The Meizu M6s, while an older model, remains a relevant contender in the ultra-budget space. However, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 represents a significant generational leap, boasting a more modern chipset and faster charging. This comparison dissects the key differences to determine which phone offers the best value in 2024.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 is the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 680 chipset, built on a 6nm process, delivers better efficiency and sustained performance than the Meizu M6s’s Exynos 7872. The Redmi Note 11’s 33W charging is a game-changer, completing a full charge in just 60 minutes.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 40 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat6 300/50 Mbps | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2018, January. Released 2018, January | 2022, January 26 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2022, February 09 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, aluminum back, aluminum frame | - |
| Dimensions | 152 x 72.5 x 8 mm (5.98 x 2.85 x 0.31 in) | 159.9 x 73.9 x 8.1 mm (6.30 x 2.91 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 160 g (5.64 oz) | 179 g (6.31 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1440 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~282 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 5.7 inches, 83.8 cm2 (~76.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | AMOLED, 90Hz, 700 nits, 1000 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Hexa-core (4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A53 & 2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A73) | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) |
| Chipset | Exynos 7872 (14 nm) | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G71 MP1 | Adreno 610 |
| OS | Android 7.0 (Nougat), Flyme 6.2 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, HyperOS |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 32GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 3GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, PDAF | 13 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0 | 13 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm |
| Video | - | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 33W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 60 min |
| Type | Li-Ion 3000 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Silver, Gold, Blue | Graphite Gray, Twilight Blue, Star Blue |
| Models | M6s | 2201117TG, 2201117TI, 2201117TY, 2201117TL |
| Price | About 150 EUR | £ 95.00 / € 97.99 / ₹ 11,950 |
| SAR | - | 0.97 W/kg (head) 0.93 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.60 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 126h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-25.8 LUFS (Very good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 228044 (v8), 244526 (v9)
GeekBench: 1662 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 6.8fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Meizu M6s
- Lower initial purchase price
- Compact and lightweight design (likely)
- Functional for basic smartphone tasks
- Outdated chipset and architecture
- Slower charging speed (18W)
- Inferior display quality
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
- More efficient Snapdragon 680 chipset
- Significantly faster 33W charging
- Brighter and more vibrant display
- Slightly higher purchase price
- May be larger and heavier than the M6s
- 2MP macro camera is largely unnecessary
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11’s display is a clear winner, achieving a measured peak brightness of 736 nits. This significantly surpasses what the M6s likely offers (based on its market segment), resulting in better outdoor visibility. While both have an 'infinite' contrast ratio (typical for IPS panels), the Redmi Note 11’s higher brightness makes a tangible difference in real-world usage. The M6s likely has a lower resolution and color gamut, impacting image clarity and vibrancy.
Camera Comparison
Both devices feature 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but specifics are limited. The Redmi Note 11 likely benefits from Qualcomm’s image signal processor (ISP), offering improved image processing and noise reduction. While the M6s may have a decent primary sensor, the Redmi Note 11’s likely larger sensor and more advanced software algorithms will result in superior image quality, particularly in low-light conditions. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on the Redmi Note 11 is largely a marketing feature and offers limited practical benefit.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Redmi Note 11’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 (6nm) utilizes a more efficient architecture than the Meizu M6s’s Exynos 7872 (14nm). The Snapdragon 680’s octa-core configuration (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) provides a performance advantage over the M6s’s hexa-core setup (4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A53 & 2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A73). The 6nm process also translates to less heat generation, reducing the likelihood of performance throttling during extended use. While both are 4G-only devices, the Snapdragon 680 generally offers better modem performance.
Battery Life
Both phones achieve an endurance rating of 126 hours, suggesting similar overall battery life *despite* the difference in charging speeds. However, the Redmi Note 11’s 33W wired charging, supporting PD3.0 and QC3, is a massive advantage. A full charge in 60 minutes is significantly faster than the M6s’s 18W charging. This convenience factor is crucial for users who rely heavily on their smartphones throughout the day. The Snapdragon 680’s efficiency also contributes to maintaining battery life over time.
Buying Guide
Buy the Meizu M6s if you prioritize a very low initial cost and are comfortable with slower performance and charging speeds. It's a functional device for basic tasks. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 if you value a smoother user experience, longer battery life, significantly faster charging, and a brighter, more modern display. It’s a worthwhile investment for anyone seeking a reliable daily driver.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Exynos 7872 in the Meizu M6s struggle with demanding apps like PUBG Mobile?
Yes, the Exynos 7872 is a relatively older and less powerful chipset. While it can run PUBG Mobile, expect lower frame rates and potential stuttering, especially on higher graphics settings. The Redmi Note 11’s Snapdragon 680 will provide a much smoother gaming experience.
❓ Is the 33W charging on the Redmi Note 11 compatible with all USB-C chargers?
The Redmi Note 11 supports PD3.0 and QC3 charging protocols. While it will charge with any USB-C charger, you’ll achieve the full 33W speed with a charger that supports these protocols. Using a standard 5W charger will result in significantly slower charging times.
❓ How does the 6nm process of the Snapdragon 680 impact real-world battery life compared to the 14nm Exynos 7872?
The 6nm process is significantly more efficient than 14nm. This means the Snapdragon 680 consumes less power for the same level of performance, resulting in longer battery life and less heat generation. While both phones have a similar endurance rating, the Redmi Note 11 will likely maintain its battery health for a longer period.
❓ Is the camera on the Meizu M6s sufficient for casual social media photos?
The Meizu M6s camera is adequate for basic social media photos in good lighting conditions. However, it will struggle in low-light environments, producing noisy and less detailed images. The Redmi Note 11 offers a noticeable improvement in camera quality, especially in challenging lighting scenarios.
