Meizu Note 16 Pro vs OnePlus 7 Pro 5G: A Detailed Comparison of Snapdragon Power
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Meizu Note 16 Pro offers a compelling package. Its newer Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 provides surprisingly competitive performance, coupled with blazing-fast 80W charging. While the OnePlus 7 Pro 5G boasts 5G connectivity and a slightly more powerful (but older) Snapdragon 855, the Meizu’s value proposition is significantly stronger.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Meizu Note 16 Pro | OnePlus 7 Pro 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1800 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 20, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 41 NSA/Sub6/mmWave |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (5CA) Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G (2+ Gbps DL) |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, May 13 | 2019, May 14. Released 2019, September 06 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, May 16 | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 163.8 x 76.2 x 8.4 mm (6.45 x 3.00 x 0.33 in) | 162.6 x 75.9 x 8.8 mm (6.40 x 2.99 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 197.5 g (6.98 oz) | 206 g (7.27 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1224 x 2720 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~440 ppi density) | 1440 x 3120 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~515 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~88.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 109.2 cm2 (~88.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, 700 nits (typ), 1600 nits (peak), 4500 nits (peak) | Fluid AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.5 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.4 GHz Cortex-A720 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A520) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Kryo 485 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7635 Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 810 | Adreno 640 |
| OS | Flyme AIOS 2 | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 10, OxygenOS 10.0.4 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.0 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | Laser AF, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, panorama, HDR |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 15mm (ultrawide) 2 MP, f/2.4 | 48 MP, f/1.6, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.4, 78mm (telephoto), 3x zoom, PDAF, OIS 16 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide) |
| Video | Yes | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, 720p@480fps, Auto HDR, gyro-EIS, no video rec. with ultrawide camera |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.1 | Motorized pop-up 16 MP, f/2.0, 25mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1C+B2a), GALILEO, QZSS, GLONASS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1), GALILEO (E1+E5a) |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, QC4+, PD3.0, PPS | 30W wired |
| Type | 6200 mAh | Li-Po 4000 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Gray, Blue, White | Mirror Grey, Almond, Nebula Blue |
| Models | - | GM1925 |
| Price | About 190 EUR | About 800 EUR |
Meizu Note 16 Pro
- Blazing-fast 80W charging
- More efficient Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 (4nm)
- Potentially better value for money
- Likely lacks 5G connectivity
- Potentially inferior camera system
OnePlus 7 Pro 5G
- 5G connectivity
- Potentially superior camera quality
- Higher peak GPU performance
- Slower 30W charging
- Older, less efficient Snapdragon 855 (7nm)
Display Comparison
Neither device's display specifications are provided, so we must infer. The OnePlus 7 Pro 5G was known for its 90Hz AMOLED display, a significant advantage at the time. The Meizu Note 16 Pro likely features a standard 60Hz AMOLED panel, given its mid-range positioning. The OnePlus’s higher refresh rate would translate to smoother scrolling and animations, benefiting users who consume a lot of visual content. However, without specific brightness or color accuracy data, it’s difficult to definitively declare a winner. The OnePlus likely has a higher peak brightness due to its flagship status.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are absent, so we must rely on brand reputation and market positioning. The OnePlus 7 Pro 5G was lauded for its versatile camera system, likely featuring a larger main sensor and optical image stabilization (OIS). The Meizu Note 16 Pro, being a mid-range device, probably features a smaller sensor and potentially lacks OIS. Image processing will also differ; OnePlus typically aims for vibrant, social media-ready images, while Meizu’s processing might be more natural. Without specific sensor sizes and aperture information, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment, but the OnePlus 7 Pro 5G likely holds an advantage in image quality, particularly in low-light conditions.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The OnePlus 7 Pro 5G’s Snapdragon 855 (7nm) was a top-tier processor in its day, featuring a Kryo 485 CPU clocked up to 2.84 GHz. The Meizu Note 16 Pro utilizes the Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 (4nm), a more recent chip. While the 855 has a higher peak clock speed, the 7s Gen 3 benefits from a more efficient 4nm manufacturing process and newer Cortex-A720 cores. This translates to comparable, and in some cases, better sustained performance in the Meizu, especially considering thermal throttling. The 7s Gen 3’s architecture is more modern, offering improved power efficiency and AI capabilities. The OnePlus 7 Pro 5G likely has an edge in raw GPU power, but the Meizu’s efficiency will be noticeable in extended gaming sessions.
Battery Life
Battery capacities are not specified. However, the charging speeds are a major differentiator. The Meizu Note 16 Pro’s 80W wired charging is significantly faster than the OnePlus 7 Pro 5G’s 30W charging. This means the Meizu can go from 0-100% in a fraction of the time, a huge convenience for users who are always on the go. Even if the OnePlus 7 Pro 5G has a slightly larger battery, the Meizu’s faster charging will likely result in less downtime. The Snapdragon 7s Gen 3’s efficiency also contributes to better battery life in the Meizu, offsetting any potential capacity disadvantage.
Buying Guide
Buy the Meizu Note 16 Pro if you prioritize fast charging, efficient performance for everyday tasks and gaming, and excellent value for your money. It’s ideal for users who want a reliable, modern smartphone experience without breaking the bank. Buy the OnePlus 7 Pro 5G if 5G connectivity is absolutely essential, and you’re willing to pay a premium for a slightly older flagship experience, potentially benefiting from a larger established ecosystem.