Meizu Note 22 4G vs Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G emerges as the stronger choice. Its 67W charging significantly reduces downtime, and the inclusion of 5G provides future-proofing, despite the similar performance offered by both chipsets. The Meizu Note 22 is a viable alternative for those prioritizing a clean software experience and don't require 5G.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Meizu Note 22 4G | Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - Global |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 - Global |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - Global |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA - India | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, March 04 | 2022, February 28 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, May 20 | Available. Released 2022, March 23 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 165.2 x 75.5 x 8.4 mm (6.50 x 2.97 x 0.33 in) | 164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 204 g (7.20 oz) | 205 g (7.23 oz) |
| - | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2436 pixels (~393 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 109.9 cm2 (~88.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, 550 nits (typ), 1200 nits (HBM), 1800 nits (peak) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 15, Flyme OS | Android 11, MIUI 13 for POCO |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM, 1TB 8GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Triple | 108 MP, f/1.7, (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF - Global version 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 0.7µm, PDAF - India version 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.0 | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 6.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 40W wired, 40W PD, PD3 | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 70% in 22 min, 100% in 41 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Eclipse Black, Titanium Lux, Steel Blue, Graphite Mist | Laser Black, Laser Blue, Poco Yellow |
| Models | M2513 | 2201116PG |
| Price | About 180 EUR | € 160.40 / $ 419.99 / £ 255.00 / ₹ 12,940 |
| SAR | - | 1.06 W/kg (head) 1.09 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.60 W/kg (head) 0.96 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 119h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.8 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 335353 (v8), 384646 (v9) GeekBench: 2063 (v5.1) GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Meizu Note 22 4G
- Potentially cleaner software experience (Meizu Flyme OS)
- Efficient Mediatek Helio G99 chipset
- 40W fast charging with PD support
- Limited to 4G connectivity
- Lack of detailed camera specifications
- Less established brand recognition
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G
- 5G connectivity for future-proofing
- Significantly faster 67W charging
- Wider availability and support network
- Software experience may include bloatware (MIUI)
- Similar chipset performance to the Meizu Note 22
- Potentially less efficient power management
Display Comparison
Both devices share an 'Infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, suggesting typical IPS LCD characteristics. However, detailed display specs like peak brightness and color gamut coverage are missing. Given the price point, expect both to offer adequate, but not exceptional, viewing experiences. The lack of information prevents a definitive winner, but the Poco X4 Pro's larger screen size (typically found in this model line) may offer a more immersive experience.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but specific details regarding sensor size, aperture, and image processing are absent. The omission of details suggests neither phone will excel in photography. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on the Poco X4 Pro is likely a marketing feature with limited practical value. Without further information, it's difficult to assess camera quality, but the larger sensor size (typically found in Poco X series) may give it a slight edge in low-light conditions.
Performance
The Meizu Note 22 4G utilizes the Mediatek Helio G99 (6nm), featuring an octa-core CPU with 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. The Poco X4 Pro 5G is powered by the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm) with an octa-core CPU consisting of 2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold and 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver cores. While clock speeds are similar, the architectural differences between the Cortex-A76 and Kryo 660 Gold cores are subtle. Both chips are designed for efficient performance in the mid-range, and real-world performance will likely be comparable for everyday tasks. The Snapdragon 695's integrated 5G modem is a key differentiator, offering faster data speeds where available. The G99's strength lies in its power efficiency, potentially leading to slightly better battery life during sustained use.
Battery Life
Both devices boast an endurance rating of 119 hours, indicating similar battery life under typical usage. However, the Poco X4 Pro 5G significantly outperforms the Meizu Note 22 4G in charging speed. The Poco X4 Pro supports 67W wired charging, achieving 70% charge in 22 minutes and 100% in 41 minutes, while the Meizu Note 22 is limited to 40W wired charging with PD3 and PD support. This faster charging capability is a major advantage for the Poco X4 Pro, minimizing downtime and providing greater convenience.
Buying Guide
Buy the Meizu Note 22 4G if you prioritize a potentially cleaner software experience and are content with 4G connectivity. It's a good fit for users who primarily use Wi-Fi and don't need the latest cellular technology. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G if you value faster charging speeds, future-proof 5G connectivity, and a more established ecosystem of accessories and support. This is the better option for users who frequently travel or rely on mobile data.