The Meizu Note 16 Pro and Xiaomi Redmi K20 Pro Premium represent interesting points in the smartphone landscape. The K20 Pro Premium, while older, boasts a flagship Snapdragon 855+ chipset. The Note 16 Pro, a more recent release, leverages the efficiency of the Snapdragon 7s Gen 3. This comparison dissects which phone delivers the best experience for today’s user, considering performance, charging, and overall value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and gaming, the Xiaomi Redmi K20 Pro Premium edges out the Meizu Note 16 Pro. The Snapdragon 855+ offers a significant performance advantage, despite being built on a larger 7nm process. However, the Note 16 Pro’s 80W charging is a compelling feature for those who value speed.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 20, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | CDMA 800 & TD-SCDMA |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, May 13 | 2019, September. Released 2019, September |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, May 16 | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 163.8 x 76.2 x 8.4 mm (6.45 x 3.00 x 0.33 in) | 156.7 x 74.3 x 8.8 mm (6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 197.5 g (6.98 oz) | 191 g (6.74 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1224 x 2720 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~440 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~88.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.39 inches, 100.2 cm2 (~86.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, 700 nits (typ), 1600 nits (peak), 4500 nits (peak) | Super AMOLED, HDR10 |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.5 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.4 GHz Cortex-A720 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A520) | Octa-core (1x2.96 GHz Kryo 485 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 485) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7635 Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855+ (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 810 | Adreno 640 (700 MHz) |
| OS | Flyme AIOS 2 | Android 10, MIUI 11 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 15mm (ultrawide)
2 MP, f/2.4 | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.4, 53mm (telephoto), 1/4.0", 1.12µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom
13 MP, f/2.4, 12mm (ultrawide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm |
| Video | Yes | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/120/240fps, 1080p@960fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.1 | Motorized pop-up 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio
|
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1C+B2a), GALILEO, QZSS, GLONASS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1), GALILEO (E1+E5a) |
| Radio | Unspecified | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, QC4+, PD3.0, PPS | 27W wired, QC4 |
| Type | 6200 mAh | Li-Po 4000 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Gray, Blue, White | Carbon black, Flame red, Glacier blue, Summer Honey, Pearl White |
| Price | About 190 EUR | About 450 EUR |
Meizu Note 16 Pro
- Incredibly fast 80W charging
- More power-efficient Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 (4nm)
- Supports multiple charging protocols (QC4+, PD3.0, PPS)
- Less powerful CPU and GPU compared to the Snapdragon 855+
- Potentially lower-quality display compared to the 'Premium' K20 Pro
Xiaomi Redmi K20 Pro Premium
- More powerful Snapdragon 855+ processor
- Likely superior camera system with larger sensor
- Potentially higher-quality display
- Significantly slower 27W charging
- Less power-efficient Snapdragon 855+ (7nm)
Display Comparison
Neither device’s display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the K20 Pro Premium’s positioning as a ‘Premium’ model, it likely features a higher-quality AMOLED panel with potentially better color accuracy and peak brightness. The Note 16 Pro, being a mid-range offering, may utilize a slightly less refined display. The absence of refresh rate data suggests both likely operate at 60Hz.
Camera Comparison
Without specific camera sensor details, a definitive comparison is difficult. However, the ‘Premium’ designation of the K20 Pro suggests a more sophisticated camera system. It likely features a larger main sensor and potentially better image stabilization (OIS). The Note 16 Pro, while capable, likely focuses on providing a good all-around camera experience rather than pushing the boundaries of mobile photography. We can assume both phones will offer a variety of shooting modes, but the K20 Pro Premium likely has an edge in low-light performance and dynamic range.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Xiaomi Redmi K20 Pro Premium’s Snapdragon 855+ (7nm) features a Kryo 485 CPU clocked up to 2.96 GHz, offering substantial processing power. The Meizu Note 16 Pro’s Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 (4nm) utilizes a Cortex-A720 based CPU, prioritizing efficiency. While the 7s Gen 3’s 4nm process offers better power efficiency, the 855+’s architectural advantages and higher clock speeds translate to superior performance in CPU-intensive tasks and gaming. The 7nm vs 4nm node difference means the 855+ will likely generate more heat under sustained load, potentially leading to throttling, but its initial performance ceiling is higher.
Battery Life
The Meizu Note 16 Pro’s 80W wired charging is a game-changer, significantly faster than the Redmi K20 Pro Premium’s 27W charging. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the 80W charging allows for a full charge in a fraction of the time. The Snapdragon 7s Gen 3’s efficiency may offset a potentially smaller battery capacity in the Note 16 Pro, providing comparable real-world battery life despite the K20 Pro Premium’s potentially larger battery. The K20 Pro Premium supports QC4, while the Note 16 Pro adds QC4+, PD3.0, and PPS, offering broader compatibility with various chargers.
Buying Guide
Buy the Meizu Note 16 Pro if you need incredibly fast charging and prioritize battery life over raw processing power. Its 80W charging capability and efficient Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 make it ideal for users constantly on the go. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi K20 Pro Premium if you prefer a more powerful processor for demanding tasks like gaming and video editing, and are willing to trade off charging speed for that performance boost.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 855+ in the Redmi K20 Pro Premium overheat during extended gaming sessions?
The Snapdragon 855+ is known to generate heat under sustained load. While Xiaomi likely implemented thermal management solutions, some throttling is possible during prolonged gaming. The 7nm process isn't as efficient as the 4nm process in the Note 16 Pro, meaning it will run hotter.
❓ How much faster is the 80W charging on the Meizu Note 16 Pro compared to the 27W charging on the Redmi K20 Pro Premium?
The 80W charging on the Note 16 Pro is significantly faster. Expect a full charge in around 30-40 minutes, while the K20 Pro Premium will likely take over 90 minutes to reach 100%. This difference is substantial for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly.
❓ Does the Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 in the Meizu Note 16 Pro offer enough performance for demanding mobile games like Genshin Impact?
The Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 can run Genshin Impact, but you may need to lower graphics settings for a smooth experience. It won't deliver the same level of performance as the Snapdragon 855+, but it's capable for casual gaming.
