Meizu Mblu 22 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy A53 5G: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing a brighter, more polished display and a well-established brand, the Samsung Galaxy A53 5G is the better choice. However, the Meizu Mblu 22 Pro offers a compelling alternative for those seeking a potentially more responsive experience in less demanding tasks, given its lower price point.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Meizu Mblu 22 Pro | Samsung Galaxy A53 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 12, 14, 20, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 48, 66 - SM-A536U |
| 5G bands | - | 2, 5, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - SM-A536U |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 2, 5, 48, 66, 77, 78, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - SM-A536V | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, March 04 | 2022, March 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, May 20 | Available. Released 2022, March 24 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 170.8 x 77.5 x 8.5 mm (6.72 x 3.05 x 0.33 in) | 159.6 x 74.8 x 8.1 mm (6.28 x 2.94 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 212 g (7.48 oz) | 189 g (6.67 oz) |
| - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1640 pixels (~264 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.79 inches, 109.5 cm2 (~82.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~85.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | TFT LCD, 120Hz, 400 nits (HBM) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 800 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G81 (12 nm) | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Mali-G68 |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 12, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 8 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 2 MP (macro) | - |
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.7X", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm 5 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | Yes | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0 | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | Yes | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer (market/region dependent) |
| - | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 25W wired |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Titan Black, Deep Sea Blue, Snow White | Black, White, Blue, Peach |
| Models | M2512 | SM-A536B, SM-A536B/DS, SM-A536U, SM-A536U1, SM-A5360, SM-A536E, SM-A536E/DS, SM-A536V, SM-A536W, SM-A536N, SM-S536DL |
| Price | About 120 EUR | $ 151.42 / £ 185.00 / € 169.14 |
| SAR | - | 0.75 W/kg (head) 1.58 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.89 W/kg (head) 1.60 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 113h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.5 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 329802 (v8), 379313 (v9) GeekBench: 1891 (v5.1) GFXBench: 19fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Meizu Mblu 22 Pro
- More powerful Exynos 1280 chipset
- Brighter and potentially smoother display
- Established brand with software support
- Potentially higher price
- Exynos chip can be prone to throttling under heavy load
Samsung Galaxy A53 5G
- Lower price point
- Functional 5G connectivity
- Potentially adequate performance for basic tasks
- Less powerful Mediatek Helio G81 chipset
- Likely lower display quality
- Uncertain software support and updates
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A53 5G boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 830 nits. This is crucial for outdoor visibility, a clear advantage over the Mblu 22 Pro (brightness data unavailable, but likely lower given the chipset). While both are likely to use AMOLED panels, the A53’s 'Infinite' contrast ratio suggests a more optimized panel. The lack of refresh rate information for the Mblu 22 Pro suggests it may be limited to 60Hz, while the A53 likely offers 120Hz, resulting in smoother scrolling and animations.
Camera Comparison
Both devices offer photo and video capabilities, but detailed sensor information is lacking for the Mblu 22 Pro. The A53 5G likely features a more sophisticated camera system with optical image stabilization (OIS) on its main sensor, resulting in sharper images and smoother videos, especially in low light. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on the A53 is largely a marketing gimmick, offering limited practical benefit. Without specific details on the Mblu 22 Pro’s camera sensors, it’s difficult to make a direct comparison, but the A53’s Exynos ISP likely provides superior image processing.
Performance
The Exynos 1280 (5nm) in the Galaxy A53 5G represents a substantial leap in processing power and efficiency over the Mediatek Helio G81 (12nm) found in the Mblu 22 Pro. The A53’s CPU features Cortex-A78 cores clocked at 2.4 GHz, offering significantly better single-core performance than the A75 cores in the Mblu 22 Pro. The 5nm fabrication process of the Exynos 1280 also translates to better thermal management, reducing the likelihood of performance throttling during sustained workloads. While the Mblu 22 Pro may handle everyday tasks adequately, the A53 is better equipped for demanding games and multitasking.
Battery Life
Both phones share an endurance rating of 113 hours, suggesting similar real-world battery life despite the Mblu 22 Pro’s lower charging wattage (18W vs 25W). The A53’s faster charging allows for quicker top-ups, potentially mitigating any slight differences in overall battery capacity. The efficiency gains from the Exynos 1280’s 5nm process likely contribute to the A53’s comparable endurance despite its more powerful processor.
Buying Guide
Buy the Meizu Mblu 22 Pro if you need a functional 5G phone for basic tasks, prioritize value over brand recognition, and are comfortable with a less refined software experience. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A53 5G if you prefer a brighter, more vibrant display, a more polished user interface, and the peace of mind that comes with Samsung’s established support and software updates.