The Meizu M6s and M6T represent a fascinating point in the budget smartphone landscape. Both devices aimed to deliver a compelling experience at an accessible price point, but they took different approaches to achieving this. The M6s leveraged Samsung’s Exynos 7872, while the M6T opted for MediaTek’s MT6750. This comparison dissects the core differences between these two models, focusing on how their contrasting chipsets impact real-world performance and user experience.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing responsiveness and occasional gaming, the Meizu M6s is the better choice. Its Exynos 7872, built on a smaller 14nm process, delivers noticeably snappier performance than the M6T’s older 28nm MT6750, despite having fewer cores. While the M6T might offer slightly better battery endurance due to its less powerful chip, the performance trade-off isn't worth it for most.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 40 | 1, 3, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat6 300/50 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | CDMA 800 & TD-SCDMA |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2018, January. Released 2018, January | 2018, May. Released 2018, June |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, aluminum back, aluminum frame | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 152 x 72.5 x 8 mm (5.98 x 2.85 x 0.31 in) | 152.3 x 73 x 8.4 mm (6.00 x 2.87 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 160 g (5.64 oz) | 145 g (5.11 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1440 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~282 ppi density) | 720 x 1440 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~282 ppi density) |
| Size | 5.7 inches, 83.8 cm2 (~76.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 5.7 inches, 83.8 cm2 (~75.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Hexa-core (4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A53 & 2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A73) | Octa-core (4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.0 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Exynos 7872 (14 nm) | Mediatek MT6750 (28 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G71 MP1 | Mali-T860MP2 |
| OS | Android 7.0 (Nougat), Flyme 6.2 | Android 7.0 (Nougat), Flyme UI |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 32GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 3GB RAM | 32GB 3GB RAM, 32GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 13 MP, f/2.2, PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash | LED flash, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, PDAF | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0 | 8 MP, f/2.0 |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP, LE | 4.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS | GPS, GLONASS |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | microUSB 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | - |
| Type | Li-Ion 3000 mAh, non-removable | Li-Ion 3300 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Silver, Gold, Blue | Black, Champagne Gold, Coral Red |
| Models | M6s | M6T |
| Price | About 150 EUR | About 130 EUR |
Meizu M6s
- Faster and more responsive performance thanks to the Exynos 7872.
- 18W fast charging for quicker top-ups.
- More efficient 14nm manufacturing process.
- Potentially slightly shorter battery life compared to the M6T.
- May run slightly warmer under heavy load.
Meizu M6T
- Potentially longer battery life due to the less powerful chipset.
- Lower cost (likely, given the older chipset).
- Less heat generation during basic tasks.
- Noticeably slower performance, especially with multitasking and gaming.
- Likely slower charging speeds.
- Less efficient 28nm manufacturing process.
Display Comparison
Neither device is known for a standout display. Given the context data focuses on the chipset, we can infer both likely utilized LCD panels common in this price bracket. The absence of information regarding resolution or refresh rate suggests both are standard for the time. The key difference will likely be color calibration and viewing angles, which would require hands-on testing. However, the chipset differences won't directly impact display quality.
Camera Comparison
Without specific camera sensor details, a direct comparison is difficult. However, given the budget nature of both phones, it’s likely both feature similar camera setups. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on either device is largely a marketing gimmick, offering limited practical benefit. Image processing will be a key differentiator, and the Exynos 7872’s slightly more powerful ISP (Image Signal Processor) *could* translate to better image quality in challenging lighting conditions, but this is speculative without further data. Expect similar results in good lighting.
Performance
The core of the difference lies in the chipsets. The Meizu M6s’ Exynos 7872, fabricated on a 14nm process, features a hexa-core configuration with two Cortex-A73 cores clocked at 2.0 GHz and four Cortex-A53 cores at 1.6 GHz. This architecture provides a significant performance boost over the M6T’s MediaTek MT6750. The MT6750, built on a larger 28nm node, utilizes an octa-core setup with four Cortex-A53 cores at 1.5 GHz and another four at 1.0 GHz. While the MT6750 has more cores, the older architecture and larger process node result in lower single-core and multi-core performance. The Exynos 7872 will handle demanding apps and multitasking with greater ease, offering a more fluid user experience. Gamers will also see a benefit on the M6s.
Battery Life
The M6T’s less powerful MT6750, built on a 28nm process, will likely consume less power than the M6s’ 14nm Exynos 7872. However, the difference won’t be dramatic. The M6s’ 18W wired charging is a significant advantage, allowing for faster top-ups compared to the M6T’s likely slower charging speed (spec not provided, but typical for the time). The faster charging partially offsets any potential battery life advantage the M6T might have.
Buying Guide
Buy the Meizu M6s if you need a phone that feels responsive for everyday tasks like browsing, social media, and light multitasking, and if you occasionally enjoy mobile gaming. The Exynos 7872 provides a smoother experience. Buy the Meizu M6T if your primary concern is maximizing battery life above all else, and you primarily use your phone for basic communication and very light tasks. Be prepared for a slower, less fluid user experience.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Exynos 7872 in the M6s overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
While the Exynos 7872 is more powerful, it's still a mid-range chip. Overheating is unlikely to be a major issue during moderate gaming. However, extended, graphically intensive gaming sessions *could* lead to some thermal throttling, reducing performance slightly. The 14nm process helps mitigate this compared to older, larger node chips.
❓ Is the difference in performance between the M6s and M6T noticeable in everyday tasks like browsing and social media?
Yes, the difference is noticeable. The Exynos 7872’s faster CPU and more efficient architecture result in smoother animations, quicker app loading times, and a more responsive overall experience. While the M6T is usable for these tasks, the M6s feels significantly more fluid.
❓ How does the 18W charging on the M6s compare to the charging speed of the M6T?
The M6s’ 18W charging is considerably faster than what the M6T likely offers. While the M6T’s exact charging speed isn’t specified, it’s likely around 10W or lower, resulting in a significantly longer time to fully charge the device. The M6s can top up much quicker, reducing downtime.