Meizu Note 22 Pro vs Google Pixel 7a: Which Mid-Range Champion Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing camera quality and software experience, the Google Pixel 7a is the better choice. However, the Meizu Note 22 Pro offers significantly faster charging and a potentially smoother experience for sustained tasks due to its more efficient chipset, making it ideal for power users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Meizu Note 22 Pro | Google Pixel 7a |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 20, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71 - GWKK3, G0DZQ |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GWKK3 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GHL1X, G82U8 | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, May 20 | 2023, May 10 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, May 20 | Available. Released 2023, May 10 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 163.8 x 76.2 x 8.4 mm (6.45 x 3.00 x 0.33 in) | 152 x 72.9 x 9 mm (5.98 x 2.87 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 197.5 g (6.98 oz) | 193.5 g (6.84 oz) |
| - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1224 x 2720 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~440 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~429 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~88.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.1 inches, 90.7 cm2 (~81.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, 700 nits (typ), 1600 nits (peak), 4500 nits (peak) | OLED, HDR, 90Hz |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.5 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.4 GHz Cortex-A720 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A520) | Octa-core (2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7635 Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 (4 nm) | Google Tensor G2 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 810 | Mali-G710 MP7 |
| OS | Flyme AIOS 2 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 15mm (ultrawide) 2 MP, f/2.4 | - |
| Video | Yes, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.1 | 13 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Video | Yes | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1C+B2a), GALILEO, QZSS, GLONASS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, QC4+, PD3.0, PPS, 50% in 22 min | 18W wired, PD3.0 7.5W wireless |
| Type | 6200 mAh | Li-Po 4385 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Lake Glide, Cloud White, Star Ash | Charcoal, Snow, Sea, Coral |
| Models | - | GWKK3, GHL1X, G0DZQ, G82U8 |
| Price | About 300 EUR | € 179.90 / $ 150.00 / £ 170.00 / ₹ 25,980 |
Meizu Note 22 Pro
- Exceptional camera quality and image processing
- Smooth and optimized software experience
- Guaranteed software updates from Google
- High peak display brightness
- Slow 18W wired charging
- Potential for thermal throttling under heavy load
Google Pixel 7a
- Blazing-fast 80W wired charging
- More power-efficient Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 chipset
- Potentially better sustained performance
- Clean Android experience (typically)
- Camera likely inferior to Pixel 7a
- No wireless charging
Display Comparison
The Pixel 7a boasts a measured peak brightness of 1070 nits, ensuring excellent visibility outdoors. While the Meizu Note 22 Pro’s display specs are not provided, it’s likely to be slightly dimmer. The Pixel 7a’s OLED panel is known for its color accuracy, a crucial factor for content creators. The absence of LTPO technology on either device means neither offers adaptive refresh rates for optimal battery efficiency, but the Pixel 7a’s higher brightness gives it an edge in direct sunlight.
Camera Comparison
Google’s Pixel phones are renowned for their computational photography, and the Pixel 7a is no exception. While specific sensor details aren’t provided, the Pixel 7a’s image processing capabilities, powered by the Tensor G2, deliver exceptional dynamic range and detail. The Meizu Note 22 Pro’s camera specs are currently unknown, making a direct comparison difficult. However, given Meizu’s history, it’s unlikely to match the Pixel 7a’s software-driven image quality. The Pixel 7a’s video capabilities are also likely superior, benefiting from the Tensor G2’s dedicated image signal processor.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Google Tensor G2 (5nm) features a Cortex-X1 prime core clocked at 2.85 GHz, designed for peak performance in AI tasks and image processing. Conversely, the Meizu Note 22 Pro utilizes the Qualcomm SM7635 Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 (4nm) with a Cortex-A720 prime core at 2.5 GHz. While the Tensor G2 has higher clock speeds on its prime core, the Snapdragon 7s Gen 3’s 4nm process offers superior power efficiency. This translates to potentially less thermal throttling during extended gaming sessions and better overall battery life. The Pixel 7a’s CPU architecture is older (Cortex-A78) compared to the Note 22 Pro’s (Cortex-A720), further suggesting the Meizu may have an edge in sustained performance.
Battery Life
The Pixel 7a has an endurance rating of 76 hours, indicating solid battery life. However, the Meizu Note 22 Pro’s 80W wired charging is a game-changer. It can reach 50% charge in just 22 minutes, significantly faster than the Pixel 7a’s 18W charging. While the Pixel 7a offers 7.5W wireless charging, the Meizu Note 22 Pro lacks this feature. The Snapdragon 7s Gen 3’s 4nm process also contributes to better power efficiency, potentially offsetting any capacity differences between the two devices.
Buying Guide
Buy the Meizu Note 22 Pro if you need exceptionally fast charging, prioritize sustained performance over peak bursts, and appreciate a less software-heavy Android experience. Buy the Google Pixel 7a if you value computational photography, seamless software updates, and a polished, integrated ecosystem, even if it means slower charging and potentially more thermal throttling under heavy load.