50% in 32 minutes). The Meizu Note 22 Pro’s 80W wired charging is faster, reaching 50% in 22 minutes, but lacks wireless charging. The faster wired charging of the Meizu Note 22 Pro is beneficial for quick top-ups, but the Poco F5 Pro’s wireless charging adds convenience.
Buying Guide
Buy the Meizu Note 22 Pro if you prioritize long-term efficiency and a potentially smoother everyday experience with less thermal throttling during sustained use. It’s ideal for users who value battery life and don’t necessarily need the absolute fastest performance. Buy the Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro if you demand maximum performance for gaming, video editing, or other intensive tasks, and appreciate a brighter, more vibrant display. It’s the better choice for power users and those who want a phone that can handle anything they throw at it.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 in the Poco F5 Pro overheat during extended gaming sessions?
The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 is known to generate heat under sustained load. However, the Poco F5 Pro likely incorporates thermal management solutions like vapor chamber cooling to mitigate throttling. While some performance reduction is possible during prolonged gaming, it shouldn't be a major issue for most users. The Meizu Note 22 Pro's 7s Gen 3 will run cooler, but at the cost of overall performance.
❓ Does the Meizu Note 22 Pro support high refresh rate displays for smoother scrolling?
Unfortunately, the refresh rate of the Meizu Note 22 Pro's display is not specified in the provided data. This is a significant omission, as a high refresh rate (90Hz or 120Hz) greatly enhances the user experience. The Poco F5 Pro is expected to have a 120Hz display, giving it an advantage in this area.
❓ How does the 80W charging on the Meizu Note 22 Pro compare to the 67W charging on the Poco F5 Pro in real-world usage?
While 80W is numerically faster, the difference in charging speed isn't massive. The Meizu Note 22 Pro reaches 50% in 22 minutes, while the Poco F5 Pro takes 15 minutes. The Poco F5 Pro also offers 30W wireless charging, a feature absent on the Meizu Note 22 Pro, providing added convenience.
